Adelopsis brunnea Jeannel, 1936
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4696.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1F2FC7DE-C871-475F-BDB0-975965A9B9B1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5923424 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B20E4654-FFA6-FF98-BAF4-294BFDF8C3FD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Adelopsis brunnea Jeannel, 1936 |
status |
|
Adelopsis brunnea Jeannel, 1936 View in CoL
Adelopsis brunneus Jeannel, 1936: 66 View in CoL [and Figs. 86–87 View FIGURES 76–88 ].
Adelopsis brunneus brunneus View in CoL ; Szymczakowski, 1975: 15 [and Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–3 ] (type seen).
Adelopsis brunnea brunnea View in CoL ; Gnaspini, 1996: 539 (spelling corrected to feminine gender); Gnaspini and Peck, 2001: 429 (assignment to group), 430.
Holotype male [a single specimen in original description, assumed as holotype] in BMNH [not presently in BMNH (when we requested it for analysis), not examined].
Length: 2.2 mm (original description and Szymczakowski, 1975).
Type locality: “ Colombie ”.
Distribution. Colombia: known only from “ type locality” (original description; Szymczakowski, 1975).
Taxonomic Remarks.
1) See Taxonomic Remarks under Adelopsis ascutellaris , above.
2) Szymczakowski (1975: 14) stated that it is very probable that A. ovalis is a synonym of A. brunnea ; and he proposed to use the latter as the valid name [but the former has page precedence] if this synonymy is proved right. However, this ‘potential synonymy’ has never been used in the literature afterwards. We here presently consider both as valid species, and do not propose a revalidation because we understand that Szymczakowski´s statement is not a valid taxonomic act.
3) As proposed in Gnaspini (1996: 539) and Peck et al. (1998: 62), all subspecies of A. brunnea Jeannel 1936 are here raised to species status. The combination of the variation observed on aedeagus, genital segment, eyes, antenna, male mesotibia, and spermatheca allow taxon recognition (see discussion under each of these taxa). As a result, this would be the only subspecies left in the species. Therefore, we here abandon the use of subspecies in A. brunnea .
4) This species is tentatively assigned to subgroup, since the genital segment (which is here considered important for subgroup assignment) is unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Adelopsis brunnea Jeannel, 1936
Gnaspini, Pedro & Peck, Stewart B. 2019 |
Adelopsis brunnea brunnea
Gnaspini, P. & Peck, S. B. 2001: 429 |
Adelopsis brunneus brunneus
Szymczakowski, W. 1975: 15 |
Adelopsis brunneus
Jeannel, R. 1936: 66 |