Smeringopina ibadan, Huber, Bernhard A., 2013

Huber, Bernhard A., 2013, Revision and cladistic analysis of the Guineo-Congolian spider genus Smeringopina Kraus (Araneae, Pholcidae, Zootaxa 3713 (1), pp. 1-160 : 27-28

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3713.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C5F0BC11-92C0-4B30-9DB3-200882AC8950

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6162021

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B20287ED-FFFE-FF81-B990-C238FCCC3E95

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Smeringopina ibadan
status

sp. nov.

Smeringopina ibadan View in CoL new species

Figs. 363–371 View FIGURES 359 – 371 , 384–389 View FIGURES 384 – 389

Type. ♂ holotype from Nigeria, Ibadan , IITA [International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, 7°29.4’N, 3°53.4’E], fallow bush, 28.x.1974 (A. Russell-Smith), in ZFMK (Ar 10248).

Other material examined. NIGERIA: Ibadan , same locality as holotype, 22.iv.1974 (A. Russell-Smith), 1♀ in ZFMK (Ar 10249); same locality, secondary forest, 17.iv.1981 (A. Russell-Smith), 1♂ in ZFMK (Ar 10250); same locality, sweeping at road verges, 17.v.1974 (A. Russell-Smith), 1♂ in BMNH.

Etymology. The name is a noun in apposition, derived from the type locality.

Diagnosis. Easily distinguished from known congeners by huge distal male cheliceral apophyses ( Figs. 364 View FIGURES 359 – 371 , 387 View FIGURES 384 – 389 ), by distinctive shape of procursus ( Figs. 384–385 View FIGURES 384 – 389 ), and by longer than wide epigynum with flat and deeply indented anterior plate ( Figs. 368 View FIGURES 359 – 371 , 389 View FIGURES 384 – 389 ).

Male (holotype). Total body length 4.2, carapace width 1.6. Leg 1: 38.4 (9.0 + 0.5 + 9.3 + 18.0 + 1.6), tibia 2: 5.7, tibia 3: 4.1, tibia 4: 6.1; tibia 1 L/d: 70. Distance PME-PME 205 µm, diameter PME 140 µm, distance PME- ALE 55 µm, distance AME-AME 45 µm, diameter AME 135 µm. Carapace ochre-yellow with darker triangular mark posteriorly and lateral margins; ocular area ochre-yellow, clypeus with dark rim, sternum light brown; legs pale ochre-yellow, without darker rings; abdomen pale ochre-gray with barely visible darker pattern (specimen probably bleached). Habitus as in Figs. 365–367 View FIGURES 359 – 371 , ocular area slightly elevated, secondary eyes with indistinct ‘pseudo-lenses’; clypeus unmodified except longer than usual hairs; deep thoracic pit and pair of shallow furrows diverging behind pit. Chelicerae as in Figs. 364 View FIGURES 359 – 371 and 387 View FIGURES 384 – 389 , with lateral proximal apophyses, small frontal projections, and distinctively exaggerated distal apophyses bent upwards at their tips, without modified hairs ( Fig. 388 View FIGURES 384 – 389 ). Palps as in Figs. 369–371 View FIGURES 359 – 371 ; coxa with distinct retrolateral projection weakly sclerotized; trochanter with ventral sclerotized rim but without projection; femur with whitish ventral area bordered retrolaterally by weakly sclerotized flap, without prolateral modification; prolateral femur-patella joint shifted toward ventrally (though not extremely); tarsus without stronger hairs; procursus with several distinctive processes ( Figs. 384–385 View FIGURES 384 – 389 ; distal part appears hinged: Fig. 370 View FIGURES 359 – 371 ); bulb with weakly sclerotized conical embolus ( Fig. 386 View FIGURES 384 – 389 ). Legs without spines and curved hairs, with few vertical hairs (many hairs missing), retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 1.5%; prolateral trichobothrium present on all tibiae; pseudosegments barely visible. Gonopore apparently with two epiandrous spigots (not confirmed by SEM).

Variation. The other two males are bleached and in poor condition, with abdomens and tibiae 1 missing.

Female. In general similar to male; clypeus with shorter hairs. Tibia 1 missing. Epigynum longer than wide, with flat and deeply indented anterior plate and large posterior plate fitting into this indentation ( Fig. 368 View FIGURES 359 – 371 ); internal genitalia as in Figs. 363 View FIGURES 359 – 371 and 389 View FIGURES 384 – 389 .

Distribution. Known from type locality only ( Fig. 293 View FIGURE 293 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Pholcidae

Genus

Smeringopina

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Pholcidae

Genus

Smeringopina

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Pholcidae

Genus

Smeringopina

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF