Euscelus dominicanus, Hamilton Table Of Contents, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1495.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4F99C938-CB9B-44B1-B88D-5800E6A57F11 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B157CF6A-FFE2-FF9F-14B6-42E6FD74F982 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Euscelus dominicanus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Euscelus dominicanus n. sp.
( Figs. 12 View FIGURES 9–12 , 65-68 View FIGURES 65–68 )
Type locality: Dominican Republic , W. I.
Type specimens: Holotype male with the following labels: Dominican Republic, La Vega, 1.4-2.6 km E Manabao , 5 June 1994, R Turnbow ; Allotype female: [labeled same as holotype]. Paratypes: 1 female,
Dominican republic, La Vega, vic. La Cienaga, 18 July, 1996, R Turnbow ( CMNC). 1 male , Dom. Rep., LaVega , 15 km S El Rio, ix-4-1997, PW Kovarik ( CWOB). 1 male , Republic Dominicana , La Vega prov., 4- ix-1967, LH Rolston collector ( TAMC). 1 male , Haiti, Port de Paix , EC & GM Leonard, May 29, 1926 ( USNM) .
Type holder: Canadian Museum of Nature , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ( CMNC) .
Description: Color: Reddish-brown throughout; profemoral base, ventrals, middle and hind legs paler; pronotum with dark irregular line like markings on each side of middle; elytra with whitish to cream colored spots or markings. Size range: Male (n = 4) 4.5 x 2.0 mm to 5.1 x 2.2 mm; Female (n = 2) 4.7 x 2.0 mm to 5.7 x 2.2 mm. Head elongate, sub-conical, widest at base, with weak transverse impression near dorsal base, smooth, shiny, punctures minute; frons about ½ as wide as rostral base, smooth, shiny. Rostrum short, about ½ as long as head, widened apically beyond antennal insertions; apex about ½ wider than rostral base; with very minute punctures. Antennae elongate, longer than head and rostrum together; scape and funicle segment 1 ovo-globose; scape more robust; funicle segment 1 slightly shorter than scape; funicle segment 2 slender, clavate, slightly longer than segment 1; funicle segments 3 and 4 slender, clavate, subequal, slightly longer than segment 2; segment 5 shorter, more clavate, subequal to segment 2 in length; segment 6 like 5 but shorter, only about ½ as long as segment 4; segment 7 conical, wider apically, subequal in length to segment 4; club like in texture; club dark, with basal and middle segments subequal; terminal segment slightly longer, acuminate. Pronotum wider than long, widest at base, with distinct weakly v-shaped median transverse groove, smooth, shiny; punctures very minute, sparse; with dark irregular line like markings each side of middle; anterior collar band like, weakly set off; anterior basal carina wide, smooth, band like through middle; posterior basal carina narrow, only about ½ as wide as anterior carina. Scutellum large, sub-triangular, at base about twice as wide as long; smooth, shiny, with very minute punctures; posterior margin broadly rounded. Elytra longer than wide, widest at humeri, slightly narrowed from base to apex; striae small, irregular, weakly impressed; rows indistinct; each elytron with cream colored spots or markings; spot near scutellum large, raised, smooth; spot behind scutellar spot, small, faint; two elongate oval spots just beyond middle; more lateral oval spot larger; lateral mark below humeri extended along elytral margin to elytral apices; long mark along elytral suture extended to elytral apices; humeri distinctly angled. Abdominal ventrites sparsely punctured and sparsely setose.
Femoral sexual dimorphism: The profemur in males is armed with two projections. The disti-ventral projection is beak-shaped with the apex bent and pointed. The mid-ventral projection is similar in size to the disti-ventral projection but is blunt tipped and apically bent upward and inward. An oval setose sensillum is present below the base of the mid-ventral projection. The female profemur is armed only with a small beakshaped disti-ventral projection.
Distribution: The specimens examined are from the Dominican Republic and Haiti.
Comments: This species is identified by the dark irregular markings on each side of the pronotum (figs. 66 & 68). Also, the spots and markings on the elytra are more numerous and more
expansive than in E. aureolus or E. haitensis .
Host plant: Host plant association is unknown.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
PW |
Paleontological Collections |
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.