Jemadia pseudognetus imitator (Mabille, 1891) Zhang & Cong & Shen & Song & Orellana & Brockmann & Mielke & Mielke & Costa & Grishin, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5319.4.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AE993A70-D5C2-46E3-A570-40EF0DB7ECC2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8211462 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AF07C417-FFAC-2D5A-15F7-FD06908DFB73 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Jemadia pseudognetus imitator (Mabille, 1891) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Jemadia pseudognetus imitator (Mabille, 1891) , comb. nov.
Confirming the hypothesis of Mielke, Brockmann, and Mielke (2022), we find that genomic trees place Jemadia hospita imitator (Mabille, 1891) (type locality Colombia: Bogota, lectotype NVG-15029A01 sequenced) with Jemadia pseudognetus (Mabille, 1878) (type locality in Colombia) and away from Jemadia hospita hospita (Butler, 1877) (type locality in Peru) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). We see that J. pseudognetus and J. hospita form separate clades, well differentiated genetically. Their COI barcodes differ by 2.3% (15 bp) and we confirm them as two distinct species. However, within each clade, there is only limited genetic differentiation. For instance, J. h. imitator is not separated from the nominotypical J. pseudognetus in both trees ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Therefore, because there are wing pattern differences between these two taxa, we propose to treat the former as a subspecies of the latter and form new species-subspecies combination Jemadia pseudognetus imitator (Mabille, 1891) , comb. nov. As a result, J. hospita becomes monotypic, and J. pseudognetus is comprised of two subspecies.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |