Amenis pedro O. Mielke & Casagrande, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5319.4.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AE993A70-D5C2-46E3-A570-40EF0DB7ECC2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8211458 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AF07C417-FFAA-2D5C-15F7-FAEB9217F94B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Amenis pedro O. Mielke & Casagrande, 2022 |
status |
stat. nov. |
Amenis pedro O. Mielke & Casagrande, 2022 View in CoL , stat. nov.
Originally proposed as a subspecies, Amenis pionia pedro O. Mielke & Casagrande, 2022 (type locality in Brazil: Bahia, holotype DZ24.624 sequenced), shows notable differences from Amenis pionia pionia (Hewitson, 1857) , both in the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Although their COI barcodes are 1.7–1.8% (11–12 bp) different ( Mielke et al. 2022), they are more likely to be species-level taxa, rather than subspecies, because these differences are comparable to those between Amenis picia Evans, 1951 (type locality in Colombia, Bogota region) and Amenis ponina (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) (type locality in Venezuela: Aragua, neotype DZ36.851 sequenced) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 and COI barcodes 2%, 13 bp different). Note the divergence in the mitochondrial genomes ( Fig. 1b View FIGURE 1 ) is similar in both pairs. Therefore, we propose that it is a species-level taxon Amenis pedro O. Mielke & Casagrande, 2022 , stat. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |