Anthaxia (Cratomerus), Solier, 1833
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9F73B090-1C9A-4247-AD92-B5A83E448922 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5927754 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AD608789-FFDB-E67D-CFDF-FADB30B8FE6C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Anthaxia (Cratomerus) |
status |
|
Subgenus Cratomerus Solier, 1833
Type species: Buprestis cyanicornis Fabricius, 1781 (currently Anthaxia (Cratomerus) hungarica (Scopoli, 1772)) ; subsequent designation by Duponchel, (1844): 328.
Large (5.5–16.0 mm) species with typical colouration: green with silky lustre, pronotum usually with two black, longitudinal, well-defined stripes ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–12 ), elytra of female sometimes green-violet or violet and pronotum often with orange lateral sides ( Figs. 7 View FIGURES 1–12 ); vertex very narrow (0.3–0.6 times as wide as width of eye), frons flat or weakly depressed; pronotum weakly convex, laterally flattened, sculpture consisting of rather rough, polygonal cells with central grains ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 40–54 ), cells often transversely enlarged on disc; male antennomeres widened and terminal antennomeres often bicolorous ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–12 ); elytra flattened, wedge-shaped, with well-developed lateral groove; elytral sculpture dense and homogenous; lateral emargination and subhumeral lobe strongly-developed ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 25–39 ), elytral epipleura wide but not reaching elytral apex; lateral sides of ventrites well-visible from above ( Figs. 6, 7 View FIGURES 1–12 ); male metafemora more or less swollen, rarely simple, male meso- and metatibiae curved often with inner serrations or teeth, sometimes with long, white pubescence ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–12 ); aedeagus slender, spindle-shaped, parameres without lateral spines, median lobe without lateral serrations ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 55–76 ); anal ventrite of female almost always with deeply notched posterior margin.
BIONOMY. Development in broad-leaved trees and shrubs.
DISTRIBUTION: western Palaearctic,with one species in northern China, one in Pakistan and two in Ethiopia. I presume this subgenus to be a typical example of the western Palaearctic fauna, with two closely related species reaching the northernmost part of the Afrotropical region.
Richter (1949) included in this subgenus (genus in his concept) some species of Haplanthaxia and Richteraxia subgen. nov. Actually the division between Cratomerus and Haplanthaxia is rather difficult to determine. There is no single constant character (except for the size and elytral sculpture) which can distinguish the subgenera—the whole set of characters must be taken in consideration.
SPECIES INCLUDED. In reality the subgenus contains only the A. (C.) diadema species-group, A. (C.) hungarica species-group and A. (C.) sponsa species-group; other species-groups mentioned by Bellamy (2008) belong to the subgenera Haplanthaxia or Richteraxia subgen. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |