Laccophilus makay Manuel & Ramahandrison, 2020
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1127.85737 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4759AFC3-2EFD-47A7-853F-645FB32829BA |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/ACDD693E-6E1B-50E3-BE82-FCB09EECE56C |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Laccophilus makay Manuel & Ramahandrison, 2020 |
status |
|
Laccophilus makay Manuel & Ramahandrison, 2020 View in CoL
Type locality.
Madagascar, Toliara, Makay massif, 10.7 km NW of Tsivoky.
Material examined.
8 ♂♂, 7 ♀♀: MAK-3; 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀: MAK-4; 4 ♂♂, 1 ♀: MAK-5A; 3 ♂♂: MAK-5B; 2 ♂♂: MAK-5C; 7 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀: MAK-5D; 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀: MAK-6; 1 ♂, 1 ♀: MAK-7; 11 ♂♂, 9 ♀♀: MAK-8; 2 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀: MAK-10; 13 ♂♂, 6 ♀♀: MAK-14A; 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀: MAK-15; 1 ♂, 1 ♀: MAK-16; 1 ♂, 1 ♀: MAK-25A; 9 ♂♂, 22 ♀♀: MAK-25B; 1 ♂, 1 ♀: MAK-26; 4 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀: MAK-28; 1 ♀: MAK-29; 5 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀: MAK-30; 3 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀: MAK-31A; 5 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀: MAK-31B; 4 ♂♂, 1 ♀: MAK-31C; 12 ♂♂, 20 ♀♀: MAK-32; 1 ♂, 4 ♀♀: MAK-33; 1 ♂: MAK-34A; 2 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀: MAK-34B; 11 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀: MAK-35A; 4 ♂♂: MAK-35B; 5 ♂♂: MAK-35C; 6 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀: MAK-36B; 8 ♂♂, 11 ♀♀: MAK-38A; 1 ♂, 1 ♀: MAK-39A; 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀: MAK-39B; 1 ♂: MAK-44C; 68 exs.: MAK-45; 2 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀: MAK-46; 4 ♂♂, 6 ♀♀: MAK-47; 21 exs.: MAK-49; 130 exs.: MAK-50; 26 exs.: MAK-51; 111 exs.: MAK-52; 108 exs.: MAK-53; 16 ♂♂, 19 ♀♀: MAK-54A; 64 exs: MAK-54B; 8 ♂♂, 1 ♀: MAK-58; 37 exs.: MAK-59A; 5 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀: MAK-59B; 62 exs: MAK-59C.
Distribution.
So far endemic to the Makay massif, Madagascar ( Manuel and Ramahandrison 2020).
Habitat in study area
(Fig. 2D-G, I-N View Figure 2 ). This species was collected only at inner massif sites, in both south-central and northern Makay, where it is by far the most common and abundant species of aquatic Adephaga . It was found in a wide diversity of lentic water bodies (puddles, pools, ponds, a blind river channel, etc.), isolated or with slow water renewal, as well as in very slowly flowing streams. The surrounding environment was forested or semi-forested and free from anthropisation. These habitats were further characterised by sandy bottom (sometimes with stones), various amounts of plant debris, clear water (but often with orange masses of iron bacteria), and marginal vegetation absent or poorly developed.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |