Calleida decora (Fabricius, 1801)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:68FE3835-2401-43A7-96E2-CF26532F7A60 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AC7A58E3-FD0B-F7D9-1171-CDEF5BEA071B |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Calleida decora (Fabricius, 1801) |
status |
|
Calleida decora (Fabricius, 1801)
Carabus decorus Fabricius, 1801: 181 [primary homonym of Carabus decorus Panzer, 1799]. Type locality: «Carolina» (original citation). Syntype(s) location unknown (Zimsen 1964: 53), though according to Motschulsky (1855a: 51) in ZMUC. Note. This name is a junior primary homonym of Carabus decorus Panzer, 1799 (= Bembidion decorum (Panzer, 1799)). Since both names apply to taxa not considered congeneric since 1899, the case is to be referred to the Commission and meanwhile prevailing usage of both names must be maintained (ICZN 1999: Article 23.9.5).
Calleida cordicollis Putzeys, 1845a: 21. Type locality: "Oaxaca, Mexique" (original citation). Holotype [by monotypy] location unknown. Synonymy established by Horn (1882: 161).
Calleida cyanoptera LeConte, 1858b: 59 [primary homonym of Calleida cyanoptera Solier, 1849]. Type locality not stated. Three syntype(s) in MCZ [# 5819]. Synonymy established by Horn (1882: 161).
Callida coeruleipennis Gemminger and Harold, 1868a: 115. Replacement name for Calleida cyanoptera LeConte, 1858.
Distribution.
This species ranges from south-central North Dakota (Burleigh County, Donald P. Schwert pers. comm. 1989) to southeastern Virginia (Hoffman and Roble 2000: 40), south to southern Florida (Peck and Thomas 1998: 24), the Bahamas (Darlington 1953: 11), and Nicaragua (CMNH), west to southern Arizona (Santa Cruz and Pima Counties, CMNH, UASM).
Records.
USA: AL, AR, AZ, FL, GA, IA, IL, IN, KS, LA, MS, NC, ND, NE, OK, SC, SD, TN, TX, VA - Bahamas, Belize, Mexico, Nicaragua
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |