Acumontia rostrata Pocock, 1902
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.210296 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:28EA6439-289E-4CBB-B427-397F6A4B54C0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5662792 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AC3E87F8-6906-4E1B-FF47-FF6B1252BFEE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Acumontia rostrata Pocock, 1902 |
status |
|
Acumontia rostrata Pocock, 1902 View in CoL
( Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 A–B, 13)
Acumontia rostrata Pocock 1902: 405 View in CoL , fig. 82A (part, 3 only); Pocock 1903: 441, pl. 11, figs. 2–2a (penis); Staręga 1992: 281. Triacumontia rostrata: Roewer 1915: 123 View in CoL , fig. 32; Roewer 1923: 613, fig. 768; Lawrence 1959: 44.
Type data. 3 holotype, ( BMNH, examined), from MADAGASCAR, [FIANARANTSOA], Ambohimitombo, Tanala district.
Notes. Pocock (1902) originally described and illustrated males and females (with metatarsal notch!) of this species. The females resulted to be males of A. echinata , while the males were conserved in A. rostrata ( Pocock 1903) . Pocock (1903) also mentioned that the males did not have a metatarsal notch and provided a [too] schematic illustration of the penis. Roewer (1915; 1923) transferred this species to Triacumontia and repeated Pocock’s illustration of the male lateral habitus. Lawrence (1959) did not bring any new information, while Staręga (1992) brought it back to Acumontia .
Diagnosis. Differs from A. alluaudi , A. armata , A. capitata , A. cowani , A. echinata , A. flavispina and A. majori by spines of anterior margin with size similar to the processes of cheliceral sockets. Differs from A. soerenseni by two spines on lateral side of anterior margin instead of one. Differs from A. cowani by having the two pairs of spines of areas II–III with size comparable to the armature of ocularium. Differs from A.majori and A. roberti by the spines of area III widely separated at base and divergent from each other. Differs from A. pococki and A. roeweri by the large spines on free tergites. Differs from A nigra , A. spinifrons and A. venator by median pair of spines on free tergite I. Differs from A. alluaudi , A. capitata , A. cowani , A. flavispina , A. hispida , A. horrida , A. hystrix , A. longipes , A. milloti , A. remyi and A. succinea sp. nov. by the shape of the two ventro-basal apophyses of the femur of pedipalps blunt instead of spiniform. Differs from A. alluaudi , A. flavispina , A. hispida , A. horrida and A. succinea sp. nov. by having five tarsomeres in tarsus I of male. Very similar to A. roberti , differing by the trochanter of pedipalp dorsally unarmed, and by the small tubercles on the anterior margin of carapace.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Acumontia rostrata Pocock, 1902
Mendes, Amanda C. & Kury, Adriano B. 2012 |
Acumontia rostrata
Starega 1992: 281 |
Lawrence 1959: 44 |
Roewer 1923: 613 |
Roewer 1915: 123 |
Pocock 1903: 441 |
Pocock 1902: 405 |