Yaginumaella zabkai Wang, Mi & Peng, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.902.2319 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AB1DF6AF-AD7B-401F-ACD5-A76C3C2E5A4D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10164983 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/518666B8-AD14-4035-93B2-5531B3F4BA0F |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:518666B8-AD14-4035-93B2-5531B3F4BA0F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Yaginumaella zabkai Wang, Mi & Peng |
status |
sp. nov. |
Yaginumaella zabkai Wang, Mi & Peng sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:518666B8-AD14-4035-93B2-5531B3F4BA0F
Figs 54–55 View Fig View Fig , 57 View Fig
Diagnosis
The male of Yaginumaella zabkai Wang, Mi & Peng sp. nov. resembles that of Y. dali Shao, Li & Yang, 2014 in the general shape of habitus and copulatory organs, but it can be distinguished by the following: (1) the embolus being acutely narrowed at distal end ( Fig. 54B View Fig ), whereas tapered in Y. dali ( Shao et al. 2014: fig. 4); (2) the RTA being about 1.5 times as long as tibia ( Fig. 54C View Fig ), whereas almost as long as tibia in Y. dali ( Shao et al. 2014: fig. 5). The female also resembles that of Y. dali in the general shape of epigyne, but it can be distinguished by the distance between the epigynal hoods, which is less than their width ( Fig. 55A View Fig ), whereas about 1.5 times as great as their width in Y. dali ( Shao et al. 2014: fig. 2).
Etymology
The specific name is a patronym in honor of Professor M. Żabka, who contributed significantly to the taxonomy of jumping spiders; noun (name) in genitive case.
Type material
Holotype
CHINA • ♂; Yunnan, Jingdong County, Taizhong Township, Dujuanhu ; 24°31.22′ N, 100°56.56′ E; 1504 m a.s.l.; 15 Aug. 2015; X.Q. Mi leg.; TRU-JS 0579 . GoogleMaps
Paratypes
CHINA • 2 ♀♀, 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; TRU-JS 0580–0582 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀, 1 ♂; Nanjian County, Yongcui Township , Fenghuang Mountain; 24°55.99′ N, 100°22.51′ E; 1850 m a.s.l.; 13 Aug. 2015; X.Q. Mi leg.; TRU-JS 0583–0584 GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total length 4.61. Carapace 2.12 long, 1.75 wide. Abdomen 2.40 long, 1.68 wide. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.50, ALE 0.29, PLE 0.26, AERW 1.58, PERW 1.50, EFL 1.02. Legs: I 4.84 (1.53, 0.63, 1.25, 0.88, 0.55), II 4.18 (1.28, 0.75, 1.05, 0.65, 0.45), III 4.79 (1.45, 0.75, 1.03, 1.01, 0.55), IV 5.06 (1.50, 0.70, 1.15, 1.13, 0.58).
HABITUS. Carapace yellow to red-brown, setose, with pair of marginal yellow bands, and longitudinal, yellow band extending across thorax; fovea longitudinal, linear, dark red ( Fig. 55C, F View Fig ). Chelicerae yellow, with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth ( Fig. 55G View Fig ). Legs yellow, with dark stripes on femora I, three, and two pairs of ventral macrosetae on tibiae and metatarsi I, respectively. Abdomen elongate-oval, dorsum yellow to dark brown, dotted laterally, with longitudinal yellow stripe anteromedially; venter pale yellow to brown, with longitudinal, irregular dark stripe medially ( Fig. 55C–D View Fig ).
PALP. Tibia wider than long, with straight, strongly sclerotized RTA about 1.5 times as long as its length and rather pointed apically; cymbium setose; bulb elongate-oval, swollen medio-posteriorly, with small posterior lobe curved towards postero-prolaterally; embolus strongly sclerotized, originates at about 9 o’clock position of bulb, curved into C-shape, and acutely narrowed distally ( Fig. 54 View Fig ).
Female (paratype, TRU-JS 0580)
MEASUREMENTS. Total length 5.28. Carapace 2.28 long, 1.88 wide. Abdomen 3.32 long, 2.20 wide. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.55, ALE 0.36, PLE 0.32, AERW 1.76, PERW 1.72, EFL 1.12. Legs: I 4.36 (1.45, 0.75, 0.88, 0.75, 0.53), II 3.94 (1.25, 0.63, 0.93, 0.65, 0.48), III 4.74 (1.50, 0.75, 0.93, 1.01, 0.55), IV 5.20 (1.63, 0.63, 1.13, 1.23, 0.58).
HABITUS. Similar to that of male ( Fig. 55E View Fig ).
EPIGYNE. Slightly longer than wide; atrium oval, anteriorly located, with pair of arc-shaped lateral ridges, followed by pair of hoods separated from each other less than their width; copulatory openings beneath atrial ridges; copulatory ducts long, curved and twisted; spermathecae indistinct; fertilization ducts lamellar, transversely extending ( Fig. 55A–B View Fig ).
Distribution
China (Yunnan) ( Fig. 57 View Fig ).
Discussion
Including the species described in the present work, the list of Chinese jumping spiders has increased to at least 651 species in 136 genera, representing about one-tenth, and one-fifth of the worldwide jumping spiders in number of species and genera, respectively, and far exceeding those of adjacent countries such as India (349 species in 110 genera), Vietnam (157 species in 69 genera) and Japan (149 species in 70 genera) ( Metzner 2023). However, it is certain that our current knowledge does not represent the true diversity of Chinese jumping spiders, as most of the Chinese regions remains poorly studied and taxonomic studies are very limited. The taxonomic study of jumping spiders from Xishuangbanna is a convincing example. Before 2016, Xishuangbanna, like most regions of China, was known only from several sporadic described species, but thanks to the conduction of “All Species Inventory” of spiders from the Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, the number of known species in this region has risen to 145, including 58 new to science.According to the prediction of the eventual total number of Chinese spider species by Li (2020), the true diversity of Chinese jumping spiders will reach ca 1500 species. It might be expected most of them will be discovered in southern China, especially the tropical area and southwest mountain area. Among those, some large tribes, and some leaf-litter dwellers genera will present a very high diversity.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |