Scaphoideus rostratus, Chen, Fangying, Dai, Wu & Zhang, Yalin, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3904.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EA840547-EE36-43E3-9FFE-90C055112BD6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6120697 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A6352B3D-CB2C-9538-378D-2583FBBB5518 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scaphoideus rostratus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Scaphoideus rostratus View in CoL sp.nov.
( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 E, J, O, 3B, 8A–G)
Coloration and structure ( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 E, J, O, 3B) similar to those of albovittatus Matsumura , but slightly lighter in colour. Head narrower than pronotum, triangularly produced in front, bluntly angled, longer than inter-ocular width ( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 E, 3B). Forewing with three reflexed veins, none basad of outer anteapical cell ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 E, J).
Male genitalia. Pygofer in lateral aspect tapering posteriorly, with dorsal margin straight and ventral margin convexly rounded, with two subapical tufts of long setae in addition to scattered short setae ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 A, B). Valve semicircular. Subgenital plate triangular and broad basally, with single basal macroseta in addition to few hairlike setae ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 C). Style with anterior part broad, preapical lobe not developed, apical process strongly laterally curved and tapered to acute apex ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 C, D). Connective Y-shaped, arm well developed longer than stem; posterior processes in dorsal aspect of uniform width in basal half, triangularly widened before apex (apex broken in holotype and shape unknown) gradually narrowed to apex; in lateral aspect bent dorsally at base, then curved and directed ventad ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 C, E). Aedeagus with well developed dorsal apodeme, shaft robust and short, strongly compressed, with apex tapered and curved dorsally, gonopore apical on ventral surface ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 F, G).
Measurements. Male 5.4mm long, 1.1mm wide across eyes.
Etymology. The specific epithet ‘ rostratus ’ refers to the shape of apex of the aedeagal shaft from lateral view in this species.
Material examined. 1♂, Yunnan Prov., Jiangcheng, 25April 1982, Jin Gentao (SEM).
Remarks. The new species is similar to S. albovittatus , but can be differentiated from the latter by the pygofer side short, 1.5 times as high as long (state length in S. albovittatus for comparison); aedeagal shaft strongly compressed and the width being 2/3 of the length (state length in S. albovittatus ). The apices of the connective processes and one of the subgenital plates are broken near the tip in the holotype male.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |