Leptus (Leptus) tridentatus Saboori, Hakimitabar & Khademi, 2018

Saboori, Alireza, Hartmannh, Matthias, Hakimitabar, Masoud, Khademi, Narjes & Katouzian, Ahmad-Reza, 2018, Description of a new species of the genus Leptus (Acari: Erythraeidae) from Iran and new data for two Abrolophus species, Acarologia 58 (3), pp. 746-753 : 747-752

Leptus (Leptus) tridentatus Saboori, Hakimitabar & Khademi n. sp.

( Figs. 1-3 )

Zoobank: 2871C554-EC3F-478F-AA19-5758851205EC

Diagnosis — With three denticles on dorsal part of palpal tibial claw; palpal femur with one and palpal genu with two setae; fn Fe = 3-3-2; ∼30–44 setae between coxae II & III; Ti III

<225.

Description — Larva (N = 4) — Idiosoma oval in shape, and with∼170–204 barbed setae. Scutum longer than or equal with wide, punctate, with two pairs of sensilla and two pairs of scutalae, anterior border deeply concave ( Fig. 1 ), ASens and PSens barbed on distal 1/3; cuticular lines around bases of PSens, and parallel conjunct to posterolateral borders, also narrow cuticular lines beyond bases of ASens ( Fig. 1A ); AL longer than PL. One eye on each side of scutum, both circular in shape and 24–30 across.

Ventral surface of idiosoma with barbed sternalae; 2 barbed sternalae between coxae I, 6–7 barbed sternalae between coxae II;∼30–44 barbed intercoxalae between coxae II and III and ∼46–56 barbed setae behind coxae III. Sternalae 1a longer than other sternalae ( Fig. 1B ).

Coxae I-III each with one seta, coxa I with a peg-like supracoxal seta; coxalae 1b about twice the length of coxalae 2b; coxalae 3b longer than coxalae 2b; all coxalae barbed ( Fig. 2 ). NDV = ∼272–287.

Gnathosoma narrow and cone-shaped, 173–210 long with barbed and thick galealae (Ga) and two pairs of hypostomalae, anterior hypostomalae (aHy) smooth, small and peg-like, posterior hypostomalae (pHy) thicker, stronger and barbed. Palpal femur with one and palpal genu with two barbed setae. Palpal tibia with three barbed setae, palpal tibial claw with 3 small denticles on dorsal side ( Fig. 1C ). Palpal tarsus with 8 setae including 4 barbed and 2 nude setae, a solenidion, and an eupathidium. Palpal setal formula: fPp= 0-B-BB-BBB-4B2Nωζ ( Fig. 3 ). Supracoxal seta of palp (eP) peg-like, 5 long. Chelicerae, subcapitulum and palps with punctation. Length of legs I-III 723‒769, 637‒660 and 802‒848, respectively. IP = 1944–2239. Measurements are given in Table 1.

Leg segmentation formula: 7–7–7. Leg setal formula: Leg Ι: Ta– 1ω, 1ε, 2ζ, 27–28B; Ti–

2φ, 1κ, 14B; Ge– 1σ, 1κ, 8B; TFe– 5B; BFe– 3B; Tr– 1B; Cx– 1B ( Figs. 2 A , 3A ).

Leg ΙΙ: Ta– 1ω, 1ε, 2ζ, 25–26B; Ti– 2φ, 1κ, 15B; Ge–1σ, 1κ, 8B; TFe– 5B; BFe– 3B; Tr– 1B,

Cx– 1B ( Figs. 2B , 3B ).

Leg ΙΙΙ: Ta– 1ζ, 25–26B; Ti– 1φ, 15B; Ge– 8B; TFe– 5B; BFe– 2B; Tr– 1B; Cx– 1B ( Figs. 2C ,

3C ). Coxa III abnormally with two setae on left side. Tarsal claws slender, anterior and middle pointed, posterior with long onychotrichs.

Etymology — Name of the new species is derived from three small denticles on palpal tibial claw.

Type material — The holotype larva (ARS–20090703–1a) and paratype larvae (ARS– 20090703–1b, 1c, 1d) were collected by Masoud Hakimitabar, under the stones (off host) from Damavand Mountain, Tehran Province, Iran, 9 July 2009. The specimens are deposited in Acarological Collection, Jalal Afshar Zoological Museum, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

Remarks — Leptus (L.) tridentatus Saboori, Hakimitabar & Khademi n. sp. is unique in having 3 denticles on dorsal side of palpal tibial claw. Also, it is unique in having the following combination of characters: palpal femur with one and palpal genu with two setae and basifemoral setae formula 3‒3‒2. There is one species, L. (L.) maldonadoicus with the basifemoral setae formula 3‒3‒2. It differs from L. (L.) maldonadoicus in the number of setae on palpal femur (1 vs. 2), number of setae between coxae I-II (6 vs. 0), number of setae between coxae II-III (∼30–44 vs. 6), number of setae behind coxae III (∼46–56 vs. 22), longer SD (109–126 vs. 64– ∼76), W (109–116 vs. ∼84–86), AW (87–94 vs. 74–76), PW (97–109

vs. 76), ISD (47–57 vs. 40–42), Ti I (144–180 vs. 106–112), Ti II (116–124 vs. 82–94), Ti III (188–215 vs. 130–134), leg I (723–769 vs. 484–502), leg II (637–660 vs. 394–406), and leg III (802–848 vs. 502–520). It is closely related to L. (L.) dubius (Paoli, 1937) , L. (L.) pyrenaeus André, 1953 , L. (L.) josifovi Beron, 1975 , L. (L.) guus Haitlinger, 1990 , L. (L.) mogadoranus Haitlinger, 1990 , L. (L.) ogazulacus Haitlinger, 1990 , L. (L.) pasopaicus Haitlinger, 1990 , L. (L.) comosus Southcott, 1991 , L. (L.) bertoldi Haitlinger, 1993 , and L. (L.) batoricus Haitlinger, 1998 , according to the setal counts on palpal genu and palpal femur. It differs L. (L.) dubius in the number of setae between coxae II (6–7 vs. 2), number of setae between coxae II &

III (∼30–44 vs. 8–10), shape of scutum, SD (109–126 vs. 90), W (109–116 vs. 90), AW

(87–94 vs. 74), PW (97–109 vs. 81), Ti I (144–180 vs. 128), Ti II (116–131 vs. 96), and Ti

III (188–215 vs. 154); from L. (L.) pyrenaeus in the number of setae between coxae II (6–7 vs. 2), number of setae between coxae II & III (∼30–44 vs. 14–16), SD (109–126 vs. 57), W (109–116 vs. 83), AW (87–94 vs. 64), PW (97–109 vs. 79), AL (45–54 vs. 25), PL (42–47

vs. 25), 1b (60–64 vs. 110), 2b (22–30 vs. 80), and 3b (27–35 vs. 80); from L. (L.) josifovi in the number of setae between coxae II (6–7 vs. 2), number of setae between coxae II & III (∼30–44 vs. 15), AL (45–54 vs. 63), 3b (27–35 vs. 45), and shape of scutum; from L. (L.) guus in the number of setae between coxae II & III (∼30–44 vs. 20), SD (109–126 vs. 100–102), W (109–116 vs. 142–154), AW (87–94 vs. 124–132), PW (97–109 vs. 136–146), GL (176–210

vs. 244–288), Ti I (144–180 vs. 210), Ti II (116–131 vs. 186–192), and Ti III (188–215 vs.

324); from L. (L.) mogadoranus in the number of setae between coxae II (6–7 vs. 2), number of setae between coxae II & III (∼30–44 vs. ∼20), shape of scutum, SD (109–126 vs. 82–92), W

(109–116 vs. 134–146), AW (87–94 vs. 110–118), PW (97–109 vs. 122–130), Ti I (144–180

vs. 312), Ti II (116–131 vs. 254), and Ti III (188–215 vs. 362); from L. (L.) ogazulacus in the number of setae between coxae II (6–7 vs. 2), number of setae between coxae II & III (∼30–44 vs. 22), shape of scutum, SD (109–126 vs. 80–82), W (109–116 vs. 100–102), AL (45–54 vs.

64–72), and PL (42–47 vs. 52–56); from L. (L.) pasopaicus in the number of setae between coxae II (6–7 vs. 2), number of setae between coxae II & III (∼30–44 vs. 16), shape of scutum, SD (109–126 vs. 72), W (109–116 vs. 94), GL (176–210 vs. 142), ASens (47–52 vs. 40),

and PSens (74–92 vs. 64); from L. (L.) comosus in the number of normal setae on basifemora (3-3-2 vs. 3-2-2), number of solenidia on TFe I (0 vs. 3), on TFe II (0 vs. 4), on Ge II (1 vs.

4–5), on TFe III (0 vs. 6–7), on Ge III (0 vs. 6), longer leg I (723–769 vs. 590), leg II (637–669

vs. 540), and leg III (802–848 vs. 600); from L. (L.) bertoldi in the number of setae between coxae II (6–7 vs. 2), shape of scutum, SD (109–126 vs. 66–68), SD ≥ W in L. (L.) tridentatus Saboori, Hakimitabar & Khademi n. sp. (vs. SD <W in L. (L.) bertoldi ), AL (45–54 vs. 70), PL (42–47 vs. 60–62), 1b (60–64 vs. 90), GL (176–210 vs. 244), Ti I (144–180 vs. 332), Ti II (116–131 vs. 258–264), and Ti III (188–215 vs. 384); from L. (L.) batoricus in the number of setae between coxae II (6–7 vs. 2), number of setae between coxae II & III (∼ 30–44 vs. ∼18), Ti I (144–180 vs. 114), Ti II (116–131 vs. 100), and Ti III (188–215 vs. 150), fD (∼170–204

vs. 86), number of setae behind coxae III (∼46–56 vs. ∼32).

Figures

Figure 1 Leptus (Leptus) tridentatus Saboori, Hakimitabar & Khademin. sp. (larva): A – Dorsal view of idiosoma; B – Ventral view of idiosoma; C – Gnathosoma (Left, dorsal view; Right, ventral view).

Figure 2 Leptus (Leptus) tridentatus Saboori, Hakimitabar & Khademin. sp. (larva): A – Tr I-Ti I; B – Tr II-Ti II; C –. Tr III-Ti III.

Figure 3 Leptus (Leptus) tridentatus Saboori, Hakimitabar & Khademin. sp. (larva): A – Ta I; B – Ta II; C – Ta III.