Endecous (Pedroecous) troglobius, Castro-Souza & Zefa & Ferreira, 2020

Castro-Souza, Rodrigo Antônio, Zefa, Edison & Ferreira, Rodrigo Lopes, 2020, New troglobitic and troglophilic syntopic species of Endecous (Orthoptera, Grylloidea, Phalangopsidae) from a Brazilian cave: a case of sympatric speciation?, Zootaxa 4810 (2), pp. 271-304 : 285-293

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4810.2.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DB94D939-E14D-483F-BADC-CEF775C6B56C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10499571

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A276D520-027B-DB53-5AE9-B7056126D7CB

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Endecous (Pedroecous) troglobius
status

sp. nov.

Endecous (Pedroecous) troglobius n. sp.

( Figures 36, 41–43, 44–46, 47–55, 56–59, 60–65, 66–73, 74 View FIGURE 34, 74 , 78–80, 84–86 View FIGURES 75–86 , 88 View FIGURES 87–88 , 97, 99, 100–101 View FIGURES 96–101 , 107 View FIGURE 107 , Tables 2, 4 –6).

Material Examined: Holotype, ♂, ISLA 77744, Brazil, Minas Gerais State, municipality of Luislândia, found in the deepest regions of the Lapa Sem Fim cave (16° 08’ 55”W, 44° 37’ 40”S), 06.ix.2017, R. L. Ferreira, leg. GoogleMaps Holotype condition: head, left legs I, II, III, and right tegmen were detached, and maintained in holotype’s tube . Paratypes, 2 ♂♂, 17.iv.2014, ( ISLA 12337; 12339), R. L. Ferreira, leg. ; 1 ♂, 18.iv.2017, ( ISLA 43342), R. L. Ferreira, leg. ; 2 ♂♂, 06.ix.2017, ( ISLA 77745; 77746), R. L. Ferreira, leg. ; 1 ♀, 17.iv.2014, ( ISLA 77747), R. L. Ferreira, leg. ; 2 ♀♀, 18.iv.2017, ( ISLA 43343; 46634), R. L. Ferreira, leg. , all specimens collected in the same locality of holotype .

Distribution: Deeper portions of the Lapa Sem Fim cave ( Fig. 107 View FIGURE 107 ), municipality of Luislândia, Minas Gerais State, Brazil ( Fig. 1A, B View FIGURE 1 ).

Etimology: Specific epithet “ troglobius ”, from ancient greek τρώγλη (trṓglç, “hole”) + βίος (bíos, “life”) + –ite, refers to the term ‘troglobite’, designated for obligate subterranean species.

Diagnosis. Combination of the following characteristics: phallic complex short, and wide in general view in comparison to E. (P.) didymus n. sp. ( Figs 78–80, 84–86 View FIGURES 75–86 ); pseudepiphallic membranous shield short ( Fig. 42 View FIGURE 34, 74 , Ps.ms); pseudepiphallic dorsal branch long, hook-shaped, rounded at apex, and with projections more curved inward and closer to each other in comparison to E. (P.) didymus n. sp. ( Figs 41, 45–46 View FIGURE 34, 74 , Ps.db); pseudepiphallic arm field developed in comparison to E. (P.) didymus n. sp. ( Figs 84–86 View FIGURES 75–86 , blue slice); ectophallic arc well developed, U-shaped in ventral and previously inclined in dorsal view ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 34, 74 , Ect.Arc); endophallus developed ( Figs 44–46 View FIGURE 34, 74 , End.Sc.a, yellow arrow indicates the apodeme); compound eyes with unpigmented ommatidia ( Figs 48–49 View FIGURE 34, 74 , 88 View FIGURES 87–88 ); body is lighter than E. (P.) didymus n. sp. ( Fig. 97 View FIGURES 96–101 ); courtship song dominant frequence (DF) with an interval covering larger values compared to E. (P.) didymus n. sp., 3.8–4.0 kHz (max-min), n = 4 ( Tab. 3).

Description, male holotype. Body color. The specimen designated as a holotype was reared in the laboratory, thus receiving light during observation periods, what caused an increase in tegumentar pigmentation when compared to individuals from natural populations inhabiting an aphotic zones: dorsal head, pronotum and right tegmen yellowish-orange pale ( Figs 47–52 View FIGURE 34, 74 ), white ventrally, abdomen yellow pale ( Figs 52–53 View FIGURE 34, 74 ), entire legs brownish, except femora base whitish which is more advanced and pale in comparison to E. (P.) didymus n. sp. ( Figs 56–59 View FIGURE 34, 74 ), cerci uniformly yellow pale. Head ( Figs 47–49 View FIGURE 34, 74 ), thorax ( Figs 50, 52, 56–59 View FIGURE 34, 74 ) and abdomen ( Figs 52–55 View FIGURE 34, 74 ) with morphological description similar to E. (P.) didymus n. sp. as shown in the figures ( Figs 8–9, 10, 12 View FIGURES 8-15 , 16–19 View FIGURES 16-19 , 13–15 View FIGURES 8-15 ). Differing only in the following characteristics: head less elongated in frontal view (3.7 mm length and 2.9 mm width); gena, clypeus, frons, labrum, mandibles, maxilar and labial palpomeres more whitish in conparasion to E. (P.) didymus n. sp.; compound eyes with unpigmented ommatidia ( Figs 47–49 View FIGURE 34, 74 ). Thorax. Pronotum more pubescent compared to E. (P.) didymus n. sp. ( Figs 50 and 52 View FIGURE 34, 74 ). Right tegmen ( Figs 51, 60 View FIGURE 34, 74 ), mirror oval with two crossveins and three cells; harp with three well marked crossveins, and four cells, the first proximal cell has two small reticular veins in diagonal; lateral field marked by 11 reticular accessory veins bifurcated and connected by retucular veins to each other; basal field with veins 1A, 2A and 3A well-marked, with two secondary veins connected to CU 2, the second is less distinct; 3A veins bifurcated ( Figs 51 and 60 View FIGURE 34, 74 ); stridulatory file with 64 teeth. Abdomen: cerci shorter (12.1 mm ± 1.9 mm); supranal and subgenital plate unpigmented ( Figs 53–55 View FIGURE 34, 74 ).

Observations in Paratypes

Male phallic sclerites (paratype, ISLA 43342, Figs 41–46 View FIGURE 34, 74 , 79, 85 View FIGURES 75–86 ). The morphological description of this structure is similar to E. (P.) didymus n. sp., however, has the following differences: phallic complex slightly wider ( Figs 41, 46 View FIGURE 34, 74 ). Pseudepiphallus: arm more curved inward ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 34, 74 , Ps.Arm); pseudepiphallic dorsal projections more curved inward and closer to each other ( Figs 41, 45–46 View FIGURE 34, 74 , Ps.db); pseudepiphallic sclerite inner bars forming a dorsal arc, with each bar projected straight to the median region, and not fused with each other ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 34, 74 , Ps.ib). Ectophallic invagination: ectophallic lateral bar slightly inclined ( Figs 45 View FIGURE 34, 74 , Ect.lb). Endophallus: apodeme a little more dilated ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 34, 74 , End.Sc.a, yellow arrow indicates the apodeme).

Variations in phallic sclerites (paratypes, n = 3, ISLA 43342; 77745 and 77746; Figs 78–80, 84–86 View FIGURES 75–86 ). It presents the same types of variations highlighted for the size and the ectophallic apodeme (Ect.Ap) in E. (P.) didymu s n. sp. Furthermore, the internal angle average of the pseudepiphallic dorsal branch calculated from the proximal to the distal portion, close to sixty degrees (59.55° ± 3.29°) ( Figs 78–80 View FIGURES 75–86 ); dorsal field of pseudepiphallic arm pronounced (0.056 mm 2 ± 0.013 mm 2, n = 3) ( Figs 84–86 View FIGURES 75–86 ).

Male right tegmen ( Figs 54-59 View FIGURE 34, 74 ). Stridulatory file with 67 ± 6.4 teeth (n = 6); mirror: relatively conserved in this species ( Figs 61–63, 65 View FIGURE 34, 74 ); however, a small cell within the second distal cell may be present ( Fig. 64 View FIGURE 34, 74 ); harp: one to two poorly marked diagonal veins may be present among cells or ramifying the main crossvein, in the first distal or proximal cells ( Figs 61–62, 64–65 View FIGURE 34, 74 ); three to four well marked crossveins; basal field: one to two vertical or diagonal crossveins can be present, forming two small cells jointed with CU 2 ( Figs 63–64 View FIGURE 34, 74 ); reticular branches can be present between the veins 1A and 2A; lateral field: with well marked accessory crossvein bifurcated ( Figs 61, 64–65 View FIGURE 34, 74 ) or with many reticular veins distributed between well-marked veins ( Figs 62–63 View FIGURE 34, 74 ).

Female: same size and coloration to the male (µ = 19.97 mm ± 0.38 mm; n = 2) ( Fig. 99 View FIGURES 96–101 ); supranal and subgenital plate whitish ( Figs 67 – 68 View FIGURE 34, 74 ); ovipositor shorter than the cerci (µ = 11.131 mm ± 0.221 mm) ( Figs 66 – 70 View FIGURE 34, 74 ); the other structures have the same morphology observed to the females of E. (P.) didymus n. sp. Female genitalia ( ISLA 43343). Copulatory papilla of similar morphology compared to E. (P.) didymus n. sp. ( Fig. 71 View FIGURE 34, 74 ).

Variations in copulatory papilla (paratypes, n = 2, ISLA 46634 and 77747) similar to that observed in E. (P.) didymus n. sp. ( Figs 72 – 73 View FIGURE 34, 74 ).

Courtship song of Endecous troglobius n. sp. ( Fig. 74 View FIGURE 34, 74 , Tab. 3). Male sends intermittent phrases composed of 4 to 30 subphrases, varying from 4.6 to 43s, respectively, and subphrases ranging from 0.011 to 0.078s; the subphrase period range from 0.9 to 2.3s; and the number of sound waves show high variation comparing first and second pulses of the subphrase, 24–61 and 32–60, respectively.

Chromosomes of E. troglobius n. sp. ( Fig. 36 View FIGURE 34, 74 ; Tab. 4). Diploid chromosome number of 2n = 21, X0 ♂ /XX ♀, with the same chromosome morphology as E. (P.) didymus n. sp. as well as in secondary constrictions position and satellite size. There is same minor variation in the centromeric index among new species.

Male and Female measurements. Tables 2 and 4.

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF