Chydaeus loeffleri tibetanus, Kataev & Schmidt, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4686.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:150C323C-8AAA-499B-8B98-7C8B227BD055 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5940408 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A1734F61-D012-6027-FF46-FB00F6A8FE63 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chydaeus loeffleri tibetanus |
status |
subsp. nov. |
Chydaeus loeffleri tibetanus View in CoL ssp. n.
( Figs 3 View FIGURES 1–5 , 26–30 View FIGURES 26–30 )
Type material. Holotype: ♂, labelled “ Tibet: Rongshar Valley . 11,000 ft. 28.VI.1924. Maj. R.W.G. Hingston. ”, “ Harpalus irvinei Andr. Cotype (var.) H.E. Andrewes det.”, and “ PARALECTOTYPUS Harpalus irvinei Andrewes , des. Kataev & Schmidt, 2019” ( NHML).
Description (male, female unknown). Body length 7.1 mm, width 3.2 mm. Habitus as in Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–5 . Characters as described for Ch. loeffleri loeffleri except as follows:
Head without fine micropunctation, HWmax/PWmax 0.76 and HWmin/PWmax 0.66. Fronto-clypeal suture thin, not deepened at middle. Labrum moderately deeply emarginate anteriorly.
Pronotum: PWmax/PL 1.50, WPmax/WPmin 1.18, almost impunctate, with fine dense punctation restricted to very narrow area along sides and with few indistinct punctures in basal fovea. Area just at basal angles depressed and separated from somewhat deep basal foveae by convexity.
Elytra: EL/EW 1.36, EL/PL 2.64 and EW/PWmax 1.29. Humeral denticle not recognized. Subapical sinuation very shallow, sutural angle narrowly rounded at apex. Marginal umbilicate series consisting of five or six basal and of six apical pores.
Legs. Additional large medial setigerous pore present only on left metacoxae. Tarsomere 5 with two pairs of latero-ventral setae. Pro- and mesotarsi (in male) similar to those in the nominative subspecies ( Figs 29, 30 View FIGURES 26–30 ).
Aedeagus. Median lobe ( Figs 27, 28 View FIGURES 26–30 ) relatively slightly longer (MLL/L 0.24) and with narrower terminal lamella ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 26–30 ) than that in Ch. loeffleri .
Etymology. The name of the subspecies is derived from the name of the region where this taxon occurs.
Distribution ( Fig. 38 View FIGURE 38 , ‘ red square’). Rongshar Valley (= upper Tama Koshi Valley) in the Inner Himalaya of Tibet, immediately north of eastern Central Tibet, and northerly adjacent to the Rolwaling Himal.
Remarks. This taxon is geographically separated from Ch. loeffleri loeffleri by the mountain range of the Rolwaling Himal. Although only one male is available, some peculiarities in its external morphology (particularly very limited pronotal punctation) and male genitalia are sufficient, in our opinion, to treat it as a separate taxon. Similarity between the male from the Rongshar Valley and the specimens of Ch. loeffleri from the Rolwaling Valley in many distinctive characters including of median lobe of aedeagus argues for its subspecific status within the latter species, although additional collecting in this valley is needed to verify this conclusion. This subspecies should perhaps also include the specimens previously examined in the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing from the upper Bhote Koshi Valley in southern Tibet, about 40 km west of the Rongshar (= Tama Koshi) Valley ( Fig. 38 View FIGURE 38 , yellow square) and determined as Ch. irvinei ( Kataev et al., 2012) , but this material should be reexamined since the species of the irvinei group were found to have very local distributions.
NHML |
Natural History Museum, Tripoli |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |