Pilophorus erraticus Linnavuori, 1962
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4942.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CDF398FE-B0F6-40E6-967D-FB857C1565BD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4596039 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A16ADB37-EB0D-0C74-FF47-C4A37F32FE05 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2021-03-11 07:21:01, last updated 2024-11-26 07:14:17) |
scientific name |
Pilophorus erraticus Linnavuori, 1962 |
status |
|
Pilophorus erraticus Linnavuori, 1962 View in CoL
( Figs 2A View FIGURE 2 ̅B, 11B, 12A̅B, 14E–K)
Pilophorus erraticus Linnavuori, 1962: 170 View in CoL (n. sp., desc.); Schuh, 2002 –2013, online catalog; Aukema, 2018, online catalog; Urayama et al. 2019: 79, fig. 2C (faunal list); Yamamoto & Yasunaga, 2020: 81 (faunal list).
Pilophorus miyamotoi View in CoL (nec Linnavuori 1961: 165): Yasunaga et al. 1993: pl. 5, fig. 9.
Material examined. Holotype (♂). JAPAN: Honshu, Shinano [Nagano Pref.], Karuizawa , 36.36, 138.55, 3 Aug 1959, S. Miyamoto ( AMNH) ( AMNH _ PBI 00140174 About AMNH ) . Additional material. JAPAN: Hokkaido: Otaru City, Oshoro Shinto-shrine , 43.209, 140.861, 16 Aug 2001, A. Yamamoto, 1 ♂ ( OMO) GoogleMaps ; Sapporo City, Ainosato , 43.167, 141.410, Ulmus davidiana , 24 Aug 2001, T. Ogita, 1 ♀ ( TYCN) GoogleMaps ; same data except for date 6 Sep 2001, 1 ♀ ( TYCN) GoogleMaps ; same locality, Maackia amurensis , 10 Aug 2001, T. Ogita, 1 ♂ ( TYCN) GoogleMaps . Honshu : Tokyo, Meguro-ku , Tokyo Univ. Komaba Campus , 35.06006, 139.68521, 22 Jun – 15 Aug 2013, T GoogleMaps . Ishikawa, 1 ♂ 4 ♀ ( TUA) . Kyushu : Nagasaki City , Nagasaki West High School , 32.765907, 129.859517, Ficus superba , 4 Jun 2020, T. Yasunaga, 4 ♂ 3 ♀ ( TYCN) (1 ♂ with USIs, 00380664) GoogleMaps ; Nagasaki City, Kawaguchi Park , 32.766964, 129.863641, Zelkova serrata , 14 Jun 2018, T. Yasunaga, 3 ♀ ( TYCN) GoogleMaps ; same data, except for date 6–10 Jun 2019, T. Yasunaga, 2 ♂ 2 ♀ ( TYCN) GoogleMaps ; Nagasaki Pref., Tsushima Island, Izuhara Town, Isaribi Park , 34.2055, 129.2985, Artemisia sp., 25 Jun 2020, H. Asanabe, 1 ♀ ( TYCN) GoogleMaps (00380665).
Rediagnosis. Recognized by its typical, antlike body shape of the genus ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A–B); dark reddish brown general coloration; somewhat clavate segment II with apical part about 1.5 times as thick as base; slightly curved metatibia; C-shaped, rather broad endosoma with shortened, small median process ( Figs 11B View FIGURE 11 , 14 View FIGURE 14 J–K); thick-rimmed, ovoid sclerotized ring with a developed rim dorsally; and vestibular sclerite with a short, thumb-like projection leftlaterally ( Fig. 12A View FIGURE 12 ).
Measurements. See Table 2.
Biology. This univoltine mirid is known to inhabit a variety of deciduous broadleaf trees, such as Betulaceae , Salicaceae and Ulmaceae hosts, in temperate and cold temperate climate zones ( Kerzhner, 1988). However, Urayama et al. (2019) and Yamamoto & Yasunaga (2020) recently suggested that P. erraticus is obviously expanding its distribution range from forest to urbanized zones, utilizing (usually deciduous) trees planted for gardening or landscaping. The latest investigation also recognized a subtropical broadleaf, Ficus superba , as an additional breeding host, that was planted at the front garden of NWHS (cf. Fukuda et al., 2020).
Discussion. This species and P. pseudoperplexus have been frequently confused with each other, due to the great similarity in coloration, size, dorsal vestiture pattern and emergence period of adult (cf. Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A–D). However, both species are usually distinguished from each other by external characters alone (couplet 18 of the above key). The shape of endosomal median process ( Fig. 11B View FIGURE 11 vs. 11C) and female genital chamber ( Fig. 12A View FIGURE 12 vs. 12C) is also distinct in each species. The egg of P. erraticus ( Fig. 12B View FIGURE 12 ) was also found to be evidently longer than that of P. pseudoperplexus ( Fig. 12E View FIGURE 12 ).
Confirmed breeding hosts of P. erraticus range over various broadleaf trees of more than five plant families as mentioned in above checklist, whereas P. pseudoperplex appears host plant specific with its occurrence currently restricted to deciduous Quercus oaks.
Aukema, B. (2018) Catalogue of the Palaearctic Heteroptera (searchable database). Available from: https: // catpalhet. linnaeus. naturalis. nl / (accessed 5 December 2020)
Fukuda, K., Kataoka, K., Ozaki, M., Sasano, H., Yasunaga, T. & Asanabe, H. (2020) A preliminary assessment of the nymphal characters for ant-mimetic plant bugs of the genus Pilophorus (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Phylinae). Heteropterus Revista de Entomologia, 20 (2). [in press]
Kerzhner, I. M. (1988) Infraorder Cimicomorpha. 21. Family Miridae (Capsidae). In: Ler, P. A. (Ed.), Opredelitel' nasekomykh Dal'nego Vostoka SSSR [Keys to the identification of insects of the Soviet Far East]. Vol. 2. Homoptera and Heteroptera. Nauka, Leningrad, pp. 778 - 857. [in Russian]
Schuh, R. T. (2002 - 2013) On-line Systematic Catalog of Plant Bugs (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae). Available from: http: // research. amnh. org / pbi / catalog / (accessed 5 December 2020)
Yamamoto, A. & Yasunaga, T. (2020) New distributional records of a microphysid and 10 mirid species from Hokkaido, Japan. Rostria, 65, 75 - 83. [in Japanese with English summary]
Yasunaga, T., Takai, M., Yamashita, I., Kawamura, M. & Kawasawa, T. (1993) A Field Guide to Japanese Bugs. Terrestrial Heteropterans. Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai, Tokyo, 380 pp. [in Japanese]
FIGURE 2. Habitus images of Pilophorus spp., live individuals. A. P. erraticus ♂. B. P. erraticus ♀. C–D. P. pseudoperplexus ♂. E. P. nakatanii, holotype ♂. F. P. lucidus ♀.
FIGURE 11. Male endosoma (vesica) and endosoma of Japanese Pilophorus spp. A. P. choii (from Otaru). B. P. erraticus (Nagasaki). C. P. pseudoperplexus (Kanagawa). D. P.okamotoi (Tsushima Is.). E. P.satoyamanus n. sp. (Kochi).F. P.setulosellus n. sp. (Hiroshima). G. Same (Nara). H. P. setulosus (Sapporo, type locality, Salix). I. Same, (Shiretoko, Artemisia).
FIGURE 12. Female bursa copulatrix and eggs (B, E, H) of Japanese Pilophorus spp. A, C, F, K–L. Dorsal view. D, G, I, J, M. Ventral view, with vestibular sclerite (VES). A–B. P. erraticus (Nagasaki). C–E. P. pseudoperplexus (Otaru). F–H. P. satoyamanus n. sp. (Ibaraki). I. P. okamotoi (Tsushima Is.). J–K. P. setulosellus n. sp. (Hiroshima). L–M. P. setulosus (Asahikawa).
FIGURE 14. Scanning electron micrographs for Japanese Pilophorus spp., males (except for E, L, P: ♀). A–D. P. choii. E–K. P. erraticus. L–N. P. pseudoperplexus. O–Q. P. miyamotoi. A, E. Left-dorsolateral habitus. B, I, N. Apex of pygophore, left lateral view. C–D, J–K, Q. Endosoma (vesica).A, E. Dorsal habitus. F. Thoracic pleura, left lateral view. H, L, M, O, P. Lateral habitus. G. Pygophore, dorsal view.
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pilophorus erraticus Linnavuori, 1962
Yasunaga, Tomohide, Duwal, Ram Keshari & Nakatani, Yukinobu 2021 |
Pilophorus erraticus
Linnavuori 1962: 170 |
Pilophorus miyamotoi
Linnavuori 1961 |
1 (by plazi, 2021-03-11 07:21:01)
2 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-03-11 07:31:08)
3 (by diego, 2021-03-18 17:02:58)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-03-18 17:13:43)
5 (by felipe, 2021-06-04 20:27:46)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-09-19 03:23:16)
7 (by plazi, 2023-11-01 23:58:05)