Siamspinops formosensis (Kayashima, 1943) Yu & Lo & Huang & Hsiao & Ding, 2019

Yu, Kuang-Ping, Lo, Ying-Yuan, Huang, Wen-Chun, Hsiao, Yun & Ding, Tzung-Su, 2019, Redescription of a wall crab spider species from Taiwan: Siamspinops formosensis (Kayashima, 1943) comb. nov., with the first description of males and taxonomic notes (Araneae: Selenopidae), Zootaxa 4543 (4), pp. 590-594 : 591-593

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4543.4.8

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:61905546-EBBB-430F-816D-7D8972486D0E

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3510466

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A1081C01-A551-FF9E-C896-FE7CFC576129

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Siamspinops formosensis (Kayashima, 1943)
status

comb. nov.

Siamspinops formosensis (Kayashima, 1943) View in CoL comb. nov. ( Figs 1–19 View FIGURES 1–10 View FIGURES 11–19 )

Selenops formosensis Kayashima, 1943a: 65 .

Selenopus formosanus Kayashima. Kayashima 1943b: 11 , pl. 17, fig. 2 [sic] (incorrect subsequent spelling)

Selenops formosansis Kayashima. Kayashima, 1943b: 34 , pl. 17, fig. 2 [sic] (incorrect subsequent spelling)

Pakawops formosanus (Kayashima) . Crews and Harvey 2011: 96 View Cited Treatment , fig. 115 [sic] (incorrect subsequent spelling)

Material examined: TAIWAN: Taipei City: GoogleMaps male, Taiwan, Taipei, Shilin   GoogleMaps , Zhishanyan Park   GoogleMaps (25°6'12.44"N, 121°31'48.59"E), 17 October 2016, Han-Po Chang (HPC) leg. (TESRI-Ar2300); female, Fuzhoushan Park, 8 December 2009, Shyh-Hwang Chen (SHC) leg. (NTNUB-Ar45977); female, Fuzhoushan Park, 8 December 2009, SHC leg. (NTNUB-Ar45977); male, Fuyang Eco Park (25°0'57.25"N, 121°33'26.13"E), 4 November 2015, Kuang-Ping Yu (KPY) leg. (TESRI-Ar1903); female, Fuyang Eco Park (25°0'57.58"N, 121°33'25.47"E), 4 March 2016, KPY leg. (TESRI- Ar1902); female, Zhishanyan Park (25°6'12.05"N, 121°31'49.4"E), 25 January 2017, HPC leg. (TESRI-Ar2741); male, Tianliao (25°5'49.97"N, 121°35'27.48"E), 15 October 2016, HPC leg. (TESRI-Ar2301); male, Zhishanyan Park (25°6'11.94"N, 121°31'50.14"E), 25 January 2017, HPC leg. (TESRI-Ar2740). Taichung City: two females, Chung Cheng Camp Zone (24°10'24.15"N, 120°47'24.15"E), 20 February 2018, KPY leg. (TESRI-Ar 2742–43) GoogleMaps . Chiayi City: female, Lantan trail (23°28'45.72"N, 120°29'22.84"E), 17 March 2018, Ying-Yuan Lo (YYL) leg. (TESRI-Ar2744) GoogleMaps . Pingtung County: male, Shuangliu Forest Recreation Area (22°13'3.53"N, 120°47'42.42"E), 22 April 2018, Yu-Ta Lai leg. (TESRI-Ar2781) GoogleMaps . Hualien County: female Hutou Mt, 22 January 2011, Wen-Chun Huang (WCH) leg. (NTNUB- Ar20981); female, Hutou Mt., 19 February 2011, WCH leg. (NTNUB-Ar63058); female, Loshan village , 17 December 2010, WCH leg. (NTNUB-Ar60949); female, Loshan village , 1 April 2011, WCH leg. (NTNUB-Ar63638) . Taitung County: female, Tianlong Trail (23°10'27.68"N, 121°2'33.08"E), 16 November 2014, WCH leg. (TESRI-Ar1901); female, Tianlong trail, 27 November 2010, WCH leg. (NTNUB-Ar60825); 2 females, Tianlong Trail, 8 March 2011, WCH leg. (NTNUB-Ar44964; NTNUB-Ar44965) GoogleMaps .

Diagnosis. Females of Siamspinops formosensis are most similar to S. aculeatus ( Simon, 1901) in the appearance of the epigyne, but can be distinguished from the latter by the less coiled copulatory ducts (9–12 turns whereas there are 15 turns in S. aculeatus ); the posterodorsal fold of vulva are slightly more complex than in the latter ( Figs 4–5 View FIGURES 1–10 , 12–13 View FIGURES 11–19 ). Males of S. formosensis differ from all other Siamspinops species in the shorter palpal tibia, blunter median apophysis, longer and thinner conductor, straighter and blunter tibial apophysis ( Figs 9–10 View FIGURES 1–10 , 15 View FIGURES 11–19 ).

Redescription. Female ( Taiwan, Taipei; TESRI-Ar2471): Total length 5.1; cephalothorax length 2.2, width 2.5; abdomen length 2.9, width 2.3. Length of palps and legs: palp 2.5 (0.8, 0.4, 0.5, 0.8); leg I 8.8 (2.8, 0.7, 2.7, 1.9, 0.8); leg II 10.5 (3.6, 1.0, 3.0, 2.2, 0.7); leg III 10.4 (3.8, 1.0, 2.7, 1.9, 0.9); leg IV 9.4 (3.5, 0.8, 2.6, 1.7, 0.8). Leg formula 2341. Dorsal shield of prosoma brown, nearly round, dorsoventrally flattened, and covered by yellowish-brown short setae, with blackish-brown cloud-shaped markings on post caput, thoracic groove and radial furrow area. Eight eyes ringed with black. Eyes arranged in two rows, AER straight to weakly recurved, PER strongly recurved. MOA brown and covered by yellowish-brown setae. Diameters of AME 0.15, ALE 0.20, PME 0.07, PLE 0.28; MOA length 0.09, anterior width of MOA 0.47, posterior width of MOA 1.00; interval of AMEs 0.16, interval of PMEs 1.22, interval of ALEs 0.07, interval of PLEs 0.11. Clypeus 0.09. Clypeus dark brown with strong setae at the margin. Chelicera chestnut brown with 3 promarginal teeth and 2 retromarginal teeth ( Fig 3 View FIGURES 1–10 ). Endites and labium chestnut brown. Labium about twice as long as wide. Sternum brown, nearly round and posteriorly indented. Legs and palps light brown with dark blackish-green markings irregularly spaced on each leg segment. All legs with 3 long spines dorsally on femur, and femur I with 2 additional spines prolaterally. Tibia and metatarsus of legs I and II with strong, paired spines ventrally. Spination: Leg I tibia ventral 2.2.2.2.2.1; metatarsus ventral 2.2.2.2.2 ( Fig 2 View FIGURES 1–10 ). Opisthosoma long oval. Dorsum brown, covered by yellowish-brown short setae and with irregular dark brown markings centrally and laterally but a triangle shaped area without any marking on the 1/4 from the end ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–10 , 11 View FIGURES 11–19 ). Venter brown, covered by thin brown setae, with blackish-brown margin extending to spinnerets. Epigyne dark brown, weakly sclerotized and incompletely divided into two lobes. Copulatory openings located centrally, arch-shaped. Spermathecae small and difficult to distinguish from copulatory ducts, which are kidney-shaped with 9 coils, and slightly thickened in the beginning. Posterodorsal epigynal fold divided medially ( Figs 4–5 View FIGURES 1–10 , 12–13 View FIGURES 11–19 ).

Male ( Taiwan, Taipei; TESRI-Ar2300): Total length 5.5; cephalothorax length 2.7, width 3.0; abdomen length 2.8, width 2.1. Length of palps and legs: palp 2.7 (0.8, 0.3, 0.7, 0.9); leg I 13.2 (4.1, 1.4, 3.6, 2.8, 1.3); leg II 17.8 (5.7, 1.6, 5.1, 3.9, 1.5); leg III 16.4 (5.6, 1.3, 4.7, 3.5, 1.3); leg IV 13.5 (4.7, 1.1, 3.6, 2.9, 1.2). Leg formula 2314. Diameters of AME 0.18, ALE 0.22, PME 0.11, PLE 0.27; MOA length 0.20, anterior width of MOA 0.49, posterior width of MOA 1.29, interval of AMEs 0.13; interval of PMEs 1.07, interval of ALEs 0.04, interval of PLEs 0.13. Clypeus 0.07. All legs also with 3 long spines dorsally on femur, and femur I with 2 additional spines prolaterally. Spination: Leg I tibia ventral 2.2.2.2.2.2.2.1; metatarsus ventral 2.2.2.2.1 ( Fig 7 View FIGURES 1–10 ). Male is similar to female, but the prosoma is wider and darker than in female ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 1–10 , 14 View FIGURES 11–19 ). Length of chelicera is about 1/2 length of the cephalothorax and significantly longer than in female. Chelicera with 3 promarginal teeth and 2 retromarginal teeth ( Fig 8 View FIGURES 1–10 ). Palpal cymbium nearly round, with T-shaped conductor. Tibia with two sclerotized retrolateral apophyses. The ventral retrolateral apophysis spoon-shaped; the dorsal retrolateral apophysis is two times the size of the ventral branch, with weak bend at 1/5 distance from the tip ( Figs 9–10 View FIGURES 1–10 , 15 View FIGURES 11–19 ).

Variation. The following variation was observed in females (male variation in parentheses). Total length 6.8 ± 0.7 (6.2 ± 0.6): cephalothorax length 2.5 ± 0.2 (2.9 ± 0.3), width 3.0 ± 0.3 (3.4 ± 0.4); abdomen length 4.3 ± 0.6 (3.3 ± 0.4), width 3.1 ± 0.7 (2.6 ± 0.4). palp 2.3 ± 0.3 (2.6 ± 0.4); leg I 8.2 ± 0.8 (12.7 ± 1.4); leg II 9.5 ± 1.0 (16.9 ± 2.2); leg III 9. 7 ± 1.12 (15.3 ± 1.8); leg IV 8.4 ± 0.9 (12.6 ± 1.4). The differences may change the leg formulae: 3241, 3214, 2314 (2341) were all observed. Diameters of AME 0.15 ± 0.03 (0.20 ± 0.02), ALE 0.19 ± 0.04 (0.25 ± 0.04), PME 0.05 ± 0.01 (0.09 ± 0.04), PLE 0.24 ± 0.04 (0.31 ± 0.06); clypeus 0.07 ± 0.03 (0.06 ± 0.01). Specimens have 11–14 (14–16) tibial and 10 (9–10) metatarsal ventral spines on leg I and II, respectively.

Remarks. Kayashima (1943b) and Crews and Harvey (2011) used different subsequent spellings but these do not fulfill the criteria for a mandatory change or an emendation. Thus, these different subsequent spellings are not available names and cannot enter into homonymy or be used as substitute names ( ICZN 1999, Article 33.3).

The characters of the specimens collected from various areas of Taiwan are consistent with the original description by Kayashima (1943a), and they can be undoubtedly identified as S. formosensis .

Distribution. Taiwan (low altitude primary and secondary forests).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Selenopidae

Genus

Siamspinops

Loc

Siamspinops formosensis (Kayashima, 1943)

Yu, Kuang-Ping, Lo, Ying-Yuan, Huang, Wen-Chun, Hsiao, Yun & Ding, Tzung-Su 2019
2019
Loc

Pakawops formosanus

Crews, S. C. & Harvey, M. S. 2011: 96
2011
Loc

Selenops formosensis

Kayashima, I. 1943: 65
1943
Loc

formosanus

Kayashima, I. 1943: 11
1943
Loc

Selenops formosansis

Kayashima, I. 1943: 34
1943
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF