Aleurilobini

Manzari, Shahab & Quicke, Donald L. J., 2006, A cladistic analysis of whiteflies, subfamily Aleyrodinae (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae), Journal of Natural History 40 (44 - 46), pp. 2423-2554 : 2452

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222930601121890

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A06D87E9-7965-FFD6-FDA2-FCE8FC0EED9F

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Aleurilobini
status

 

Tribe Aleurilobini

This tribe was proposed by Takahashi (1954), for five genera based on Japanese species ( Acanthobemisia , Aleurolobus , Apobemisia , Bemisia , Parabemisia ). All studied species of Aleurolobus including the type-species, A. marlatti (Quaintance) , were recovered in the same clade but not as a monophyletic group. The only examined species of Apobemisa, A. kuwanai (Takahashi) (the type-species), was not found with Aleurolobus in the same clade, and the type-species of Bemisia (not recovered as a monophyletic genus), B. tabaci , was never recovered either with Aleurolobus or Apobemisia . The type-species of Parabemisia was not studied but the five examined species did not form a clade. Acanthobemisia and the four species of Parabemisia were only recovered in the same clade in the strict consensus tree of MPTs-SAW-MaxRI ( Figure 14 View Figure 14 ). David (1990) later transferred Bemisia to a separate tribe, Bemisini (see below), but Takahashi’s Aleurolobini , even excluding Bemisia , was not supported in this study.

David (1990) and Regu and David (1993) classified six genera from India in this tribe (Appendix A). Only the type-species of Aleuropapillatus and Orientaleyrodes were studied and these appeared in two distantly separated clades. Africaleurodes was found as a monophyletic genus, but did not form a clade with the other five genera. Two examined species of Asterochiton (but not the type-species) were recovered on two different branches. All species of Aleurolobus and Crescentaleyrodes were found in the same clade ( Figures 13 View Figure 13 , 14 View Figure 14 and 19 View Figure 19 ), and the possible monophyly of the latter will be discussed later.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF