Bemisini
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222930601121890 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A06D87E9-795A-FFE9-FD82-FB0BFE9BED9F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Bemisini |
status |
|
Tribe Bemisini
Four of the six genera placed in this tribe by David (1990) (Appendix A) were briefly discussed above. The type-species of Pealius was not studied but the 10 examined species did not form a monophyletic clade. Setaleyrodes including the type-species, S. mirabilis Takahashi , also appeared non-monophyletic, but they were recovered together with some species of Pealius in the same clade ( Figures 13 View Figure 13 and 14 View Figure 14 ). Indoaleyrodes (three species examined including the type-species, I. laos (Takahashi)) was recovered as monophyletic but in a separate clade. The type-species of Neopealius (the only examined species of this small genus) was on its own branch. As already mentioned, the monophyly of Bemisia was refuted statistically (Table II) (see also ‘‘Discussion’’) and its type-species, B. tabaci , was on its own branch.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.