Phytoseius amba Pritchard & Baker, 1962
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24349/acarologia/20184256 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BABDD080-D2D0-46F6-8172-442298192D42 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4522461 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9F2A836C-FFA2-CC21-FE08-FE1DB7E7FA89 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Phytoseius amba Pritchard & Baker |
status |
|
Phytoseius amba Pritchard & Baker View in CoL
Phytoseius (Pennaseius) amba Pritchard & Baker 1962: 224 View in CoL ; Blommers, 1976: 85;
Phytoseius (Phytoseius) amba View in CoL , Denmark, 1966: 49;
Typhlodromus (Pizytoseius) amba, Van der Merwe, 1968: 101 ;
Phytoseius amba, Swirski & Ragusa, 1978: 408 View in CoL ;
Pennaseius amba, Matthysse & Denmark, 1981: 352 ;
Phytoseius amba, Moraes et al., 1986: 210 View in CoL ; 2004: 232; Chant & McMurtry, 2007: 129.
Species of the genus Phytoseius are supposed to belong to the Type III species ( McMurtry and Croft 1997; McMurtry et al. 2013), i.e. a polyphagous generalist predator. However, the biology of Phytoseius amba remains totally unknown.
Specimens examined — Mdé, INRAPE (long. 11°41′S, lat. 43°14′E, alt. 50 m), 1 ♀ on Annona muricata L. ( Annonaceae ), 2-02-2017.
Previous Records — Benin, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, DR Congo, Kenya, Madagascar Island, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, Reunion Island, Rwanda, Senegal, South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe.
Remarks ( Table 6) — The setae lengths seem very variable in this species following data of the literature. Measurements of the single adult female ( Table 6) agree well with measurements of the literature, especially with those of Ueckermann et al. (2007) obtained with a great number of specimens (29) from various countries in Africa, with the exception of longer j3 and z3, shorter st5-st5, ventrianal shield length and width at the level of anus and macrosetae of the basitarsus and telotarsus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Phytoseius amba Pritchard & Baker
Kreiter, Serge, Payet, Rose-My, Fillâtre, Jacques & Azali, Hamza Abdou 2018 |
Phytoseius amba
Chant D. A. & McMurtry J. A. 2007: 129 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. 1986: 210 |
Pennaseius amba
Matthysse J. G. & Denmark H. A. 1981: 352 |
Phytoseius amba
Swirski E. & Ragusa S. 1978: 408 |
Typhlodromus (Pizytoseius) amba
Van der Merwe G. G. 1968: 101 |
Phytoseius (Phytoseius) amba
Denmark H. A. 1966: 49 |
Phytoseius (Pennaseius) amba
Blommers L. 1976: 85 |
Pritchard A. E. & Baker E. W. 1962: 224 |