Glandulocauda Eigenmann, 1911
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/S1679-62252009000300002 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9A761405-D01E-DF6F-FEB3-A9CBFBB6FD41 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Glandulocauda Eigenmann, 1911 |
status |
|
Glandulocauda Eigenmann, 1911 View in CoL
Glandulocauda Eigenmann, 1911b: 168 View in CoL [type species: Glandulocauda melanogenys Eigenmann (1911b: 168) View in CoL by original designation. - Eigenmann, 1914: 35 and 42 (in key to genera of Glandulocaudinae ). - Eigenmann & Myers, 1929: 467, 487-490 (followed Eigenmann,1911b, in allocation of species). - Travassos, 1951b: 66 (listed). - Böhlke, 1958: 43 (followed Eigenmann, 1911a, in allocation of species). - Nelson, 1964a: 63-75 (accepted Glandulocauda View in CoL based on anatomy of G. inequalis View in CoL rather than G. melanopleura View in CoL ). - Géry, 1964: 6-9 (placed G. inequalis View in CoL in Mimagoniates View in CoL and accepted his new species G. terofali View in CoL as a species of Glandulocauda View in CoL ; tentatively based concept of Glandulocauda View in CoL on anatomy of G. terofali View in CoL ). - Géry, 1966: 228-299, 235 ( G. inequalis View in CoL separate from Glandulocauda View in CoL , but did not assign it generic name; retained G. terofali View in CoL in Glandulocauda View in CoL ). - Géry, 1977: 355-362 (included equivalents of G. melanopleura View in CoL , G. caerulea View in CoL , and G. terofali View in CoL ; considered G. inequalis View in CoL to have uncertain status). - Weitzman & Fink, 1985: 2, 103-109, 109 (assigned only equivalents of G. melanopleura View in CoL and G. caerulea View in CoL to Glandulocauda View in CoL ; removed G. terofali View in CoL to Diapoma Cope View in CoL and G. inequalis View in CoL to Mimagoniates View in CoL ). - Weitzman et al., 1988: 384-413 (followed Weitzman & Fink, 1985, in assignment of species to genera). - Menezes & Weitzman, 1990: 384 (followed Weitzman & Fink, 1985: 2, 103-106, 109; in key to genera and species of Glandulocaudini ).
Diagnosis. Glandulocauda can be distinguished from the remaining glandulocaudines by having principal caudal-fin rays 11 and 12 slightly bowed ventrally but not involved in the formation of a fin-ray pump. Glandulocauda additionally differs from Lophiobrycon by having the origin of the dorsal fin just slightly ahead of vertical through anal-fin origin ( Figs. 11 View Fig and 12 View Fig ), but closer to caudal-fin basin than to snout tip, 16- 19 scale rows around the caudal peduncle and the lack of a urogenital papilla in females. In Lophiobrycon the dorsal fin origin is considerably ahead of vertical through anal-fin origin ( Fig. 3 View Fig ) and closer to snout tip than to caudal-fin base ( Fig. 3 View Fig ), the number of scale rows around the caudal peduncle is 14- 15, and the urogenital papilla is present in females ( Fig. 8 View Fig ). From Mimagoniates it differs by having the origin of the dorsal fin slightly ahead of vertical through anal-fin origin ( Figs. 11- 12 View Fig View Fig and 20-21 View Fig View Fig ), adult males with more than one hook on anal-fin rays that bear hooks ( Figs. 16 View Fig and 26 View Fig ), and fewer predorsal scales (15-18). In Mimagoniates the origin of the dorsal-fin is posterior to vertical through anal-fin origin ( Figs. 30-31 View Fig View Fig , 36 View Fig , 45-46 View Fig View Fig , 52-53 View Fig View Fig , 63-64 View Fig View Fig , 70-71 View Fig View Fig , and 77-79), the adult males usually have no more than 1 hook on anal-fin rays that bear hooks, sometimes 2 hooks on anterior divided ray and 3 on longest unbranched anterior ray ( Figs. 33 View Fig , 39 View Fig , 50 View Fig , 56 View Fig , 65 View Fig , 73 View Fig and 81 View Fig ) and more predorsal scales (18-28).
Remarks. Live colors of Lophiobrycon weitzmani (see Castro et al. 2003, fig. 2) briefly described by these authors (p.15) differ considerably from those of both species of Glandulocauda and must be autapomorphic for that genus. Adult males of G. melanopleura are predominantly pale yellow admixed with some brownish green; see Weitzman & Menezes (1994: 4) for color photographs in life. The live body color for G. caerulea is a dark steely blue with apparently some purple added; see Weitzman & Menezes (1994: 4). This color may not be exactly accurate because we believe the color temperature of the color film used in Weitzman & Menezes (1994: 4) was not exactly balanced for the light source used. The blue body color found in Glandulocauda caerulea differs from that found in the species of Mimagoniates and is not found in other characids known to us. We suggest that the blue color in G. caerulea is derived and possibly autapomorphic for the species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Glandulocauda Eigenmann, 1911
Menezes ¹, Naércio A. & Weitzman ², Stanley H. 2009 |
Glandulocauda
Gery, J. 1977: 355 |
Gery, J. 1966: 228 |
Nelson, K. 1964: 63 |
Gery, J. 1964: 6 |
Bohlke, J. E. 1958: 43 |
Travassos, H. 1951: 66 |
Eigenmann, C. H. 1914: 35 |
Eigenmann, C. H. 1911: 168 |
Eigenmann, C. H. 1911: ) |