Serica (s. l.) camura Ahrens, Zhao, Pham & Liu, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5491.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0612E62C-A53D-42BE-8578-68EC77D34627 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13212391 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9A5F87E8-FFC1-7C70-FF4D-AFADEED0FC5A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Serica (s. l.) camura Ahrens, Zhao, Pham & Liu |
status |
sp. nov. |
Serica (s. l.) camura Ahrens, Zhao, Pham & Liu , new species
Fig. 11A–E View FIGURE 11
Type material examined. Holotype ♂ [ China] “ Mts. Hupingshan, Shimen , Hunan, 17–20.VIII.2004, leg. Wang Jiliang, Wang Jianfeng / LW-254 / Asia Sericini 1320 spec.” ( HBUM) . Paratype: 1 ♂ “LW-1366 / LW-1366 China: Guizhou, Kuankuoshui Nature Reserve, Baishao , 2010-VI- 9, 746m” ( ZFMK) .
Description of holotype. Length: 8.8 mm, length of elytra: 7.0 mm, width: 5.5 mm. Body oval and strongly convex, dark brown, head, pronotum and some spots on elytra with greenish shine, elytra with darker spots, antenna yellow, dorsal surface weakly shiny or iridescent, with dense, short, adpressed white setae.
Labroclypeus slightly wider than long, widest at base, lateral margins in basal half straight and subparallel, anteriorly strongly convex and convergent, anterior angles strongly convex, anterior margin deeply emarginate medially; margins weakly reflexed; surface flat, shiny, basally narrowly dull, finely and densely punctate, with a dense and long, erect setae and a few white fine scales at base; frontoclypeal suture distinct, slightly elevated, and weakly curved; smooth area anterior to eye as wide as long; ocular canthus long and narrow (1/4 of ocular diameter), with a few fine punctures, minute setae, and a short terminal seta. Frons flat; surface with fine and dense punctures and with white, short, adpressed scales, additionally with numerous long erect setae. Eyes small, ratio diameter/interocular width: 0.6. Antenna with ten antennomeres; club with three antennomeres, 1.1 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined and straight. Mentum elevated and anteriorly flattened. Labrum elliptical, well produced and distinctly emarginate medially.
Pronotum trapezoidal, little wider than long, widest at base, lateral margins straight and strongly convergent anteriorly, in anterior third weakly convex and convergent anteriorly; anterior angles weakly produced and acute, posterior angles acute; anterior margin almost straight, with fine and indistinct but medially complete anterior marginal line; surface densely and finely punctate, midline narrowly impunctate, with dense, white, short, adpressed scales; anterior and lateral margins with long sparse setae; hypomeron distinctly carinate, carina slightly produced ventrally. Scutellum slender and long, dull, triangular, finely and densely punctate, with white scales as in pronotum, base widely impunctate and glabrous.
Elytra oval, widest at middle, striae weakly impressed, finely and densely punctate, intervals weakly convex, with fine, dense punctures, dark spots completely smooth; intervals with dense, short, adpressed, white scales, each interval additionally with a few, single, longer, yellowish scales; epipleural edge fine, ending at moderately curved external apical angle of elytra, epipleura densely setose, apical border membranous, with a fine membranous rim of fine microtrichomes (magnification 100x).
Ventral surface dull, finely and densely punctate, including metacoxa densely setose, metacoxa laterally with a more robust and longer setae and along the anterior margin with a few small white scales; abdominal sternites finely and densely punctate, with a transverse row of coarse punctures, each bearing a short, robust seta, otherwise finely densely setose. Mesosternum between mesocoxae half as wide as the slender mesofemur. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.45. Pygidium moderately convex and dull, finely and densely punctate, with wide, smooth midline, with fine, dense, short, white setae, with a few small, white scales and numerous fine long setae along apical margin.
Legs moderately slender; femora with two longitudinal rows of setae, coarsely and densely punctate between rows; metafemur shiny, anterior margin acute, without a continuously serrated line behind anterior margin; ventral posterior margin serrated in apical half and not widened, dorsal posterior margin completely serrated, in basal half with a few long setae which are half as long as width of metafemur. Metatibia moderately wide and moderately long, widest at middle, ratio of width/length: 1/3.1; dorsal margin sharply carinate, with two groups of spines, basal group at middle, apical group at three quarters of metatibial length, basally with a few single, robust setae; lateral face longitudinally concave, coarsely densely punctate, punctures somewhat elongate, with minute setae; ventral margin serrated, with three robust setae of which the two distal ones are more widely separated; medial face sparsely punctate and glabrous; apex interiorly near tarsal articulation indistinctly bluntly truncate. Tarsomeres ventrally with sparse, minute setae, dorsally finely punctate; metatarsomeres of holotype lacking. Protibia short, bidentate, external margin smooth; anterior claws asymmetrical, basal tooth of inner claw short and lobiform, basal tooth of inner claw normal.
Aedeagus: Fig. 11A–C View FIGURE 11 . Habitus: Fig. 11D–E View FIGURE 11 . Female unknown.
Diagnosis. This new species is quite similar to S. tryznai , differs however, in the strongly bent left paramere and the (lateral view) narrower right paramere.
Etymology. The name of this species is derived from the Latin word camurus (curved), with reference to the strongly curved left paramere of the species (noun in nominative singular case).
Variation. Length: 8.2–8.8 mm, length of elytra: 6.8–7.0 mm, width: 5.1–5.5 mm. Metatarsomeres laterally carinate, with some wrinkles beside punctures, with a strongly serrated ridge ventrally; first metatarsomere as long as following two tarsomeres combined and twice as long as dorsal tibial spur.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |