Circoniscus ornatus (Verhoeff, 1941)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/2358-2936e |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DD66D5C5-F00A-412C-94DD-4DC72AED24FD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10912074 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/98735F75-FFF2-062E-FF3C-FD81A7880762 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Circoniscus ornatus (Verhoeff, 1941) |
status |
|
19. Circoniscus ornatus (Verhoeff, 1941) View in CoL
Fig. 3A View Figure 3
Parcirconiscus ornatus Verhoeff, 1941b View in CoL , 169, figs. 1–9.
Circoniscus gaigei View in CoL — Schmalfuss, 1980b: 4. — Leistikow and Wägele, 1999: 38. — Schmalfuss, 2003: 81.
Circoniscus ornatus — Schmidt,2007:68,figs.209–216.
Material examined. 24♀, 9♂, 39 mancas (MUSA-ENT-ISO 001), Nueva Alianza, Contamana , Loreto, 7°24ʹ49.95ʺS 74°57ʹ43.44ʺW, November 2019, leg. A. Ocampo and C. Ruelas GoogleMaps ; 65♀, 13♂,12 mancas(MUSA-ENT-ISO 002), 7°24ʹ37.81ʺS 74°57ʹ42.69ʺW, same data as previous GoogleMaps ; 6♀, 6♂, 2 mancas (MUSA-ENT-ISO 003), 7°24ʹ38.52ʺS 74°57ʹ54.92ʺW, same data as previous GoogleMaps ; 24♀, 12♂, 8 mancas (MUSA-ENT-ISO 004), 7°24ʹ52.53ʺS 74°58ʹ1.68ʺ W, same data as previous GoogleMaps ; 12♀, 8♂, 4 mancas (MUSA-ENT-ISO 005), 7°24ʹ47.90ʺS 74°57ʹ52.70ʺW, same data as previous GoogleMaps ; 14 ♀, 1♂ (MUSA-ENT-ISO 006), 7°24ʹ31.72ʺS 74°57ʹ46.08ʺW, same data as previous GoogleMaps ; 18♀, 1♂ (MUSA-ENT-ISO 007), Nuevo Sucre, Contamana , Loreto, 7°24ʹ47.21ʺS 74°56ʹ8.51ʺW, same data as previous GoogleMaps ; 91♀, 29♂, 34 mancas (MUSA-ENT-ISO 008), 7°25ʹ1.24ʺS 74°56ʹ5.76ʺW, same data as previous GoogleMaps ; 2♀, 1 manca (MUSA-ENT-ISO 009), 7°25ʹ18.21ʺS 74°56ʹ19.50ʺW, same data as previous GoogleMaps .
Distribution. Guyana, Surinam, and Brazil (Amapá, Amazonas, and Pará States) ( Schmidt, 2007; Boyko et al., 2008a; Campos-Filho et al., 2018). It is recorded in Peru from the department of Huánuco, Panguana Biological Station ( Schmalfuss, 1980b; Leistikow and Wägele, 1999; Schmalfuss, 2003; Schmidt, 2007; Boyko et al., 2008a). The present article extends the knowledge of its distribution to the department of Loreto, in the buffer zone of the Cordillera Azul National Park (Nueva Alianza) and the locality of Nuevo Sucre.
Ecological remarks. Specimens were collected from inside a marsupial’s skull ( Philander sp. ); decayed termite nests on the leaf litter, a few of them with some termites present; in cavities inside rotten logs and also under the bark of trees, all located in Nueva Alianza ( Fig. 2C–E View Figure 2 .). In Nuevo Sucre locality, C. ornatus was observed under pseudostem of decayed banana plants and inside rotten logs ( Fig. 2F View Figure 2 ). The isopods shared the microhabitats with ants, termites, roaches, millipedes, centipedes, spiders, mosquitoes, and frogs.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Circoniscus ornatus (Verhoeff, 1941)
Ocampo-Maceda, Ana Teresa, Ruelas-Cabana, Carlos Miguel, López-Orozco, Carlos Mario & López-Tejeda, Evaristo Luciano 2022 |
Circoniscus gaigei
Schmalfuss, H. 1980: 4 |