Onychiurus mai Wray, 1950
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3918.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E69AC33B-2E8A-4914-B64F-C2DF918612BE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5664765 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/985F8790-2F5C-FFFE-97BE-FCC3DB1835B1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Onychiurus mai |
status |
comb. nov. |
Leeonychiurus mai (Wray, 1950) new combination
Figs. 20 View FIGURE 20 , 21 View FIGURE 21 A–C
Onychiurus mai Wray 1950: 91 .
= O. oreadis Mills, 1935 ; Stach 1954: 56, 77.
= Pseudonychiurus oreadis ( Mills, 1935) ; Salmon 1964: 188.
?= O. flavescens Kinoshita, 1916 ; Christiansen & Bellinger 1980: 451; 1998: 494, through synonymy with O. oreadis .?= O. millsi Chamberlain, 1943 ; Christiansen & Bellinger 1980: 451; 1998: 494.
Specimens examined. Neotype male (by present designation) and two females, USA, Idaho, Franklin, 1 April 1959, poplar leaves, G. F. Knowlton, coll.
Redescription. Length 1.3–1.7 mm [up to 1.5 mm]. [Color white.] Body slightly widened at Abd. III–IV, then tapering posteriorly to rounded terminus ( Figs. 20 View FIGURE 20 A, C). Granulation simple, not segregated into distinctly different fields, granule diameter on head 2.2–2.4 Μm, on Abd. V 1.6–2.0 Μm. Anal spines conical, slightly curved dorsad, on short papillae ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 B). Dorsal chaetotaxy oligochaetotic, differentiated primarily into macro- and mesosetae. Sensillum-like setae not distinct from normal setae. Cephalic seta d0 present. Lateral microsensilla present on mesonotum and metanotum. Setae m2, p4, p6 and p7 on metanotum long ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 B). Seta m0 present on tergite V ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 C); setae a0 and p0 present on tergite VI ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 B). Mesosternum and metasternum each with 1+1 setae. Venter of Abd. VI terminus with five a-setae of similar length; setae b1 much longer than other b-setae; seta c2 at least twice the length of other c-setae ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 C).
Dorsal pseudocelli formula 32/133/33343; posterior cephalic pseudocelli visible in dorsal view ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 A); each subcoxa with one pseudocellus. Ventral pseudocelli formula 11/000/00010. Parapseudocelli and pseudopores not observed.
Antennal segment IV without apical vesicle or cauliflower-like protuberances ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 F). Most setae slender, sensillum-like. Subapical organite peg-like; microsensillum as a curved, blunt peg in pit at proximal third of Ant. IV. Sense organ of Ant. III with five guard setae, five papillae, two smooth sense rods, and two stalked, oval, morel-like (mulberry-like) sense clubs; microsensillum nearly level with papilla base ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 G). Antennal segments I, II, III with 9, 15, 14 ordinary setae, respectively. Labrum with wavy anterior edge of six lobes, the middle lobes the most distinct ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 I), labral setae not clearly observed. Maxilla ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 A) with bifurcated lamella 1 extending past capitulum teeth; lamella 2 reaching tips of teeth, denticulate on both edges; lamella 4 extending above 3, 5 and 6, its face covered with minute denticles. All sensilla of labial palpus present, sensilla A and C blunt (AC type) ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 H); guard setae a1, b1, b2 and d2 small, spines on short papillae; guard setae b4 and e3 weakly spatulate, other guard setae pointed; d1 and e4–e7 absent. Seven stout, straight proximal setae. Postantennal organ with 15 compound vesicles in wide groove ( Figs. 20 View FIGURE 20 D, E).
Tibiotarsi I and II with 3 setae in proximal whorl, 8 setae in middle whorl, and 11 setae in distal whorl; tibiotarsus III with 2 proximal, 7 middle, and 11 distal setae. Unguis untoothed, granulate basally; unguiculus granulate basally with weak basal lamella, apical filament tapering and extending past middle of ungual inner margin Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 J). Tenent hair short, pointed. Ventral tube with two basal and five distal setae on each side. Male ventral organ absent. Furcal region oval, in middle of segment, finely granulated, with four posterior setae arranged in one row ( Figs. 20 View FIGURE 20 K, L); manubrial setae arranged in three partially irregular rows.
Remarks. Specimens labeled as O. mai from the type locality were not found in the Wray collections and are presumed lost. The three specimens collected later at Franklin, Idaho, about 32 km from the type locality of Logan Canyon, Utah, labeled in Wray’s hand as O. mai and fitting the original description, were used for the redescription. The male specimen is designated as the neotype for the species.
As O. mai , this taxon has been tentatively synonymized with several other onychiurids, but differs from them in current generic placement. Wandaphorura millsi ( Chamberlain, 1943) has a PSO formula of 21/022/22233 ( Pomorski 2007). The PSO formula for O. oreadis Mills, 1935 , currently recognized as a junior synonym of Allonychiurus flavescens ( Kinoshita, 1916) ( Christiansen & Bellinger 1998) , was given as 32/122/33333 ( Mills, 1935). Allonychiurus flavescens has the same PSO formula as L. mai n. comb. ( Sun et al. 2009, 2011) but differs in generic characters.
These specimens fit well within the recently described genus Leeonychiurus Sun & Arbea, 2014 ( Sun & Arbea 2014), and therefore the species is transferred to that genus as L. mai (Wray, 1950) new combination. The dorsal PSO formula of L. mai is identical to that of L. fusongensis Sun & Arbea, 2014 , but ventrally L. mai has a single pair of pseudocelli only on Abd. IV, whereas L. fusongensis has ventral pseudocelli on Abd. II‒IV. The ratio of anal spine/claw is about 0.4 in L. mai but about 1 in L. fusongensis .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Onychiurus mai
Bernard, Ernest C. 2015 |
Pseudonychiurus oreadis (
Salmon 1964: 188 |
O. oreadis
Stach 1954: 56 |