Melanesiandra striatifrons ( Fairmaire, 1879 ), 2010

Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel & Matsuda, Kiyoshi, 2010, Revision of Hawaiian, Australasian, Oriental, and Japanese Parandrinae (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae), Insecta Mundi 2010 (130), pp. 1-120 : 43-45

Melanesiandra striatifrons ( Fairmaire, 1879)

( Fig. 22, 23 , 82 , 134, 135 , 203 , 214 , 222 , 265 , 314 , 344, 376-378)

Parandra striatifrons Fairmaire, 1879: 289 ; 1881: 468; Schmeltz 1881: 10; Lameere 1902: 84; Dillon and Dillon 1952: 3; Webb 1994: 327 (note); Evenhuis and Ramsdale 2006: 11 (checklist).

Parandra (Parandra) striatifrons ; Lameere 1913: 6 (cat.); 1919: 17; Santos-Silva 2002: 32 (note).

Parandra vitiensis Nonfried, 1894: 46 ; Lameere 1902: 84 (syn.); Dillon and Dillon 1952: 3 (revalidation); Evenhuis and Ramsdale 2006: 11 (checklist).

Birandra (Birandra) striatifrons ; Santos-Silva and Shute 2009: 32.

Description. Integument shining, chestnut; parts of head, of mandibles, margins of pronotum, anterior margin of submentum, and margins of coxal cavities blackish; legs pale-brown.

Male ( Fig. 376 ). Head wide, proportionally very large in relation to body size; dorsal surface of gibbosities, with fine punctures, moderately abundant, not confluent; area between gibbosities and occiput with similar punctures, but sparser; area close to eyes (near apex of ocular carina) and area behind eyes with large distinct punctures, abundant, in part confluent; area between gibbosities and ocular carina smooth and depressed. Central region of clypeus strongly oblique. Central projection of labrum ( Fig. 22 ), wide, truncate and with concavity at apex. Eyes ( Fig. 82 ) barely emarginated. Mandibles of major males ( Fig. 134 ) falciform, and sub-falciform in minor males, longer than head; inner margin in major males with two teeth, not together protracted, located before and after middle, apical tooth larger (in minor males, located approximately at middle of mandibles, and together protracted). Submentum depressed at area close to mentum, with large, deep, and moderately abundant punctures, in part confluent; margin close to mentum moderately elevated; pilosity sparse, restricted to sides. Antennae notably short (not reaching pronotal base); ventral sensorial area of antennae visible from side ( Fig. 222 ), divided by carina ( Fig. 314 ), elevated, visible from side; dorsal sensorial area of antennomere XI large. Maxillary palp as in Fig. 203 .

Pronotal disc strongly flat, curved laterally; anterior margin sinuous; anterior angles projected forward; lateral angle absent (sometimes indicated); posterior angle distinct; abundantly, coarsely punctate on latero-apical half; latero-basal half with fine punctures, abundant; center of disc very finely, sparsely punctate. Elytra finely, moderately abundantly punctate, sparser in circum-scutellar area; each elytron with two carinae barely marked. Metasternum with some coarse, shallow punctures at sides. Metafemur ( Fig. 377 ) elongated. Metatarsus (without claws) ( Fig. 265 ) shorter than metatibia (length equal to 0.85 times); metatarsomere V longer than I-III together.

Female ( Fig. 378 ). Central area of dorsal face of head with very fine, sparse punctation; area close to ocular carina and area behind eyes finely, moderately abundantly punctate. Central projection of labrum ( Fig. 23 ) narrow, truncate or rounded. Mandibles as in Fig. 135 . Lateral sides of pronotum finely and abundantly punctate.

Variability. Integument dark-brown; submentum completely blackish; legs brown. Males: head not notably large in relation to body (minor males); dorsal face of head, on gibbosities, with punctures somewhat coarse, similar to those at the area behind eyes (mainly laterally); area behind eyes with punctures large and sparse; apex of labrum, frequently, strongly concave frontally, apex of labrum on plane significantly lower than the rest of the labrum, labrum convex near the central projection enhancing the appearance of the latter causing it to be more prominent; pilosity of submentum present throughout or completely absent; center of pronotal disc smooth; anterior margin of submentum, close to mentum, elevated only at sides; elytral punctures uniform. Metatarsus (without claws) approximately as long as metatibiae. Female: apex of labrum narrow and rounded; dorsal sensorial area of antennomere XI fused with ventral sensorial area.

Dimensions in mm (M / F). Total length (including mandibles), 15.8-21.7/17.2-21.2; prothorax: length, 3.1-4.5/3.6-4.2; anterior width, 4.1-5.8/4.4-5.4; posterior width, 3.3-4.3/4.1-4.9; humeral width, 4.0-5.6/ 4.9-6.0; elytral length, 8.8-12.1/10.3-13.3.

Geographical distribution (Fig. 344). Fiji ( Viti Levu; Vanau Levu, Ovalau).

Material examined. (7 M, 11 F), as follows: FIJI. Ex Nonfried Collection , 2 F, [no date indicated] ( IRSN) ; Viti Levu : M, F, [no date indicated] ( AUMU) ; F, [no date indicated] ( IRSN); F, ex. Nonfried Collection (type of Parandra vitiensis ) [no date indicated] ( IRSN) ; Nandarivatu Forest , M, X.17.1985, G. F. Bornemissza coll. ( DHCO) ; M, F, X.17.1985, Bornemissza coll. ( ZSMC); 2 F, 17.X.1985, [name of collector illegible] ( ZKCO) ; M [identified by Dillon and Dillon (1952) as P. vitiensis ], IX.9.1938, Y. Kondo coll. ( BPBM); Naraiyawa (178 o 5’E, 17 o 56’S), 2 M, F, XI.20-23.1986, R. L. Brown coll. ( MEMU; 1 M MZSP) ; Nausori (Colo-i-Suva Forestry Station; 200 m), M, I.28.1994, K. Ito coll. ( KMCT) ; Belt Road (45 miles W Suva), F [identified by Dillon and Dillon (1952) as P. striatifrons ], 25.VII.1938, E. C. Zimmerman coll. ( BPBM). Vanau Levu: Kilaka (Bua; FJ-58D; 178 o 59’017”E, 16 o 48’412”S; 154m; Malaise), F, 28.VI-02.VII.2004, M. E. Irwin, E. Schlinger, M. Tokota coll. ( USNM) ; M, [no date indicated] ( USNM).

Types, type localities. Parandra striatifrons : holotype M, from Fiji ( Viti Levu), deposited at MNHN. Parandra vitiensis : holotype F, from Fiji, deposited at IRSN.

Comments. The description and redescription of Parandra striatifrons , by Fairmaire (1879, 1881), indicates that he only knew the male of this species: “mandibulis validis, capite haud brevioribus, intus obtuse, apice sat acute bidentatis, capite prothorace haud angustiore...epistomate inter mandibulas vix producto, late sinuato, utrinque angulato” [English translation: mandibles robust, longer than head, interiorly obtuse, apex distinctly bidentate, head as long as prothorax…epistoma just projected between mandibles, widely sinuous, in both sides angulated]. That hypothesis is corroborated by the comparison made by Fairmaire (1881), between P. austrocaledonica and P. striatifrons : “les mandibules ( P. austrocaledonica ) sont bien plus larges”[English translation: the mandibles ( P. austrocaledonica ) are much broader]. It is very probable that Fairmaire (1879) possessed only one male when he described the species. In Fairmaire (1879, 1881) only a single measurement was supplied: “Long.: 20 millim.” and “Long. 20 mill. (mandib. Incl.)”. But Fairmaire (1881), when writing on other species for which he had more than one specimen, indicated the variation in some measurements, for example, in the redescription of Opheltes cariosicollis Fairmaire, 1877 : “Long 26 à 40 mill”. There is no indication of the number of specimens that Fairmaire (1879) used to describe this species.

Nonfried (1894) described Parandra vitiensis , apparently, based on a single specimen (“Long. 18 mm ”). It is possible to infer that, because in the same work, in the description of Nemophas eupholoides , he supplied the measurements of at least two specimens (“Long. 22-24 mm ”). It could be possible that Nonfried (1894) had more than one specimen with the same dimensions, however, we received all specimens of Parandrinae from the Oriental province, deposited at IRSN, among which, specimens from the Nonfried Collection and, again, among which, one specimen of P. vitiensis labeled as “Type”. It is very improbable that there are types in other collections. The calligraphy in the label of the specimen of P. vitiensis that has the “Type” label, belongs to IRSN, agrees very well with that illustrated by Horn and Kahle (1937: plate XXXIV, fig. 25) of a label handwritten by Nonfried. Damoiseau and Cools (1987) did not register any type for Parandra vitiensis in the Collection of IRSN, but as mentioned above, we believe that the specimen sent for study, is the holotype of that species.

The description by Nonfried (1894) seems to adapt perfectly to a female (same sex of the specimen from IRSN labeled as “Type”), mainly by the form of the head (“Kopf schmal, vorne doppelt geschweift”). Although the description of the mandible (“Mandibeln lang”) can suggest that the specimen is a male, the mandible in that species is particularly longer than in the female, we believe that the term used by Nonfried (1894) is relative. Moreover, Nonfried (1894) stated that for the mandibles, the inner margin was toothed. This description agrees better with a female than to a male. It is possible that Nonfried (1894) described the position of teeth, if the specimen was a male.

Lameere (1902) synonymized P. vitiensis under P. striatifrons and wrote that he had studied the Fairmaire “types” and Nonfried “types” from the Museum of Hamburg and found no difference between the two. Despite Lameere (1902) stating that he studied the “types” of P. vitiensis , that species, as discussed before, was probably described from a single female (holotype).

As for P. striatifrons, Weidner (1976) did not register any “type” of that species in the Collection of Zoologisches Institut und Zoologisches Museum der Universität Hamburg. One of the authors (K. Matsuda) photographed one specimen in the MNHN that has a label of “Type”. That specimen is a male that agrees very well with the description and redescription of Fairmaire (1879, 1881). Cambefort (2006) also concluded that the types of Fairmaire were in the MNHN.

Fairmaire (1881) and Lameere (1902) recorded the work in which was published the description of Parandra striatifrons , respectively: “Naturaliste, 1879, 289” and “Naturaliste, 1879, p. 289”. Dillon and Dillon (1952) recorded another work: “Soc. ent. France, Ann. VI, 1: 486, 1881”. In fact, P. striatifrons was described in the “Petites Nouvelles Entomologiques, no 211, 1879”, that was superseded by “Le Naturaliste – Journal des échanges et des nouvelles”, whose first number was published on IV.01.1879. Fairmaire (1881) published the redescription of that species.

Dillon and Dillon (1952) revalidated P. vitiensis , and argued: “This species is easily distinguished from P. striatifrons in that it has the labrum dentate at each side angle of its anterior margin, not medially”. They also presented a key to separate the two species:

“Epistoma unidentate; head across eyes not as wide as pronotum..................... P. striatifrons Epistoma bidentate; head across eyes as wide as pronotum.................................. P. vitiensis ”

Curiously, Dillon and Dillon (1952) redescribed just the female of P. striatifrons , and in the list of material examined of that species, appear three females and not any males. Both the key presented by the authors and the redescription, and differences mentioned, serve only to separate males from females of P. striatifrons , and does not separate P. striatifrons from P. vitiensis .

The redescription by Fairmaire (1881) contradicts the key above: “epistomate inter mandibula vix producto, late sinuato, utrinque angulato.” Apparently, Dillon and Dillon (1952) interpreted that the apex of labrum of P. striatifrons is unidentate, as opposed to P. vitiensis that would have the apex of labrum bidentate. This assumption is not confirmed by examination of the photograph of the holotype and, moreover, Dillon and Dillon (1952) had not taken into consideration the work of Fairmaire (1881) regarding the form of the head (“capite prothorace haud angustiore”), when they affirmed that the “head across eyes not as wide as pronotum.” The differences in the mandibles of the females of the “two species”, pointed out by those authors, are just intraspecific variations.

When dealing with P. vitiensis, Dillon and Dillon (1952) , probably, interpreted the work by Nonfried (1894), “vorne doppelt geschwift”, as if the apex of the labrum was bidentate. In fact, the work by Nonfried (1894) indicates that this author was speaking of the notches to the side of the apex of labrum (typical and more evident in females). Again, Dillon and Dillon (1952) failed to take into consideration the work by Nonfried (1894) regarding the form of the head (“Kopf schmal”), because they affirmed, as seen above in the key, that the head in this species is as wide as the pronotum.

Moreover, the examination of the probable holotype female of P. vitiensis , the photograph of the probable holotype male of P. striatifrons , and the material examined [that includes the material used by Dillon and Dillon (1952)], shows that there are not any differences between these two species. In other words, the synonymy proposed by Lameere (1902) is correct: P. vitiensi s = P. striatifrons .

Figures

Figure 1-44. Labrum. 1) Papuandra araucariae, male. 2) P. araucariae, female. 3) P. gressitti, holotype male. 4) P. weigeli, holotype male. 5) P. weigeli, paratype female. 6) P. queenslandensis, holotype female. 7) P. norfolkensis, holotype male. 8) P. norfolkensis, paratype female. 9) P. rothschildi, holotype male. 10) P. rothschildi, paratype female. 11) P. oberthueri, holotype female. 12) Caledonandra austrocaledonica, male. 13) C. austrocaledonica, female. 14) C. passandroides, male. 15) C. passandroides, female. 16) Storeyandra frenchi, male. 17) S. frenchi, female. 18) Malukandra heterostyla, holotype male. 19) M. jayawijayana, holotype male. 20) M. hornabrooki, holotype male. 21) M. hornabrooki, paratype female. 22) Melanesiandra striatifrons, male. 23) M. striatifrons, holotype female of Parandra vitiensis. 24) M. solomonensis, male. 25) M. solomonensis, female. 26) M. bougainvillensis, holotype male. 27) M.bougainvillensis, paratype female.28) M.birai, holotype male. 29) Stenandra kolbei, female. 30) Hawaiiandra puncticeps, male. 31) Komiyandra janus, female. 32) K. shibatai, male. 33) K. shibatai, female. 34) K. formosana, male. 35) K. formosana, female. 36) K. lanyuana, male. 37) K. lanyuana, female. 38) K. javana, holotype male. 39) K. javana, paratype female. 40) K. nayani, paratype male. 41) K. nayani, paratype female. 42) K. ohbayashii, holotype male. 43) K. ohbayashii, paratype female. 44) K. vivesi, holotype male.

Figure 75-89. Head, lateral view, male. 75) Hawaiiandra puncticeps. 76) Storeyandra frenchi. 77) Malukandra heterostyla. 78) M. jayawijayana, holotype. 79) M. hornabrooki, holotype. 80) Caledonandra austrocaledonica. 81) C. passandroides. 82) Melanesiandra striatifrons. 83) M. solomonensis, paratype. 84) M. bougainvillensis, holotype. 85) M. birai, holotype. 86) Papuandra araucariae. 87) P. gressitti, holotype. 88) P. weigeli, holotype. 89) P. norfolkensis, holotype.

Figure 118-147. Mandibles, dorsal view. 118) Birandra (Yvesandra) angulicollis, male. 119) B. (Y.) angulicollis, female. 120) Acutandra araucana, male. 121) Parandra (Parandra) glabra, female. 122) Stenandra kolbei, female. 123) Hawaiiandra puncticeps, male. 124) Storeyandra frenchi, male. 125) S. frenchi, female. 126) Malukandra heterostyla, holotype male. 127) M. jayawijayana, holotype male. 128) M. hornabrooki, holotype male. 129) M. hornabrooki, paratype female. 130) Caledonandra austrocaledonica, male. 131) C. austrocaledonica, female. 132) C. passandroides, male. 133) C. passandroides, female. 134) Melanesiandra striatifrons, male. 135) M. striatifrons, female. 136) M. solomonensis, male. 137) M. solomonensis, female. 138) M. bougainvillensis, holotype male. 139) M. bougainvillensis, paratype female. 140) M. birai, holotype male. 141) Papuandra araucariae, paratype male. 142) P. araucariae, female. 143) P. gressitti, holotype male. 144) P. weigeli, holotype male. 145) P. weigeli, paratype female. 146) P. queenslandensis, holotype male. 147) P. oberthueri, holotype female.

Figure 200-209. 200-204) Maxillary palp. 200) Komiyandra nayani, paratype male. 201) Papuandra araucariae, male. 202) Storeyandra frenchi, female. 203) Melanesiandra striatifrons, male. 204) Acutandra murrayi, female. 205-209) Wing. 205) Acutandra murrayi, female. 206) Neandra brunnea, male. 207) Archandra caspia, male. 208) Parandra (Parandra) ubirajarai, male. 209) Hawaiiandra puncticeps, male.

Figure 210-217. 210-214) Wings. 210) Papuandra araucariae, male. 211) Komiyandra nayani, paratype male. 212) Birandra (Birandra) silvaini, male. 213) Caledonandra passandroides, male. 214) Melanesiandra striatifrons, male. 215-217) Antenna. 215) Stenandra kolbei, female. 216) Hawaiiandra puncticeps, male. 217) Storeyandra frenchi, male.

Figure 218-234. Antenna. 218) Malukandra jayawijayana, holotype male. 219) M. hornabrooki, paratype female. 220) Caledonandra austrocaledonica, male. 221) C. passandroides, male. 222) Melanesiandra striatifrons, male. 223) M. solomonensis, male. 224) M. bougainvillensis, holotype male. 225) M. birai, holotype male.226) Papuandra araucariae, male. 227) P. gressitti, holotype male. 228) P. weigeli, holotype male. 229) P. queenslandensis, holotype female. 230) P. norfolkensis, holotype male. 231) P. rothschildi, paratype male. 232) P. oberthueri, holotype female. 233) Komiyandra janus, female. 234) K. shibatai, male.

Figure 252-276. 252-257) Antenna. 252) Komiyandra drumonti, holotype male. 253) K. cabigasi, paratype male. 254) K. johkii, holotype male. 255) K. poggii, holotype male. 256) K. koni, paratype male. 257) K. uenoi, paratype male. 258-276) Metatarsus. 258) Stenandra kolbei, female. 259) Hawaiiandra puncticeps, male. 260) Storeyandra frenchi, male. 261) Malukandra jayawijayana, holotype male. 262) M. hornabrooki, holotype male. 263) Caledonandra austrocaledonica, male. 264) C. passandroides, male. 265) Melanesiandra striatifrons, male. 266) M. solomonensis, male. 267) M. bougainvillensis, holotype male. 268) M. birai, holotype male. 269) Papuandra araucariae, male. 270) P. gressitti, holotype male. 271) P. weigeli, holotype male. 272) P. queenslandensis, holotype female. 273) P. norfolkensis, holotype male. 274) P. rothschildi, holotype male. 275) oberthueri, holotype female. 276) Komiyandra janus, female.

Figure 300-314. 300-303) Metatarsomere V. 300) Komiyandra shibatai, male. 301) K. formosana, male. 302) K. lanyuana, male. 303) K. uenoi, holotype male. 304-311) Aedeagus. 304) K. shibatai, parameres. 305) K. shibatai, median lobe. 306) K. formosana, parameres. 307) K. formosana, median lobe. 308) K. lanyuana, parameres. 309) K. lanyuana, median lobe. 310) K. uenoi, paratype parameres. 311) K. uenoi, paratype median lobe. 312-314) Antennomere XI. 312) K. nayani, paratype male. 313) K. javana, holotype male. 314) Melanesiandra striatifrons, male.

Figure 373-378. Habitus. 373) Caledonandra passandroides, male, dorsal view. 374) C. passandroides, male, ventral view. 375) C. passandroides, female, dorsal view. 376) Melanesiandra striatifrons, male, dorsal view. 377) M. striatifrons, male, ventral view. 378) M. striatifrons, holotype female of Parandra vitiensis.