Rhenechinus hopstaetteri Dehm, 1953
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.2011.0098 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/96538795-7377-FFF7-FFCD-FD83FBF5F8DA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rhenechinus hopstaetteri Dehm, 1953 |
status |
|
Rhenechinus hopstaetteri Dehm, 1953 View in CoL
Figs. 6 View Fig , 7 View Fig .
1952 “Ein Seeigel aus dem Hunsrückschiefer”; Hopstätter 1952: 33.
1953 Rhenechinus hopstätteri View in CoL ; Dehm 1953: 93, pl. 5: 1–4.
1961 Rhenechinus hopstätteri Dehm, 1953 View in CoL ; Kuhn 1961: 33, figs. 15, 16.
1966 Rhenechinus hopstatteri Dehm, 1953 View in CoL ; Kier 1966: U303, fig.224.2.
1970 Rhenechinus hopstätteri Dehm, 1953 View in CoL ; Kutscher 1970a: 40.
1970 Rhenechinus hopstätteri Dehm, 1953 View in CoL ; Kutscher 1970b: 96.
1980 Rhenechinus hopstaetteri Dehm, 1953 View in CoL ; Mittmeyer 1980: 38.
1990 Rhenechinus hopstätteri Dehm, 1953 View in CoL ; Bartels and Brassel 1990: 181, fig. 169.
1997 “Seeigel Rhenechinus hopstätteri View in CoL mit erhaltenen Stacheln“; Bartels et al. 1997: 49, fig. 61.
1998 Rhenechinus hopstaetteri Dehm, 1953 View in CoL ; Bartels et al. 1998: 210, fig. 188.
1999 Rhenechinus hopstätteri Dehm, 1953 View in CoL ; Jahnke and Bartels 1999: 43.
2000 Rhenechinus hopstätteri Dehm, 1953 View in CoL ; Jahnke and Bartels 2000: 43.
Holotype: BSPG. 1955 I 585.
Type horizon: Hunsrück Slate, Lower Emsian, Lower Devonian.
Type locality: Bundenbach, Rhineland−Palatinate, Germany.
Material.— One specimen, DBM.HS.285, Eschenbach−Bocksberg mine, Bundenbach, Rhineland−Palatinate, Germany .
Diagnosis.—A species of Rhenechinus with up to 8 interambulacral columns in a zone with plates of rather irregular shape and size; surface of plates lacking pitted ornamentation. Description.—The holotype ( Fig. 6 View Fig ) shows an articulated test in oral view and the new specimen ( Fig. 7 View Fig ) is a complete test squashed in lateral profile. The test must have been subglobular in life and taller than wide, with a diameter up to approximately 10 cm. Apical disc unknown but relatively small, as the ambulacra converge adapically ( Fig. 7A View Fig ).
Ambulacral zones are narrow and biserial with a primary element alternating with a small demiplate in each half ambulacrum ( Fig. 6B View Fig ). Pore−pairs are prominent and offset forming a double series in each column. The pore−pairs are about 1 mm in width with an obvious periporal rim; the inner pore pierces the plate rather than forming a marginal notch. There are small granules scattered on the adradial and perradial sides of the zone of pore−pairs. Towards the peristome plates become narrower and wider, and pore−pairs become smaller. Ambulacral plating appears to extend further onto the peristome than interambulacral plates ( Fig. 6C View Fig ).
Interambulacral plates are up to 6 mm in width and irregularly polygonal in outline. At the widest point there are some nine plates abreast. Only the adradial series of plates form a regular column and these may bear slightly larger tubercles than other plates. Plates are relatively thin—not much more than 0.6 mm in thickness, and have bevelled edges. A single plate forms the adoral boundary to the peristome and this is followed by two plates that just touch interradially and then by three plates, a large central hexagonal plate and two adradial pentagonal plates ( Fig. 6C View Fig ).
A membrane of small platelets covers the peristome ( Fig. 6C View Fig ), which is about 20 mm in diameter. While ambulacral plates extend a little way onto this membranous region, they are confined to the outer region.
Spines are up to 4 mm in length and are concentrated in the peristomial and ambulacral zones ( Figs. 6A View Fig , 7B View Fig ). There are several slender spines to each ambulacral plate, with somewhat longer spines being found adradially and shorter spines perradially. Small spines are also found on interambulacral plates but are not nearly as dense nor as long. Small spinate tridactylous pedicellariae are present on interambulacral plates (Figs. 5E, 7B). These are approximately 1 mm long and have a swollen base and long spine−like blades that are in contact along most of their length. The pedicellarial head rests on a small element some 0.2 mm in width that is either a stem element (as described by Haude 1998) or a small tubercle (preservation is not adequate to distinguish).
The lantern is present but internal. Hemipyramid tips can be seen ( Fig. 7C View Fig ) and show a deep abaxial groove for retractor and protractor muscle insertion. The teeth that protrude have a flat axial face and are simple oligolamellar in strucure with four or five laths abreast on each half. They end at a simple point.
Remarks.—The original description given by Dehm (1953) is detailed and largely correct. The new specimen provides additional information about the test shape and about the distribution of spines and pedicellariae. This is a species that attains almost twice the size of the Spanish species but we do not think the diagnostic differences are simply size related. Although R. ibericus may increase the number of interambulacral columns in each zone as it grows, the surface ornament in the two species is quite distinct with the Spanish species having a strongly pitted surface and the German species a smooth, unpitted surface.
One other echinoid, Porechinus porosus is known from the same formation ( Dehm 1961) and this does have a strongly pitted ornament to its plate surfaces. However, it differs in having distinctly thicker plating and ambulacral plates that are uniserially arranged. All the other echinoid specimens of the Lower Emsian Hunsrück Slate ( Lepidocentrus spp. ; Table 1) are based on fragmentary material and need to be revised. This is made especially difficult by the incomplete nature of the type material of Lepidocentrus ( Müller 1857) .
Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Hunsrück Slate, Lower Emsian, Lower Devonian; Gemünden and Bundenbach, Rhineland−Palatinate, Germany.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rhenechinus hopstaetteri Dehm, 1953
Smith, Andrew B., Reich, Mike & Zamora, Samuel 2013 |
Rhenechinus hopstätteri
Jahnke, H. & Bartels, C. 2000: 43 |
Rhenechinus hopstätteri
Jahnke, H. & Bartels, C. 1999: 43 |
Rhenechinus hopstaetteri
Bartels, C. & Briggs, D. E. G. & Brassel, G. 1998: 210 |
Rhenechinus hopstätteri
Bartels, C. & Brassel, G. 1990: 181 |
Rhenechinus hopstaetteri
Mittmeyer, H. - G. 1980: 38 |
Rhenechinus hopstätteri
Kutscher, F. 1970: 40 |
Rhenechinus hopstätteri
Kutscher, F. 1970: 96 |
Rhenechinus hopstätteri
Kuhn, O. 1961: 33 |
Rhenechinus hopstätteri
Dehm, R. 1953: 93 |