Eumenes pomiformis ( Fabricius, 1781 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4317.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0D977C9B-2B9C-46E7-B154-E795B7Ff5B01 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4489837 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9518B56B-C451-8103-FF52-F921B9D5F976 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eumenes pomiformis ( Fabricius, 1781 ) |
status |
|
12. Eumenes pomiformis ( Fabricius, 1781) View in CoL
( FigS 61–68 View FIGURES 61 – 66 View FIGURES 67 – 68 )
Vespa pomiformis Fabricius, 1781: 467 —“ Italia ” (lectotype ♀ coll. Fabricius).
Eumenis [!] mediterranea var. heri Kriechbaumer, 1879: 88 , ♂—“Dalmatien” (coll. Sturm; ZSM).
Eumenes pomiformis View in CoL ; Berland, 1928: 7 (key), 8, figs. 3, 6, 9, 10-13 [included other species as “subspecies” or “var”]; Giordani Soika, 1932: 125 (Venezia); Giordani Soika, 1933: 22, fig. 1 p (larva and ethology of “ E. pomiformis View in CoL ”); Giordani Soika, 1935: 162 (key), 163; Blüthgen, 1938: 480 (key), 490 (lectotype designation; syn.: E. lunulatus View in CoL F.), 494, fig. 1, ♀); Blüthgen, 1942: 10 (Saale valley); Giordani Soika, 1942: 5 (Italy); Giordani Soika, 1943: 29 -32, fig. 1 (5) (compared to three new species); Giordani Soika, 1944: 7 (Sicily); Blüthgen, 1952: 350 (Switzerland); Castro, 1986: 299 (Spain); Castro, 1997: 4 (cat.); Gusenleitner, 2007: 108 (Turkey); Gusenleitner, 2008: 36 (list); Yildirim & Gusenleitner, 2009: 940 (Turkey); Gusenleitner, 2010: 444, pl. 38 (United Arab Emirates); Zhou et al., 2012: 468 (key); Oehlke, 2012: 597 View Cited Treatment (Kyrgyzstan; Uzbekistan); Gusenleitner, 2013: 28 View Cited Treatment (central and southern Europe; north west Africa; Malta; Turkey; Lebanon; Ukraine; southern European Russia); Neumeyer & Praz, 2015: 316 (notes on type).
Eumenes pomiformis pomiformis View in CoL ; Giordani Soika, 1953: 238 ( Morocco); Blüthgen, 1961: 205, fig. 62 (key), 209 (distinguished from E. lunulatus View in CoL (F.); revision necessary); Giordani Soika, 1965: 16, figs. 5-8 (compared to E. subpomiformis View in CoL ); Blüthgen & Königsmann, 1969: 925 ( aff. pomiformis View in CoL ; Albania); Gusenleitner, 1970: 165 (syn.: E. fastidiosissimus View in CoL ); Gusenleitner, 1972: 99, figs. 9b, 10, 17f, 100 ( Tajikistan); van der Vecht & Fischer, 1972: 131 (cat.); Madl, 1997: 825 ( Turkey).
Eumenes fastidiosissimus Giordani Soika, 1943: 29 View in CoL , fig. 1 (2, 4), ♂ (in subgenus Eumenes View in CoL )—“Italia-Venezia Giulia, Strada Vicentina” (lectotype MVEN); also from Austria; Giordani Soika, 1973a: 34 (designation of lectotype); Borsato & Ratti, 1999: 76 (syn. of E. pomiformis pomiformis (Fabricius)) View in CoL .
Eumenes pomiformis turcicus Giordani Soika, 1952 (1951) View in CoL : 367, ♂, ♀ (in subgenus Eumenes View in CoL )—[Turkey] “Toros, Bürücek” (lectotype ♂ NMP); also from Gyaur daglari; Gusenleitner, 1970: 165 (holotype examined; paratypes partly = E. lunulatus View in CoL F.); Gusenleitner, 1972: 101; van der Vecht & Fischer, 1972: 132 (cat.); Giordani Soika, 1973a: 39 (designation of lectotype); Gusenleitner, 1997: 137, 144 (syn. of E. pomiformis (Fabricius)) View in CoL ; Gusenleitner, 1999: 561, 573 (syn. of E. pomiformis (Fabricius)) View in CoL ; Borsato & Ratti, 1999: 90 (syn. of E. pomiformis pomiformis (Fabricius)) View in CoL .
Diagnosis. ♀ ( Figs 61–65 View FIGURES 61 – 66 ). Punctation of T2 relatively coarse and not very dense ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 61 – 66 ); hairs of T2 much Shorter than thoSe at baSe of T1 ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 61 – 66 ); T2, in profile, little Swollen in middle, weakly impreSSed preapically, with the apical margin Slightly reflected; tegUla normal, withoUt lateral emargination in itS anterior third; T1 pear- Shaped, itS apex with a wide yellow band, and pair of browniSh markS in yellow band ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 61 – 66 ); temple with hairS; legS black with yellow.
Colour description. ♀. Body black with broad yellow markings. Yellow: apex of labrum; clypeus except median roUnded black Spot; mark on interantennal Space toUching eye; Scape Ventrally; narrow mark on temple; broad band on pronotUm; Spot on meSepiSternUm; tegUla; parategUla; interrUpted band on baSe of ScUtellUm; UninterrUpted band on metanotUm; large Vertical band on either Side of propodeUm; pair of large roUnd SpotS on either Side of T1 at middle and a broad apical band, emarginate at middle; pair of large tranSVerSe markS at baSe of T2 and broad apical band, emarginate at middle and Sharply narrowed towardS SideS; broad apical band on S2, Sharply narrowed towardS SideS; T3–T5 & S3–S5 with almoSt waVy apical bandS. LegS yellow except all coxa, all trochanterS, baSal half of fore and mid femora and hind femora almoSt entirely black. SometimeS Small to large roUnded Spot on coxa. Pair of characteriStic browniSh markS in apical yellow band of T1. WingS hyaline. HairS SilVery white. Body length: 10 mm.
Ƌ ( FigS 66–68 View FIGURES 61 – 66 View FIGURES 67 – 68 ). Apical antennal article hook-like, reaching middle of 10th Segment in cUrVed poSition (fig. 68). ColoUr aS that of ♀ except clypeUS entirely yellow, apical 2–3 antennal articleS yellow, yellow mark on inner ocUlar margin below ocUlar SinUS, T6 & S6 with apical yellow band. Body length: 10 mm.
Material examined. INDIA: JammU & KaShmir , Ladakh , Kargil, 3 ♂, 13–14.Vi.1973, Coll. V.K. GUpta & Party, ZSIK Regd. Nos. ZSI/ WGRS /I.R-INV.8349–8351; Ladakh, Leh, 1 ♂, 19.vi.1973, Coll. V.K. Gupta & Party, ZSIK Regd. No. ZSI/ WGRS /I.R-INV.8352 . PAKISTAN: QUetta, 1 ♀, Vii.1902, Coll. DUdgeon, ZSIK Regd. No. ZSI/ WGRS /I.R-INV.8353.
Distribution. * India: JammU & KaShmir; France; Spain; Italy; Switzerland; Germany; AUStria; Czech RepUblic; Croatia; Serbia; Albania; BUlgaria; Greece; Malta; BelarUS; Ukraine: Crimea; KyrgyzStan; TajikiStan; UzbekiStan; SoUthern EUropean RUSSia; China; * PakiStan: QUetta; TUrkey; Lebanon; United Arab EmirateS; TUniSia; Morocco.
Remarks. The Indian popUlation of E. pomiformis SeemS to be characterized by haVing mUch more extenSiVe markingS than EUropean and other weStern formS of the SpecieS, bUt a detailed StUdy woUld be neceSSary to See if thiS iS jUSt clinal Variation.
WGRS |
Western Ghat Regional Station of the Zoological Survey of India at Calicut |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eumenes pomiformis ( Fabricius, 1781 )
Sureshan, Pavittu M. 2017 |
Eumenes pomiformis turcicus
Gusenleitner 1999: 561 |
Borsato 1999: 90 |
Gusenleitner 1997: 137 |
Giordani 1973: 39 |
Gusenleitner 1972: 101 |
Vecht 1972: 132 |
Gusenleitner 1970: 165 |
Madl 1997: 825 |
Gusenleitner 1972: 99 |
Vecht 1972: 131 |
Gusenleitner 1970: 165 |
Bluthgen 1969: 925 |
Giordani 1965: 16 |
Bluthgen 1961: 205 |
Giordani 1953: 238 |
Eumenes fastidiosissimus
Borsato 1999: 76 |
Giordani 1973: 34 |
Giordani 1943: 29 |
Neumeyer 2015: 316 |
Gusenleitner 2013: 28 |
Zhou 2012: 468 |
Oehlke 2012: 597 |
Gusenleitner 2010: 444 |
Gusenleitner 2009: 940 |
Gusenleitner 2008: 36 |
Gusenleitner 2007: 108 |
Castro 1997: 4 |
Castro 1986: 299 |
Bluthgen 1952: 350 |
Giordani 1944: 7 |
Giordani 1943: 29 |
Bluthgen 1942: 10 |
Giordani 1942: 5 |
Bluthgen 1938: 480 |
Giordani 1935: 162 |
Giordani 1933: 22 |
Giordani 1932: 125 |
Berland 1928: 7 |
Eumenis
Kriechbaumer 1879: 88 |
Vespa pomiformis
Fabricius 1781: 467 |