Scotiophryne sp.

Gardner, James D., Redman, Cory M. & Cifelli, Richard L., 2016, The Hopping Dead: Late Cretaceous Frogs From The Middle - Late Campanian (Judithian) Of Western North America, Fossil Imprint 72 (1 - 2), pp. 78-107 : 83

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.14446/FI.2016.78

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/947587F2-6670-FFCF-FBD4-14E0FAF4F7BB

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Scotiophryne sp.
status

 

cf. Scotiophryne sp.

( Text-fig. 3l, m View Text-fig )

M a t e r i a l a n d o c c u r r e n c e s: Maxilla from

Judith River Formation, Montana, USA (Appendix 2).

D e s c r i p t i o n: The sole example, AMNH FARB 33045, is an incomplete left maxilla about 6.3 mm in preserved length ( Text-fig. 3l, m View Text-fig ). It preserves the suborbital region and the adjacent pre- and postorbital regions. Anteriorly the specimen is broken through the base of the processus frontalis and posteriorly it is broken just behind the level of the processus pterygoideus. The preserved portion of the pars facialis is moderately deep. Its incomplete pre-and postorbital portions are moderately high, and enclose between them a moderately concave margo orbitalis that is lingually thickened. A well-developed facet for contact with the squamosal extends anteriorly along the dorsolingual surface of the preserved portion of the processus zygomatico-maxillaris, onto the adjacent (i.e., posterior) portion of the suborbital region. Although it is sheared off, judging by its broken base the processus pterygoideus would have been well developed. The lamina horizontalis is relatively deep and lingually narrow, with its lingual surface vertical and shallowly convex lingually. The posteriorly incomplete tooth row extends posteriorward at least as far as the level of the processus pterygoideus. No teeth are intact, but smooth rims on the better preserved bases suggest the teeth were pedicellate. The labial surface of the pars facialis is ornamented. Across the preserved portion of the postorbital region and about the posterior three-quarters of the suborbital region, labial ornament consists of small, moderately spaced tubercles. More anteriorly, those tubercles give way to low, irregular ridges enclosing shallow pits. The ventral portion of the ornamented surface is dominated by short, irregular ridges oriented horizontally along the posterior portion and shallowly inclined dorsally along the anterior portion.

R e m a r k s: In terms of its general structure and size, the above-described maxilla from Clambank Hollow is most similar to Judithian and Lancian maxillae of Scotiophryne pustulosa (Estes 1969: fig. 2c–f; Gardner 2008: fig. 13.1L–M; Roček et al. 2010: fig. 16Aj–l and Bd; here: Text-fig. 3a–d View Text-fig ) and Judithian maxillae described below for our unnamed genus and species I ( Text-fig. 6a–h View Text-fig ). It differs from both in being slightly deeper through the suborbital region and in that its labial ornament is somewhat intermediate, being predominantly formed by tubercles but also with some ridges. Even in the region where the Scotiophryne -like ornament is best developed on AMNH FARB 33045, those bony tubercles are more broadly separated, rather than being more closely packed as in examples from the Judithian of Utah ( Roček et al. 2010: fig. 16Aj–l; here: Text-fig. 3a, b View Text-fig ) and especially in geologically younger maxillae from the Lance and Hell Creek formations (Estes 1969: fig. 2d, e; Gardner 2008: fig. 13.1L, N). To highlight the distinctiveness of this unusual maxilla from the Judith River Formation and in recognition of its Scotiophryne -like ornament, we identify this specimen as cf. Scotiophryne sp.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Amphibia

Order

Anura

Family

Alytidae

Genus

Scotiophryne

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF