Encyrtinae
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5389.1.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5D707367-7028-4D84-97E6-75AAC1F8EB30 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10407523 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/930187E5-FFAA-2554-FF4C-F99A91EB7E9A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Encyrtinae |
status |
|
Key to European amber genera of Encyrtinae (females)
1 (4) Postmarginal vein shorter than marginal vein.
2 (3) Hypopygium extending past apex of syntergum.................................... Protaphycus Simutnik, 2022
3 (2) Hypopygium not extending apex of syntergum................................. Electrocerus Simutnik , gen. nov.
4 (1) Postmarginal vein not shorter than marginal vein.
5 (6) Row of filum spinosum double, consisting of 9 setae..................................... Efesus Simutnik, 2020
6 (5) Row of filum spinosum single, consisting of 2–6 setae.
7 (8) Funicle as long as clava. All funicle segments wider than long.......................... Dencyrtus Simutnik, 2018
8 (7) Funicle longer than clava. At least some funicle segments longer than wide.
9 (10) Mesoscutum with large, deep, rare punctures..................................... Ektopicercus Simutnik, 2020
10 (9) Mesoscutum without large punctures.
11 (12) Antenna thin, filiform. Clava about 5.5× as long as wide......................... Protocopidosoma Simutnik, 2017
12 (11) Antenna not filiform, clavate. Clava about 3× as long as wide.......................... Rovnosoma Simutnik, 2015
The key does not include the genus Glaesus Simutnik, 2014 , which is only known from a male specimen. Its postmarginal vein is longer than the marginal vein.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |