Desmoxytes spectabilis ( Attems, 1937 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3931.4.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F14AF9A-3E4C-4A30-960B-8C612220D4E4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6118681 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/90032A20-FFD5-B572-66F0-66A1A96E2523 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Desmoxytes spectabilis ( Attems, 1937 ) |
status |
|
Desmoxytes spectabilis ( Attems, 1937) View in CoL
Figs 11–12 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12
Centrodesmus spectabilis Attems, 1937: 124 View in CoL (D).
Centrodesmus spectabilis View in CoL — Attems, 1938: 235 (D).
Pratinus spectabilis View in CoL — Jeekel, 1964: 62 (D, M); 1968: 61 (M).
Hylomus spectabilis View in CoL — Jeekel, 1980: 657 (M, R); Golovatch, 1983: 181 (M).
Desmoxytes spectabilis View in CoL — Golovatch & Enghoff, 1994: 48, 61 (D, M); Enghoff et al., 2004: 38 (R); Nguyen et al., 2006: 255 (D); Nguyen & Sierwald, 2013: 1242 (R).
Holotype male (NHMW-4242), Vietnam, Thừa Thiên-Huế Province, Bana Mountain, 1500 m a.s.l., 19.09.1931, leg. C. Dawydoff.
Redescription. Length ca 34 mm (male), width of midbody pro- and metazonae 2.5 and 6.4 mm (male), respectively (versus length ca 35 mm (male),width of midbody pro- and metazonae 4.5 and 6.5 mm (male), respectively, as given in the original descriptions ( Attems, 1937, 1938)).
Coloration of alcohol material upon long-term preservation red-brown ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 A–I); head, venter and legs pale yellow-brown, tips of antennae dark brown ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 A–I) (versus dark chestnut brown; first two legs yellow, other legs yellow-brown; tips of paraterga and posterior spines of metaterga pale yellowish, as given in the original descriptions ( Attems, 1937, 1938)).
Clypeolabral region and vertex sparsely setose, epicranial suture distinct. Antennae rather short ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 A & B), reaching segment 3 (male) when stretched dorsally. In width, head <collum <segment 2 = 3 <4 <5–17 (male); thereafter body gently and gradually tapering. Collum with three transverse rows of small setigerous spines: 2+2 anterior, 1+1 intermediate, and 3+3 posterior; paraterga wing-shaped, directed dorsolaterad, with two evident incisions ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 A & B). Tegument invariably dull, prozonae finely shagreened, metazonae coarsely microgranulate, surface below paraterga and sterna microgranulate ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 A–F & I). Postcollum metaterga with two transverse rows of rounded knobs, 2+2 anterior and 1+1 posterior ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 A, C & F). Axial line visible. Paraterga ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 A–F & I) wing-shaped; directed dorsolaterad, tips bent posteriad, in segments 2–6 strongly upturned; in following segments slightly upturned, always lying above dorsum; anterior edge with three evident incisions in segments 2–7, with four strong incisions/teeth on following segments, basal one being strongest. Posterior edge of metaterga with two lobes near base of paraterga ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 A, C & F). Ozopores (Op) lateral, lying at base of third incision. Transverse sulcus complete on segments 5–18, narrow, shallow, line-shaped, reaching bases of paraterga; incomplete on segment 4, absent from segment 19 ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 A, C & F). Stricture between pro- and metazonae narrow, deep, ribbed at bottom down to base of paraterga ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 A–F). Pleurosternal carinae with complete crests in segments 2 and 3, a front bulge and a small caudal tooth in segment 4, absent thereafter. Epiproct unusual ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 C, F & E), flattened dorsoventrally, with 3+3 evident spines near tip, the latter with four small knobs. Hypoproct subtrapeziform, setiferous knobs at a slightly convex caudal edge medium-sized and wellseparated.
Sterna sparsely setose, without modifications; cross-impressions shallow; a pair of small, fully rounded, completely separated, setose cones between male coxae 4 ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 G & H). Legs rather long and slender, midbody ones ca 1.2–1.3 (male) as long as body height, male prefemora 7 inflated medially, male tarsal brushes absent.
Gonopods ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ) suberect. Prefemur densely setose, ca 1/3 as long as fermorite + postfemoral part. Femorite very stout, enlarged distad, seminal groove running entirely on mesal face. Solenophore (= lamina medialis) welldeveloped, with a strong process (Z); solenomere rather short, flagelliform, well separated at base from solenophore.
Remark. Nguyen et al. (2006) redescribed this species from new topotypic material. Here we treat the holotype.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Desmoxytes spectabilis ( Attems, 1937 )
Likhitrakarn, Natdanai, Golovatch, Sergei I. & Panha, Somsak 2015 |
Desmoxytes spectabilis
Nguyen 2013: 1242 |
Nguyen 2006: 255 |
Enghoff 2004: 38 |
Golovatch 1994: 48 |
Hylomus spectabilis
Golovatch 1983: 181 |
Jeekel 1980: 657 |
Pratinus spectabilis
Jeekel 1964: 62 |
Centrodesmus spectabilis
Attems 1938: 235 |
Centrodesmus spectabilis
Attems 1937: 124 |