Ophiophycis johni McKnight, 2003
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.279037 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6192728 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8E64650D-F366-5E2F-3FD3-5CA44506FCF7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ophiophycis johni McKnight, 2003 |
status |
|
Ophiophycis johni McKnight, 2003
Ophiophycis aff. guillei – Vadon 1991: 339 –341, figs 3, 4, 15–17.
Material. Sta. DW1650C: 1 spm.
Remarks. The specimen reported by Vadon (1991) is similar to O. johni according to the images and here proposed as conspecific. The species is separated from O. guillei Vadon, 1991 by a smaller disk size, fewer proximal arm joints incorporated into the disk, fewer tentacle pores, dorsal arm plates and enlarged lateral arm plates. Vadon (1991) considered that these characters may be caused by the small size of her specimens (2–4 mm dd) compared to the holotype of O. guillei (6 mm dd) and refrained from describing them as a separate species. McKnight's (2003) specimen was with 5.5 mm dd almost as large as O. guillei , which suggestst that these characters are indeed species specific. The Lifou specimen is with 2.8 mm dd comparable to Vadon's specimens. It is clearly identified by its distinctely stellate (five-lobed) centrodorsal plate, the swollen disk plates and the glass bead-like structure of the plates.
Distribution. This new record extends the depth range to a shallow 200–260 m, whereas previous New Caledonian records were collected at 410–1640 m. In New Zealand waters the species was found at 985–1000 m.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ophiophycis johni McKnight, 2003
Stöhr, Sabine 2011 |
Ophiophycis aff. guillei
Vadon 1991: 339 |