Petrochelidon andecola oroyae Chapman
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090(2003)278<0001:tsobit>2.0.co;2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12775755 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8D160F03-FFAA-FF80-7CA7-FB8F1D9BFF24 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Petrochelidon andecola oroyae Chapman |
status |
|
Petrochelidon andecola oroyae Chapman
Petrochelidon andecola oroyae Chapman, 1924a: 12 (Oroya, 12,500 ft, Dept. Junin, Central Peru).
Now Petrochelidon andecola oroyae Chapman, 1924 . See Peters, 1960b: 119, and Turner and Rose, 1989: 209–210.
HOLOTYPE: AMNH 166022 About AMNH , adult male, collected at La Oroya, 12,500 ft, 11°32′S, 75°54′W ( Stephens and Traylor 1983: 113), Junín, Peru, on 4 March 1913, by Rollo H. Beck (no. 224) on the Brewster–Sanford Expedition. GoogleMaps
COMMENTS: The AMNH number was given in the original description. Paratypes are AMNH 166021, male, and AMNH 166023, female, from Oroya, and AMNH 177266, immature male, from Chipa.
Many authors currently do not recognize Petrochelidon as a genus separate from Hirundo ; however, recent DNA–DNA hybridization studies ( Sheldon and Winkler, 1993) have shown Petrochelidon to be monophyletic. The American Ornithologists’ Union (1998: 461) has again separated the two genera.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Petrochelidon andecola oroyae Chapman
LeCROY, M. A. R. Y. 2003 |
Petrochelidon andecola oroyae
Turner, A. & C. Rose 1989: 209 |
Peters, J. L. 1960: 119 |
Petrochelidon andecola oroyae
Chapman, F. M. 1924: 12 |