Hylica scutealba Tang & Zhang, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5319.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B3C166E5-3B69-4DA5-BBA2-EB57EBBED390 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8224712 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8B17296D-CA10-FFA9-A98A-ECFA7AF572D8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hylica scutealba Tang & Zhang |
status |
|
Hylica scutealba Tang & Zhang View in CoL
Figs. 6C–F View FIGURES 6 , 9E–F View FIGURES 9 , 12E View FIGURES 12 , 14A–C View FIGURES 14 , 15D, J, 16E–H, 20A–G, 29A
Diagnosis. Pronotum with median carina present in anterior half, anterior margin evenly rounded, carinate, carinae diverging posteriorly till midlength of pronotum, with pair of elevated carinae on either side of median line in posterior half. Hind wing costal margin with 3 stout spines in proximal half ( Fig. 14B, C View FIGURES 14 ). Abdominal pleurites III–VIII evenly rounded without posterolateral spines, pleurites of pregenital segment (segment VII in female and VIII in male) lamellate with posterolateral angle produced into unforked spine. Aedeagus with shaft more or less of uniform width throughout in ventral view, dorsal surface in distal 0.5 length transversely wrinkled. Female sternite VII more or less rectangular with posterolateral angles rounded ( Fig. 15J View FIGURES 15 ).
Material examined. INDIA: Karnataka: Bangalore, 1 ♁, 1 ♀, Yellow pan trap in Chilli crop, yellow pan trap 1–6.x.1980, Bidari ; 1 ♁, 18–23, ix.1980, yellow pan trap, Bidari ; 1 ♁, ix.2001; 1♁, 15.x.2005, Shobha rani; 2♁, 29.vii.2007, Girish ; 1♁, 4.viii.2011, A.N. Reddy; 1♁, 5.ix.2012, Latha ; 2♁, 9.x.2012, Girish ; 1♁, 16.x.2012, Girish ; 16 ♁, 2018. Yellow pan trap, Yeshwanth, H.M.; 1♀, Sirsi, Yana, 262m, 21.ix.2012, Vinayaka T. India : Tamil Nadu: Tiruvannvally [now Tiruvannamalai], 22.x.2000, Prathapan. India : Maharashtra: 4♁, Radhangar, Kolhapur dist. , 26.vi.1990, K.D. Ghorpade. India : Tamil Nadu: Nilgiris, Kunjapana , 29.vii.2019, Shankararaman ( UASB) .
Remarks. Tang & Zhang (2018) described this species based on specimens collected from South India and also illustrated the male and female genitalia. H. paradoxa and H. scutealba are very similar and variable in coloration and size but differ in the shape of anterior half of the pronotum, lateral margins of the abdominal segments and shape of the aedeagus as given in diagnosis of these two species and also in the key above. The female sternite VII is also quite different in the two species (compare figures 15I and 15J). H. scutealba was collected in yellow pan traps run in a chili pepper ( Capsicum annuum L., Solanaceae ) field and by sweeping on low vegetation.
UASB |
University of Agricultural Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |