Oecetis inscripta Kimmins, 1953
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24199/j.mmv.2004.61.7 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8A2B87FC-C864-7006-9FE8-7B70568E10E6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Oecetis inscripta Kimmins |
status |
|
Oecetis inscripta Kimmins View in CoL
Figures 12–14, 105.
Oecetis inscripta Kimmins View in CoL in Mosely and Kimmins, 1953: 294, fig. 208. — Neboiss, 1977: 148, figs 801–803. — Neboiss, 1982: 323, figs 127, 128.
Material examined. Holotype. Male, Bathurst, NSW ( BMNH). 52 samples in ANIC, NMV and WARI.
Diagnosis. Forewing (Fig. 12) length almost 5 times maximum width, lamina marked with bold dark streaks, not the more usual dark spots or patches; footstalk on fork 1, and t1 and t2 contiguous, t3 more proximal than the 2 other crossveins of the posterior anastomosis. In the male genitalia (Figs 13, 14), a rounded basodorsal lobe on the inferior appendages and infer-ior appendages in ventral view slender with length 3 times maximum width, irregularly tapered towards apex.
Distribution. Eastern Australia from Tas. northwards almost to Cairns, north-eastern Qld, probably widespread in Murray–Darling basin (Fig. 105).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Oecetis inscripta Kimmins
Wells, Alice 2004 |
Oecetis inscripta
Neboiss, A. 1982: 323 |
Neboiss, A. 1977: 148 |
Mosely, M. E. & Kimmins, D. E. 1953: 294 |