Dictis L. Koch, 1872
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5092.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E8B0D583-CB71-465B-9380-45C365B6357A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5876562 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/870687D7-FF8E-FFA9-15A5-95A5A89C92F2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dictis L. Koch, 1872 |
status |
|
Genus Dictis L. Koch, 1872 View in CoL View at ENA
Dictis L. Koch, 1872: 294 View in CoL (type species Dictis striatipes L. Koch, 1872 View in CoL , by original designation and monotypy).
Soeuria Saaristo, 1997: 55 (type species Soeuria soeur Saaristo 1997 View in CoL , by original designation and monotypy). Syn. n.
Diagnosis. Species of the genus Dictis differ from those of Scytodes in having only two tarsal claws ( Figs 1E–F View FIGURE 1 , 11E–F View FIGURE 11 ) (vs. three in Scytodes ).
Synonymy. The synonymy of Soeuria and Dictis is based on the comparison of type and non-type material of S. soeur , with the type species of Dictis , D. striatipes . All examined material have only two tarsal claws, considered diagnostic for the genus. Males of both species have very similar palps with embolus bearing subdistal prolateral pick and a retrolateral hyaline membrane ( Figs 8F–G View FIGURE 8 ; 11G–K View FIGURE 11 ) and females show the typical vulva of Dictis with outer spermathecae on long stalks and inner spermathecae shorter and cylindrical ( Figs 9A, C View FIGURE 9 ; 12B–D View FIGURE 12 ).
Composition. Dictis soeur ( Saaristo, 1997) comb. n., D. elongata Dankittipakul & Singtripop, 2010 , and D. striatipes L. Koch, 1872 .
Distribution. Pantropical ( Figs 15 View FIGURE 15 , 16 View FIGURE 16 ).
Notes. At least three species from Thailand and one from Malaysia were considered new by Dankittipakul & Singtripop (2010). Nevertheless, because they are known from only one sex, they were illustrated and only provisionally described using “open nomenclature” (species A, B, and C). We did not examine this material, but since these species were not formally named and no type material was established, they are not considered valid and within the genus composition. Furthermore, a single female specimen collected in Coetivy, Seychelles was identified by Saaristo (1997) as “ Dictis sp. ”; although we examined this specimen and noticed its considerably larger size in comparison to the rest of the material studied, the absence of males does not allow us to make further taxonomic decisions.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Dictis L. Koch, 1872
Zamani, Alireza, Stockmann, Mark, Magalhaes, Ivan L. F. & Rheims, Cristina A. 2022 |
Soeuria
Saaristo, M. I. 1997: 55 |
Dictis L. Koch, 1872: 294
Koch, L. 1872: 294 |