Urosolenia truncata Liu & Kociolek, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.244.2.4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13681469 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/862A87E4-283F-FFBA-FF18-3F913B22FE89 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Urosolenia truncata Liu & Kociolek |
status |
sp. nov. |
Urosolenia truncata Liu & Kociolek , sp. nov. ( Figs 19–34 View FIGURES 19–27 View FIGURES 28–34 )
LM: frustules solitary, subcylindrical. Valve asymmetrical, conical, forming a long tubular extension. Total frustule length: 120–206 μm, pervalvar length: 33–87 μm, width: 5.8–13.0 μm, extension length: 57–85 μm, girdle band density: 6–8 per 10 μm. SEM: valve areolae regularly arranged, round and small, 11–12 rows per 1 μm, with several poroids irregularly located ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 28–34 ) and extending to the base of the extension. Poroids large, round to elongated, with no rib-like structures present. Girdle band width: 1–2 μm, with small, regularly arranged areolae, 6–10 rows per band, 5–6 rows per 1 μm. Round poroids on the bands and valve ( Figs 31, 34 View FIGURES 28–34 ). Imbrication line visible. Ending of the extension blunt, without any teeth, ligula or seta (figs 29, 32).
Type:— CHINA. Hainan Province: Orchid valley, unnamed stream, in sediments, Y. Liu & L. Li, 14 February 2012 (holotype: HANU!, individual in slide THGZ 2012015, here illustrated as Fig. 20 View FIGURES 19–27 , isotype: COLO! JPK material no. 12HN15).
Etymology: —This species epithet “truncata ” refers to the special shape of the extension tip.
Remarks: —This species similar to U. yalongii , but has a longer extension and denser girdle bands. The most important difference between these two species, however, is the tip of the extension. Urosolenia yalongii has 3–5 teeth at the tip of the extension, but U. truncata has blunt ends. Another species that has a blunt apex of the extension is U. extensa Karthick & Kociolek (2011: 34) , but this species differs by having small branch-like projections on the process, a shorter extension and more narrow frustules ( Karthick & Kociolek 2011).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |