Sericina, Kirby, 1837
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065x(2006)60[144:arotfn]2.0.co;2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FADCBF89-3C12-46F5-90D2-8E8A7031D876 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/86088798-FFD6-FFA1-FF26-E256AC58FB8D |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Sericina |
status |
|
Subtribe SERICINA Kirby, 1837 View in CoL
Original spelling and citation: Sericidae Kirby 1837: 128
Type genus: Serica MacLeay, 1819: 146
Remark: Omalopliites ( Blanchard 1845: 212) was used for taxa within this tribe but this family-group name was not originally Latinized and has not been subsequently Latinized and accepted as valid, therefore it is unavailable. From the context of Blanchard (1845), all his ‘‘Famille’’ and ‘‘Groupe’’ names with the ‘‘–ides’’ and ‘‘–ites’’ suffixes respectively are French vernacular names (some have accents).
Synonym: Homalopliina Burmeister, 1855
Original spelling and citation: Homalopliadae Burmeister 1855: 147
Type genus: Homaloplia Agassiz, 1847: 258
Remark: The type genus is an unjustified emendation of Omaloplia Schönherr, 1817 . Since the emended spelling is not in prevailing usage this name should be considered as a separate, available name. Erichson (1847 b: 700) used Homaloplia in the same year as Agassiz (1847) but the exact publication dates of these works are unclear. Agassiz (1847) is dated 1846 on the cover page so I am assuming that it came out early in the following year.
Synonym: Astaenina Burmeister, 1855
Original spelling and citation: Astaenidae Burmeister 1855: 123
Type genus: Astaena Erichson, 1847: 101 ( Erichson 1847 a)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.