Priceiella (Camurnirmus), 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4313.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A5Fdfba5-F992-44A8-84C2-1756C943C19B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5296981 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/832187E9-FF38-FF71-FF74-63B2FAC9FA33 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Priceiella (Camurnirmus) |
status |
subgen. nov. |
Priceiella (Camurnirmus) Gustafsson & Bush, new subgenus
Type species. Priceiella (Camurnirmus) hwameicola new species
Diagnosis. Priceiella (Camurnirmus) n. subgen. is most similar to Pr. (Torosinirmus) n. subgen., with which it shares the following characters: parameres widely divergent ( Figs 290 View FIGURES 287 – 291 , 298 View FIGURES 294 – 299 , 313 View FIGURES 309 – 314 ); sternal plates and subgenital plates of both sexes ( Figs 285–286 View FIGURES 285 – 286 , 292–293 View FIGURES 292 – 293 , 307–308 View FIGURES 307 – 308 ) without antero-lateral modifications, and male subgenital plate without accessory lateral plates; mesosomes ( Figs 289 View FIGURES 287 – 291 , 297 View FIGURES 294 – 299 , 313 View FIGURES 309 – 314 ) broad, generally irregularly oval or shieldshaped, without rugose nodi. In both subgenera the antennae may be sexually dimorphic ( Figs 294–295 View FIGURES 294 – 299 , 309–310 View FIGURES 309 – 314 ) but this is not the case for all Pr. (Camurnirmus) ( Fig. 287 View FIGURES 287 – 291 ) and not all Pr. (Torosinirmus) (not illustrated). Dorsal preantennal suture is absent in Pr. (Torosinirmus) ( Fig. 309 View FIGURES 309 – 314 ) and may be absent ( Fig. 294 View FIGURES 294 – 299 ) or present around dsms ( Fig. 287 View FIGURES 287 – 291 ) in Pr. (Camurnirmus). The two subgenera differ in the following characters: tergopleurites III without aps in both sexes in Pr. (Camurnirmus) ( Figs 285–286 View FIGURES 285 – 286 , 292–293 View FIGURES 292 – 293 ), but aps are present on tergopleurites III in males of Pr. (Torosinirmus) ( Figs 307–308 View FIGURES 307 – 308 ); ventral side of mesosome more ornate in Pr. (Camurnirmus) ( Figs 289 View FIGURES 287 – 291 , 297 View FIGURES 294 – 299 ) than in Pr. (Torosinirmus) ( Fig. 312 View FIGURES 309 – 314 ), with sinuous marginal thickening and more elaborate gonopores in the former than in the latter; proximal mesosome overlaps with basal apodeme in Pr. (Camurnirmus) ( Figs 288–289 View FIGURES 287 – 291 , 296–287 View FIGURES 294 – 299 ) but not in Pr. (Torosinirmus) ( Figs 311–312 View FIGURES 309 – 314 ).
Description. Both sexes. As the genus description except: abdominal chaetotaxy as in Tables 2 and 8; both sexes without ps on segment III ( Figs 285–286 View FIGURES 285 – 286 , 292–293 View FIGURES 292 – 293 ); antero-lateral corners of sternal plates not thickened ( Figs 285–286 View FIGURES 285 – 286 , 292–293 View FIGURES 292 – 293 ).
Male. Male without aps on tergopleurite III. No accessory sternal plates lateral to male subgenital plate. Proximal mesosome broad, roughly rounded ( Figs 289 View FIGURES 287 – 291 , 297 View FIGURES 294 – 299 ). Mesosomal lobes broad, rounded or triangular. Gonopore with antero-lateral extensions. Ventral rugose nodi absent ( Figs 289 View FIGURES 287 – 291 , 297 View FIGURES 294 – 299 ); 1 ames sensilla on each side antero-lateral of gonopore; 2 pmes microseta antero-lateral to gonopore. Parameres typically widely divergent distally (except Priceiella (Camurnirmus) nipalensis ).
Etymology. The subgeneric name Camurnirmus is formed by Latin “ camur ” for “bent” or “crooked”, referring to the peculiar shape of the parameres of members of this subgenus ( Fig. 288 View FIGURES 287 – 291 ). The ending “ Nirmus ” is a common generic suffix in louse taxonomy, referring to the genus of the same name erected by Nitzsch (1818).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |