Sphaenorhynchus surdus ( Cochran, 1953 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.179890 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5620259 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/820687F4-5775-D828-C989-FB62FE47FAC5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sphaenorhynchus surdus ( Cochran, 1953 ) |
status |
|
Sphaenorhynchus surdus ( Cochran, 1953) View in CoL
Hyla aurantiaca surda Cochran, 1953 View in CoL — Name-bearing type: holotype by original designation, UMMZ 106736, adult male according to original description, SVL 28 mm. – Type locality: "Curitiba, Paraná", Brazil. – Paratypes according to original description – UMMZ 104115, adult male collected with the holotype; UMMZ 104116 A – C, adult males collected in another site in the municipality of Curitiba, state of Paraná, Brazil. Herpetologica, 8: 112.
Other chresonyms:
Hyla aurantiaca : BOULENGER, 1888
Sphoenohyla surda : GOIN, 1957
Sphaenorhynchus surda : GORHAM, 1974
Sphoenorhynchus surdus View in CoL : BOKERMANN, 1966:45
Holotype. MZUM 106736. Adult male. SVL 28 mm, collected at the municipality of Curitiba (approximately 25°25' S; 49°16' O), state of Paraná, Brazil ( Figure 1 View FIGURE 1 ).
Diagnosis [as presented in Cochran (1953)] – No external tympanum; interorbital diameter twice the width of the upper eyelid; a dark dorsolateral line from snout almost to groin.
Description of Holotype. Provided by Cochran (1953).
Advertisement call. Adult males of S. surdus call from the floating vegetation, generally in the deepest portion of temporary or permanent ponds ( Figure 2 View FIGURE 2 ). The advertisement call was described in words by Cochran (1953) as “hitting resonant rocks together quickly 4 or 5 times”. The advertisement call of S. surdus , recorded all over its distribution (municipalities of São Bento do Sul, Lebon Régis, Ponte Serrada, Urubici, Lages, and Lontras, all in the state of Santa Catarina, and municipality of São José dos Ausentes, state of Rio Grande do Sul), but in the type locality, has from 18 to 22 notes, ranging from 1.34 ± 0.13 kHz (range: 0.98 – 1.54; n = 27 notes; 1 male) to 3.41 ± 0.17 kHz (range: 3.17 – 3.85; n = 27 notes; 1 male). The mean dominant frequency is 2.29 ± 0.03 kHz (range: 2.24 – 2.37; n = 27 notes; 1 male). The duration of the call is about 1.7 seconds, but it depends on the number of notes in the calls. The mean duration of an individual note is 0.02 ± 0.004 s (0.01 – 0.03; n = 27 notes; 1 male). The first two notes differ from the remaining by having a much more pulsed structure. There is a short interval between the notes (mean: 0.07 ± 0.007 s; range: 0.05 – 0.08; n = 27 notes; 1 male) ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 ; Figure 3 View FIGURE 3 ).
Species / Locality Duration of Frequency (kHz) Notes / call Duration of Interval Notes type (N) the call (s) or Pulses / the note (ms) between notes
note (ms) Minimum Maximum Dominant
Tadpole. Unknown.
Natural history. Males breed in the hot and rainy season of the year and call from the floating vegetation, generally in permanent ponds. The reproductive mode is probably number 1 (sensu Haddad & Prado 2005): eggs and exotrophic tadpoles in lentic water.
Geographic distribution. Besides the type locality, the species has also been collected in the municipalities of São Bento do Sul, Lebon Régis, Ponte Serrada, Urubici (based on advertisement call recordings), Lages, and Lontras, all in the state of Santa Catarina, and municipality of São José dos Ausentes, state of Rio Grande do Sul ( Figure 8 View FIGURE 8 ).
S. surdus / notes type I (1 male / 4 calls / 27 notes) | Lebon Régis, SC | 1.55–1.99 | 1.34±0.13 (0.98–1.54) | 3.41±0.17 (3.17–3.85) | 2.29±0.03 (2.24–2.37) | 18–22 | 21.70±4.43 (13.0–32.0) | 68.29±6.93 (52.0–86.0) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. surdus / notes type II (1 male / 2 calls / 4 notes) | Lebon Régis, SC | – | 1.12±0.05 (1.05–1.15) | 3.69±0.17 (3.47–3.84) | 2.40±0.02 (2.37–2.41) | 8.75 ± 3.86 (5–14) | 60.25±14.57 (44.0–74.0) | 71.0±10.39 (58.0–82.0) |
S. caramaschii (1 male / 3 calls / 30 notes) | Piraquara, PR | 8.50±2.83 (5.23– 10.20) | 0.94 ± 0.45 (0.11–1.57) | 4.24 ± 0.40 (3.68–5.43) | 2.62 ± 0.09 (2.49–2.76) | 35.0±11.36 (22– 43) | 0.54±0.01 (0.37–0.68) | 220.9±44.3 (183–373) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.