Eumeninae, Leach, 1815
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4171.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9E2B5797-D8C0-4E6D-AE1C-7FF7C2314912 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4499327 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8133EA03-9473-3750-FF31-1CB5B8C1FA4F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eumeninae |
status |
|
Key to the genera of Eumeninae from south India
1. Metasoma petiolate, T 1 in dorsal view usually longer, less than half as wide as T2 ( Figs 74–78 View FIGURES 74 – 78 )....................... 2
- Metasoma not petiolate, T 1 in dorsal view usually broader, more than half as wide as T2 ( Figs 79–85 View FIGURES 79 – 85 )................. 13
2. Mid tibia with two spurs ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 37 – 47 )........................................................................ 3
- Mid tibia with one spur ( Figs 45–47 View FIGURES 37 – 47 )...................................................................... 4
3. Propodeal orifice narrow dorsally ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 37 – 47 ); submarginal carina strongly produced, propodeal valvula elongate and free from submarginal carina posteriorly ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 37 – 47 )....................................................... Zethus Fabricius View in CoL
- Propodeal orifice broad and rounded dorsally ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 37 – 47 ); submarginal carina weakly produced, propodeal valvula and submarginal carina not free posteriorly ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 37 – 47 ).................................................... Discoelius Latreille View in CoL
4. Mesosoma globular, as wide as high ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13 – 18 )............................................................... 5
- Mesosoma more or less flattened dorso-ventrally, distinctly longer than high ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 13 – 18 )............................... 8
5. Pronotum without pretegular carina ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ); T2 with apical lamella ( Fig. 72 View FIGURES 64 – 73 )....................... Eumenes Latreille View in CoL
- Pronotum with pretegular carina ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ); T2 without apical lamella ( Fig. 73 View FIGURES 64 – 73 ).................................... 6
6. T1 (petiole length) less than 1.25 × length of mesosoma, never shorter than mesosoma ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 64 – 73 )......... Delta de Saussure View in CoL
- T1 (petiole length) 1.25 × or more length of mesosoma ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 64 – 73 )............................................... 7
7. Fore wing with prestigma longer than pterostigma ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 55 – 63 ); F11 of ♂ long and hooked ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ).... Phimenes Giordani Soika View in CoL
- Fore wing with prestigma shorter or equals pterostigma ( Fig. 59 View FIGURES 55 – 63 ); F11 of ♂ short, not hooked ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 1 – 12 )................................................................................................ Oreumenoides (de Saussure) View in CoL
8. Axillary fossa oval ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25 – 30 ); propodeal valvula not fused to submarginal carina, submarginal carina produced as a pointeprocess above valvula ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 37 – 47 ); SMC2 basally truncate ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 55 – 63 ); Body size smaller than 10 mm ........................ 9
- Axillary fossa slit-like ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25 – 30 ); propodeal valvula fused to submarginal carina, submarginal carina not produced as a pointed process above valvula ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 37 – 47 ); SMC2 basally acute ( Figs 56–61 View FIGURES 55 – 63 ); Body size more than 10 mm ..................... 10
9. Female with a distinct subcircular fovea below median ocellus ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ); metanotum unidentate ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 48 – 54. 48 ); propodeum not produced; T 1 in dorsal view conspicuously swollen in apical half ( Fig. 66 View FIGURES 64 – 73 )............................. Labus de Saussure View in CoL
- Female without fovea below median ocellus; metanotum not unidentate, precipitous ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 31 – 36 ); propodeum with extensive horizontal portion, somewhat narrowed apically, behind the postscutellum, abruptly sloping posteriorly ( Figs 35 View FIGURES 31 – 36 , 67 View FIGURES 64 – 73 ); T 1 in dorsal view not conspicuously swollen in apical half ( Fig. 67 View FIGURES 64 – 73 ).................................. Cyrtolabulus van der Vecht View in CoL
10. Mesepisternum with epicnemial carina absent ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 13 – 18 )...................................................... 11
- Mesepisternum with epicnemial carina present ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 13 – 18 )...................................................... 12
11. Fore wing with prestigma longer than pterostigma ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 55 – 63 ); female with cephalic foveae ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 12 )... Pareumenes de Saussure View in CoL
- Fore wing with prestigma shorter than pterostigma; female without cephalic foveae............. Pseumenes Giordani Soika View in CoL
12. Mesoscutum without notauli ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 25 – 30 ); S1 transversely striate posteriorly ( Fig. 71 View FIGURES 64 – 73 )............. Coeleumenes van der Vecht View in CoL
- Mesoscutum with notauli; S1 irregularly rugose posteriorly................................ Pseudozumia de Saussure View in CoL
13. SMC2 petiolate anteriorly ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 55 – 63 ); propodeal orifice narrow dorsally............... Alastor Lepeletier de Saint Fargeau View in CoL
- SMC2 not petiolate anteriorly ( Figs 55-61 View FIGURES 55 – 63 ); propodeal orifice broad and rounded dorsally.......................... 14
14. Anterior face of pronotum with two small, deeply impressed medial pits or foveae; which may be sparse ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 19 – 24 ), contiguous ( Figs 21, 22 View FIGURES 19 – 24 ), or faint in some species..................................................................... 15
- Anterior face of pronotum without medial pits or foveae ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 19 – 24 ).............................................. 19
15. T1 without transverse carina........................................................................... 16
- T1 with transverse carina ( Figs 51–53 View FIGURES 48 – 54. 48 )................................................................... 17
16. Anterior face of pronotum with foveae coalesced, punctate laterally ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 19 – 24 ), T1 subsessile, in dorsal view usually narrower than T2 ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 79 – 85 ).............................................................. Paraleptomenes GiordaniSoika View in CoL
- Anterior face of pronotum usually with foveae separated, smooth laterally; T 1 in dorsal view about as broad as T2........................................................................................ Stenodynerus de Saussure View in CoL
17. T1 with two transverse carinae close together at crest of declivity ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 48 – 54. 48 ); T1 wider than long in dorsal view ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 48 – 54. 48 ).................................................................................. Subancistrocerus de Saussure View in CoL
- T1 with one transverse carina ( Figs 52–53 View FIGURES 48 – 54. 48 ); T1 variable in dorsal view......................................... 18
18. Anterior face of pronotum with foveae separated ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 19 – 24 ); T1 smooth basally, forming acarinarium beneath apex of T1 that is often full of mites; T 1 in dorsal view wide and sessile ( Fig. 80 View FIGURES 79 – 85 )............................. Parancistrocerus Bequaert View in CoL
- Anterior face of pronotum with foveae coalesced (foveae contiguous) ( Figs 21, 22 View FIGURES 19 – 24 ); T1 without acarinarium; T 1 in dorsal view longer than wide, T2 much wider than T1......................................... Pseudonortonia Giordani Soika View in CoL
19. T1 with transverse carina ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 48 – 54. 48 )................................................. Lissodynerus Giordani Soika View in CoL
- T1 without transverse carina ( Figs 81–84 View FIGURES 79 – 85 )................................................................. 20
20. T1 with transparent or translucent apical border ( Fig. 81 View FIGURES 79 – 85 ).................................................... 21
- T1 without transparent or translucent apical border ( Figs 82–84 View FIGURES 79 – 85 )...............................................23
21. Parategula not visible from above; tegulae posteriorely bent inwards ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 31 – 36 )................... Knemodynerus Blüthgen View in CoL
- Parategula visible from above ( Figs 33, 35, 36 View FIGURES 31 – 36 )............................................................. 22
22. Metanotum semicircular in shape from above ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 25 – 30 ); tegula exceeds parategula posteriorly ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 25 – 30 )................................................................................................... Antodynerus de Saussure View in CoL
- Metanotum not semicircular in shape from above; tegula not exceeds parategula posteriorly....... Euodynerus Dalla Torre View in CoL
23. Metanotum bidentate ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 48 – 54. 48 )........................................................ Antepipona de Saussure View in CoL
- Metanotum not dentate................................................................................ 24
24. Tegula never exceeds parategula posteriorly ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 31 – 36 ); axillary fossa much narrower than long, sometimes slit-like, ( Figs 30 View FIGURES 25 – 30 , 36 View FIGURES 31 – 36 )................................................................................................ 25
- Tegula usually exceeds parategula posteriorly, or at least equalling it ( Figs 32–33 View FIGURES 31 – 36 ); axillary fossa oval, at least as wide as long ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 31 – 36 )........................................................................................... 29
25. Fore wing with prestigma half or less than the length of the pterostigma................. Stenodyneriellus Giordani Soika View in CoL
- Fore wing with prestigma more than half the length of the pterostigma, often nearly equal ( Figs 60, 61 View FIGURES 55 – 63 )................ 26
26. SMC3 separated from the apex of marginal cell by distance shorter than its minimum width ( Fig.60 View FIGURES 55 – 63 )................................................................................................ Allorhynchium van der Vecht View in CoL
- SMC3 separated from the apex of marginal cell by distance longer than its minimum width ( Fig.61 View FIGURES 55 – 63 )................. 27
27. Scutum posteriorly and scutellum anteriorly smooth and impunctate ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 25 – 30 )...................... Rhynchium Spinola View in CoL
- Scutum and scutellum punctate ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 25 – 30 ).................................................................. 28
28. Mesepisternum without epicnemial carina.............................................. Indodynerus Gusenleitner View in CoL
- Mesepisternum with epicnemial carina present........................................ Anterhynchium de Saussure View in CoL
29. T1 subsessile, in dorsal view narrower than T2 ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 79 – 85 )................................. Apodynerus Giordani Soika View in CoL
- T1 sessile, in dorsal view about as wide as T2.............................................................. 30
30. Metanotum projecting over propodeum; propodeum with sclerotized dorsolateral projections ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 31 – 36 ); propodeum with submarginal carina not differentiated from valvula; SMC2 with second recurrent vein far from SMC3.................................................................................................. Xenorhynchium van der Vecht View in CoL
- Metanotum not projecting over propodeum; propodeum without dorsolateral projections; propodeum with submarginal carina projecting as rounded lobe above valvula; propodeal valvula free from submarginal carina posteriorly; SMC2 with second recurrent vein nearly or completely interstitial with SMC3 ( Fig. 63 View FIGURES 55 – 63 ).............................. Epsilon de Saussure View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.