Chitona incana (W. Schmidt, 1846 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5176666 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/81105509-FFDB-540C-DFED-FF3E4B40FE9F |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Chitona incana (W. Schmidt, 1846 ) |
status |
|
Chitona incana (W. Schmidt, 1846)
( Figs. 28-32 View Figs View Fig )
Probosca incana W. Schmidt, 1846: 132 ; type locality: ‘Türkei’ [= Turkey]. Dolichopyga incana: SEIDLITZ (1899) : 833. Chitona (Dolichopyga) incana: ŠVIHLA (1986) : 232.
Type material examined. SYNTYPES: J, ‘Incana Friv., Turcia [handwritten] // FRIV [printed] // Turcia, coll. E. Friv. [printed] // Holotypus [sic!], Probosca incana Schmidt [red bordered label, red printed and black handwritten]’; ‘Turcia, coll. E. Friv. [printed] // Paratypus [sic!], Probosca incana Schmidt [red bordered label, red printed and black handwritten]’, 2 ♀♀ (all HNHM).
Additional material examined. TURKEY: İZMİR prov., İzmir, 1 J ( NMPC) ; İzmir, J. Sahlberg lgt., 1 J ( HNHM) ; Ephesus , 9.-12.v.1979, B. Malkin lgt., 1J 1♀ ; Selçuk , 17.vi.1968, Ardö lgt., 1J ; MANISA prov., Alaşehir , 10.vii.1975, 2 JJ ; AYDIN prov., Güzelçamli , 70 km S İzmir, 12.-20.vii.1996, M. Johanides lgt., 1J 2 ♀♀ ; Akköy , dry meadow, on flowers, 9.vii.1980, O. Merkl lgt., 1 J ; DENZLİİ prov., Pamukkale , 7.vi.1986, S. Kadlec & J. Voříšek lgt., 1 J ; MUĞLA prov., Patara, mouth of Eşen riv., 60 km S of Fethiye, 7.v.1991, Z. Jindra lgt., 1J 1 ♀ ; KONYA prov., Akşehir, 1900, Korb lgt., 5 JJ 5 ♀♀ (all NMPC) .
Differential diagnosis. Chitona incana is more similar to C. cretica than C. macedonica sp. nov. because of its aedeagus and the surface of the head and pronotum. It differs from both species by the shortly dilated apices of the projections of urite VIII ( Figs. 30-31 View Figs ) and the form of the paramere in both dorsal and lateral view ( Figs. 28-29 View Figs , see also the key). The last abdominal segment in both sexes and the aedeagus are very similar to those of C. cretica . This species also has two colour forms as the two preceding species. No distinguishing characters between females of C. cretica and C. incana were found.
Length J ♀: 5.5-9.3 mm.
Distribution. Southwestern Turkey (see also Fig. 32 View Fig ).
Comments. According to the present knowledge, the distribution of C. incana is restricted to southwestern Turkey. The data of its occurrence in Greece, published by previous authors, probably belong to either C. cretica or C. macedonica sp. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chitona incana (W. Schmidt, 1846 )
Švihla, Vladimír 2006 |
Probosca incana W. Schmidt, 1846: 132
SVIHLA V. 1986: 232 |
SEIDLITZ G. C. M. VON 1899: 833 |
SCHMIDT W. L. E. 1846: 132 |