Argopistes janakmoravecorum, Biondi & Iannella & D'Alessandro, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1202.122977 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1C308A71-A36D-4B60-8CD0-45BD70283919 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11358473 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/62088B6A-315D-4294-93DD-237DAC0E4BDE |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:62088B6A-315D-4294-93DD-237DAC0E4BDE |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Argopistes janakmoravecorum |
status |
sp. nov. |
Argopistes janakmoravecorum sp. nov.
Figs 2 View Figure 2 , 8 A View Figure 8
Type material.
Holotype ♀: “ Madagascar Nord / 800-1000 m / 5 km à est d’Andapa / Lembonibona (1265 m) // forêt degradee, arbres, arbustes / 2. 3. 1996 / J. Janák + P. Moravec lgt. ” [printed on white card] [14 ° 40.63 ' S; 49 ° 41.63 ' E] ( BAQ). GoogleMaps
Diagnosis.
Argopistes janakmoravecorum sp. nov. is easily distinguishable from the other Afrotropical Argopistes species by the combination of black dorsal integuments and clavate antennae with segments 1–5 yellowish and 6–11 blackened (Fig. 2 B View Figure 2 ). Spermatheca is also strongly diagnostic, due to the elongate and distally coiled ductus (Fig. 2 C View Figure 2 ).
Description of the holotype
(♀). Body roundish in dorsal view (Fig. 2 A View Figure 2 ), very convex in lateral view; total length of the body ( LB) = 3.00 mm; maximum pronotal width at the base (WP = 1.68 mm); maximum width of elytra in the middle (WE = 2.56 mm); WE / WP = 1.52. Dorsal integuments black with weak metallic reflections (Fig. 2 A View Figure 2 ); scutellum brownish; head brownish; frons and mouthparts yellowish; antennae (Fig. 2 B View Figure 2 ) with segments 1–5 yellowish, 6 dark brown, 7–10 black, 11 black but distally paler; ventral parts (Fig. 2 B View Figure 2 ) mostly dark brown; legs with femora and tibiae blackish, tarsi partially dark brown and articulations yellowish (Fig. 2 B View Figure 2 ). Head entirely hidden by the pronotum; vertex irregularly punctate, with a pair of large setiferous pores; frontal calli barely delimited, not raised; frons elongate, with rough, irregular surface; frontal ridge barely detectable; frontogenal sutures weakly raised; eyes large, elongate, slightly kidney-shaped; interantennal space clearly narrower than antennal sockets. Antennae (Fig. 2 B View Figure 2 ) clavate, as long as ~ 1 / 2 the body length ( LAN = 1.36 mm; LAN / LB = 0.45); LA = 100: 46: 32: 53: 58: 42: 47: 54: 49: 42: 69. Pronotum (Fig. 2 A View Figure 2 ) clearly transverse ( LP = 0.78 mm; WP / LP = 2.15); lateral margins strongly convergent anteriorly and slightly folded ventrally, moderately curved, barely expanded, not visible in dorsal view; basal margin arcuate and distinctly sinuate; surface finely microreticulate, with very small and dense punctation; surface moderately raised parallel to the lateral margins; a large setiferous pore at the anterior angles. Scutellum small, subtriangular. Elytra (Fig. 2 A View Figure 2 ) ( LE: 2.72 mm, LE / LP = 3.49) strongly curved laterally, slightly longer than wide ( WE / LE = 0.94), jointly rounded apically; lateral margins finely bordered, visible in dorsal view; surface subsmooth, with very small and dense punctation, similar to pronotum, mostly confused but arranged in a couple of lines of slightly larger punctures laterally. Humeral calli moderately raised. Macropterous. Prosternum with posteriorly open procoxal cavities and large intercoxal prosternal process. Mesosternum very short. First abdominal sternite slightly longer than fifth (Fig. 2 B View Figure 2 ); its central area bordered by ridges is quite wide, arcuate anteriorly and slightly narrowing posteriorly. Anterior and middle legs without modifications. Posterior femora greatly swollen ( WF / LF = 0.61), elongate-subtriangular; posterior tibiae thick, distinctly shorter than femora, apically widened and prolonged into a spur-like process on inner side; outer side of hind tibia apically toothed; apical spur of hind tibiae simple, lanceolate. Basal part of the spermatheca (Fig. 2 C View Figure 2 ) subpyriform, with a distinct ventral protrusion close to the distal part; collum very short; apical part short, narrowing towards the apex; ductus ventrally inserted, thickset, elongate, distally coiled; LSPC = 0.48 mm; LE / LSPC = 5.67.
Etymology.
The specific epithet refers to the two collectors of the new species: Jiří Janák and Pavel Moravec from the Czech Republic, both esteemed experts on Coleoptera Carabidae . The name was composed by the union of the two surnames, applying Latin plural genitive.
Distribution.
Northern Madagascar (Antsiranana province; Fig. 8 A View Figure 8 ). Malagasy chorotype.
Ecological notes.
Host plant unknown. The only known occurrence locality falls within an area characterized by the vegetation division ‘ Malagasy Evergreen & Semi-Evergreen Forest’.
LAN |
Lancing College |
LP |
Laboratory of Palaeontology |
LE |
Servico de Microbiologia e Imunologia |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |