Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis ( Dahlbom, 1842 )

Loktionov, Valery M. & Lelej, Arkady S., 2011, Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia, Zootaxa 3137, pp. 1-30 : 3-6

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.202611

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6186247

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82B-FFAA-FF92-FF58-C16D78514165

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis ( Dahlbom, 1842 )
status

 

Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis ( Dahlbom, 1842) View in CoL

( Figs 3, 4 View FIGURES 1 – 19 , 38 View FIGURES 38 – 43 , 57 View FIGURES 57 – 66 , 77 View FIGURES 77 – 94 , 95)

Pompilus abnormis Dahlbom, 1842: 10 View in CoL , 3 (lectotype, 3 "UPPBO, ö. Dalarne. 2.9.[18]40" [ Sweden], designated by v.d. Smissen 1996: 88 [Universitetets Zoologiska Institution, Lund, Sweden]).

Pompilus (Boreopompilus) abnormis: Wolf 1966: 43 View in CoL , 51, 54, 92, Ƥ 3.

Arachnospila (Boreopompilus) abnormis: Wolf 1972: 96 View in CoL , 98, 112, Ƥ 3.

Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis: Tobias 1978: 128 View in CoL , 130, Ƥ 3; Wahis 1986: 19; Lelej 1995: 243, 3; 2005: 127, Ƥ 3; v.d. Smissen 1996: 86, 87, Ƥ 3; Loktionov 2011: 83; Wahis 2011.

Arachnospila abnormis: Zonstein 2002: 137 View in CoL .

Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is easily distinguished from other males of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis -species group (hypopygium ventro-preapically with tuft of long erect setae medially) by having one row of bristles (not setae) on the hypopygium baso-laterally ( Figs 3, 4 View FIGURES 1 – 19 vs. 1, 2, 5–12). Genitalia as in Fig. 38 View FIGURES 38 – 43 .

Diagnosis of female. The female of this species is very similar to that of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kuwayamai ( Ishikawa, 1966) by having apical spine of first protarsomere more than 0.5 of protarsomere 2 in length, by shiny frons, by ratio of first flagellomere length to its width 3.2–3.9, by protarsomere 1 with three spines, but clearly differs by having curved 2rs-m vein of fore wing (Fig. 95 vs. 106). Clypeus as in Fig. 57 View FIGURES 57 – 66 . Metapostnotum as in Fig. 77 View FIGURES 77 – 94 .

Material examined. RUSSIA. Primorskiy Terr.: 1 3, Khasan, 13.VII.1992; 2 3, "Kedrovaya Pad" Reserve, 5.VI.1997; 1 3, Vladivostok, 3.VI.1978; 1 3, Anisimovka, 21.VI.1975; 1 3, Lazovsky Reserve, 20–21.VII.2006; 1 3, Milogradovo, 14.VI.1986; 1 3, Margaritovka, 14.VI.1986; 1 3, Uglekamensk, 2.VI.1994; 3 Ƥ 12 3, Brovnichi, 18.VII.1984, 5.VI.1994; 1 3, Novitzkoe, 18.VIII.1985; 1 3, Suvorovka, 13.VI.1993; 1 Ƥ 5 3, Ussuriiskiy Reserve, 30.VIII.1982, 9.VIII.1986, 2.VI.1989; 6 3, Barabash-Levada, 29.VI.1978, 3, 4.VI.1980, 23.VI.1999; 2 3, Novoselische, 5.VI.1977; 2 3, Yakovlevka, 25.VII.1986; 1 3, Shumnyi, 28.VI.1989; 1 3, Tekhmenevo, 4.VIII.1986; 1 3, 70 km SE Chuguevka, 13.VII.2010. Khabarovsk Terr.: 1 3, 15 km SW Elabuga, 4.VIII.1975; 3 3, Savinskoe, 8.VIII.1991. Amurskaya Prov.: 1 3, Shimanovsk, 1–3.VII.1958; 1 Ƥ 1 3, Natal'ino, 11, 12.VII.1975. Sakhalin: 4 Ƥ 1 3, Pomr Bay, 13.VIII.2003. Kamchatka: 1 Ƥ 1 3, 10 km S Kozyrevsk, 23.VII.1985; 2 Ƥ 1 3, Esso, 20.VII.2005; 1 Ƥ 1 3, 20 km E Esso, 21.VII.2005. Chukotka: 1 Ƥ 1 3, Omolon River, 180 km N Omolon, 24.VII, 16.VIII.1976. Magadan Prov.: 1 3, 50 km N Magadan, 2.VII.1975; 2 3, Seimchan, 24.VII, 4.VIII.1975. Buryatia: 2 3, Ust-Kiran, Chikoy River, 27.V.2008. Irkutsk Prov.: 1 3, Baikalsk, 30.VI.1983. BELARUS. 1 3, Pinsk, 15.VII.1987 [ IBSS].

Distribution. Russia (Primorskiy Terr., Khabarovsk Terr., Amurskaya Prov., North Sakhalin, Kamchatka, Magadan Prov., Chukotka; north-east, center and south of European part) ( Tobias 1978; Lelej 2005), Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Poland, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands ( Wahis 2011), Ukraine, Belarus ( Shlyachtenok 1996), Kazakhstan, North-East China, Kyrgyzstan ( Zonstein 2002).

Biology. Nests in natural cavities in the ground, sometimes females excavate short tunnels ending in a single cell ( WiŠniowski 2009).

The cleptoparasites of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis are pompilids: Evagetes sahlbergi (Dahlbom) and E. siculus (Lepeletier) (v.d. Smissen 2003).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Pompilidae

Genus

Arachnospila

SubGenus

Ammosphex

Loc

Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis ( Dahlbom, 1842 )

Loktionov, Valery M. & Lelej, Arkady S. 2011
2011
Loc

Arachnospila abnormis:

Zonstein 2002: 137
2002
Loc

Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis:

Smissen 1996: 86
Wahis 1986: 19
Tobias 1978: 128
1978
Loc

Pompilus (Boreopompilus) abnormis:

Wolf 1966: 43
1966
Loc

Pompilus abnormis

Smissen 1996: 88
Dahlbom 1842: 10
1842
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF