Guaranita yaculica Huber, 2000
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.900.2301 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D4F7B982-843D-413C-ADE6-B84AB49FFEAB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10064435 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F0B87C4-FFB4-8025-FDDF-FA79FB77FE36 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Guaranita yaculica Huber, 2000 |
status |
|
Guaranita yaculica Huber, 2000 View in CoL
Figs 2E – F View Fig , 14 – 20 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig , 32C View Fig
Guaranita yaculica Huber, 2000: 97 View in CoL , fig. 378 (♂).
Guaranita yaculica View in CoL – Huber 2014: 140. — Torres et al. 2015: 2, fig. 2a – b (♂); 2016: 10, figs 6, 13 – 15 (♀).
Guaranita yaculica View in CoL ? – Eberle et al. 2018 (molecular data). — Huber et al. 2018: 55.
Diagnosis (amendments; see Huber 2000; Torres et al. 2016)
Distinguished from known congeners by size and shape of dorsal flap on procursus ( Fig. 15F View Fig ; rounded, larger than in the similar G. goloboffi ) and by female internal genitalia ( Fig. 16C – D View Fig ; membranous median sac, similar to G. munda but smaller; lateral elements straight, not curved as in G. munda ); from G. auadae sp. nov. and G. goloboffi also by narrower distal bulbal sclerite ( Fig. 15G View Fig ).
Material examined (new records)
ARGENTINA – Jujuy • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀, 1 juv.; Calilegua National Park, Guaraní trail , near camping area; 23.7612° S, 64.8517° W; 620 m a.s.l.; 15 Mar. 2019; B.A. Huber and M.A. Izquierdo leg.; ZFMK Ar 24123 GoogleMaps • 2 ♀♀, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for preceding; LABRE-Ar 515 GoogleMaps • 6 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀ (one male used for SEM); Calilegua National Park , ~ 1 km NW of headquarters; 23.7540° S, 64.8537° W; 710 m a.s.l.; 15 Mar. 2019; B.A. Huber and M.A. Izquierdo leg.; ZFMK Ar 24124 GoogleMaps • 14 ♀♀, in pure ethanol (four prosomata used for molecular work; two females used for SEM); same collection data as for preceding; ZFMK Arg175 GoogleMaps • 4 ♂♂, 7 ♀♀, 1 juv.; same collection data as for preceding; LABRE-Ar 514 GoogleMaps • 7 ♀♀, 1 juv.; same collection data as for preceding; LABRE-Ar 520 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Calilegua National Park, Seccional Aguas Negras ; 23.7619° S, 64.8514° W; 605 m a.s.l.; 6 – 11 Dec. 2008; C. Grismado et al. leg.; MACN Ar 22134 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for preceding; MACN Ar 34688 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Calilegua National Park , entrance area; ~ 23.76° S, 64.85° W; ~ 620 m a.s.l.; 23 – 24 Sep. 1995; M. Ramírez, P. Goloboff and C. Szumik leg.; MACN Ar 19977 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂, 2 juvs; Calilegua National Park , no precise locality information; 22 Dec. 1994; C. Grismado leg.; MACN Ar 19976 • 3 ♀♀; Calilegua National Park, Aguas Negras at ~ 1100 m, no precise locality information; 5 – 7 Aug. 1997; M. Ramírez and L. Compagnucci leg.; MACN Ar 19978, 19981 .
PARAGUAY – Boquerón • 1 ♂; Enciso , “T88.09.0 r1”; 21.2061° S, 61.6575° W; 255 m a.s.l.; 3 Nov. 2001; M. Leponce leg.; IRSNB GoogleMaps • 1 ♂ prosoma; Enciso , “T90.09.0 r1”; 21.1998° S, 61.6608° W; 255 m a.s.l.; 4 Nov. 2001; M. Leponce leg.; IRSNB GoogleMaps • 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for preceding, “T90.14.0 r1”; IRSNB GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding, “T90.12.0 r1”; IRSNB GoogleMaps .
Redescription (amendments; see Huber 2000, Torres et al. 2016)
Measurements of male from Calilegua National Park: total body length 0.98, carapace width 0.45; distance PME–PME 45 µm; diameter PME 45 µm; distance PME–ALE 20 µm; distance AME–AME 20 µm; diameter AME 25 µm. Leg 1: 2.20 (0.62+ 0.14 +0.56 +0.54 +0.34), tibia 2: 0.46, tibia 3: 0.40, tibia 4: 0.68; tibia 1 L/d: 9; diameters of leg femora 0.10; of leg tibiae: 0.06. Tibia 1 in 16 males (incl. holotype): 0.50 – 0.62 (mean 0.57). Sternum slightly wider than long (0.33/0.31). Chelicerae as in Fig. 15A – C View Fig , 18A View Fig ; stridulatory files with ~17 – 23 ridges; distances between ridges proximally ~0.6 µm, distally ~2.3 µm ( Fig. 18B View Fig ). Pedipalp as in Fig. 14A – C View Fig ; tibia with two trichobothria; palpal tarsal organ capsulate, with small opening; procursus as in Fig. 15D – F View Fig and 18D – F View Fig , with large transparent ventral membrane, distinctive dorsal flap, and tip bent towards dorsal; genital bulb as in Figs 15G – I View Fig and 18D – F View Fig , with simple proximal sclerite, distal sclerite not widened in mid-section. Legs without spines and curved hairs; vertical hairs not seen in dissecting microscope but present on tibia 1 ( Fig. 19A – C View Fig ), apparently in two rows (one prolateral and one retrolateral); prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other leg tibiae; metatarsi 3 and 4 with few (1 – 3) slender hairs proximally on retrolateral-ventral side ( Fig. 19H View Fig ). Gonopore with four epiandrous spigots ( Fig. 17F View Fig ); spinnerets as in female ( Fig. 17D View Fig ; see below).
Tibia 1 in 33 females: 0.48 – 0.64 (mean 0.55). Female chelicerae without stridulatory ridges ( Fig. 18C View Fig ). Female internal genitalia with median membranous sac (receptacle?) ( Fig. 16C – D View Fig ); apparently with small pore plates ( Fig. 32C View Fig ). Each ALS ( Fig. 17B – C View Fig ) with one strongly widened spigot, one long pointed spigot, and five cylindrical spigots (of which one is much wider than the others); each PMS with two conical spigots; PLS without spigots. Palpal tarsal organ capsulate with small opening (diameter of opening 1.1 µm); leg tarsal organs with very small openings (diameters 0.7 – 0.9 µm; Fig. 20A – C View Fig ). Metatarsi 3 and 4 with long slender hairs as in male ( Fig. 19G View Fig ).
Natural history
At Calilegua National Park, the spiders were collected in forest leaf litter ( Fig. 34C View Fig ). Two egg-sacs contained five and six eggs, respectively.
Distribution
Most known records are from northern Argentina and north-eastern Paraguay ( Fig. 33B View Fig ). The single record from Corrientes in Torres et al. (2015) is dubious (misidentified G. munda ?).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Guaranita yaculica Huber, 2000
Huber, Bernhard A., Meng, Guanliang, Král, Jiří, Ávila Herrera, Ivalú M. & Izquierdo, Matías A. 2023 |
Guaranita yaculica
Huber B. A. & Eberle J. & Dimitrov D. 2018: 55 |
Guaranita yaculica
Torres V. M. & Pardo P. L. & Gonzalez-Reyes A. X. & Rodriguez-Artigas S. M. & Corronca J. A. 2015: 2 |
Huber B. A. 2014: 140 |
Guaranita yaculica
Huber B. A. 2000: 97 |