Pterogyne Tul., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., ser . 2, 20: 140. 1843.

Bruneau, Anne, de Queiroz, Luciano Paganucci, Ringelberg, Jens J., Borges, Leonardo M., Bortoluzzi, Roseli Lopes da Costa, Brown, Gillian K., Cardoso, Domingos B. O. S., Clark, Ruth P., Conceicao, Adilva de Souza, Cota, Matheus Martins Teixeira, Demeulenaere, Else, de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno, Ebinger, John E., Ferm, Julia, Fonseca-Cortes, Andres, Gagnon, Edeline, Grether, Rosaura, Guerra, Ethiene, Haston, Elspeth, Herendeen, Patrick S., Hernandez, Hector M., Hopkins, Helen C. F., Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau, Hughes, Colin E., Ickert-Bond, Stefanie M., Iganci, Joao, Koenen, Erik J. M., Lewis, Gwilym P., de Lima, Haroldo Cavalcante, de Lima, Alexandre Gibau, Luckow, Melissa, Marazzi, Brigitte, Maslin, Bruce R., Morales, Matias, Morim, Marli Pires, Murphy, Daniel J., O'Donnell, Shawn A., Oliveira, Filipe Gomes, Oliveira, Ana Carla da Silva, Rando, Juliana Gastaldello, Ribeiro, Petala Gomes, Ribeiro, Carolina Lima, Santos, Felipe da Silva, Seigler, David S., da Silva, Guilherme Sousa, Simon, Marcelo F., Soares, Marcos Vinicius Batista & Terra, Vanessa, 2024, Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification, PhytoKeys 240, pp. 1-552 : 1

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7D8E031B-434D-364B-503E-E75C067C84A8

treatment provided by

PhytoKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Pterogyne Tul., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., ser . 2, 20: 140. 1843.
status

 

Pterogyne Tul., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., ser. 2, 20: 140. 1843. View in CoL

Figs 19 View Figure 19 , 20 View Figure 20

Type.

Pterogyne nitens Tul.

Description.

Medium to tall trees, mostly 4-8 m but sometimes to 20 m, unarmed (Fig. 19A View Figure 19 ); bark light grey; short shoots absent. Stipules very small and falling well before leaf expansion (Fig. 19B View Figure 19 ). Leaves imparipinnate, petiole and leaf rachis dorsally flattened and sulcate, the rachis extending beyond the distal leaflet, 7-13-foliolate, leaflets alternate, mostly elliptical, pinnately veined, secondary veins brochidrodromous; stipels setiform, small, caducous (Fig. 19B View Figure 19 ); extrafloral nectaries absent. Inflorescence bracteate, amentiform, densely multi-flowered, short racemes, these isolated or grouped in short axillary clusters (Fig. 19C, D View Figure 19 ). Flowers small (ca. 3-5 mm diam), actinomorphic, bisexual or unisexual (staminate), pedicellate, greenish-yellow (Fig. 19E View Figure 19 ); hypanthium absent; sepals 5, free; petals 5, free, imbricate, reflexed; stamens 10, free; pollen grains in monads, 3-colporate, exine psilate ( Soares et al. 2020); intrastaminal disk short with an undulate rim; ovary shortly stipitate, pubescent, narrowly winged along the adaxial margin at the distal half, the style laterally attached near the apex of the ovary, staminate flowers lacking a gynoecium or provided with a pistilode composed by an ovary but lacking a style. Fruit a wind-dispersed one-seeded samara, flat compressed, straw coloured, stipitate; seed-chamber strongly veined with a small beak (style remnant) laterally displaced near the apex; wing paleaceous (Fig. 19F View Figure 19 ). Seed oblong, flat compressed, with a punctiform terminal hilum (Fig. 19G View Figure 19 ).

Chromosome number.

2 n = 20 ( Bandel 1974; Melloni 2010).

Included species and geographic distribution.

Monospecific ( P. nitens ), distributed across north-eastern, eastern and central Brazil, northern Argentina and Paraguay and south-eastern Bolivia (Fig. 20 View Figure 20 ).

Ecology.

Pterogyne nitens is a tree of the South American tropical and subtropical seasonally dry forests of north-eastern Brazil (Caatinga), central Brazil (Cerrado) and chaquean forests (northern Argentina, Paraguay and southern Bolivia), also occurring in eastern Brazilian semi-deciduous forests of the Mata Atlântica. It occurs mostly as a pioneer tree colonizing degraded areas. It flowers in a very short period and the flowers are visited by a wide range of small insects ( Pfeiffer 2018).

Etymology.

From pteros (Greek: πτέρυξ = wing) and gynos - (Greek: γυνή = woman, gynoecium) referring to the ovary provided with a narrow wing along one margin.

Human uses.

Pterogyne nitens is planted as an urban tree (Fig. 19A View Figure 19 ). Its silica rich wood is rated as moderately durable in terms of decay resistance and easy to work both by hand and machine tools. It can be used for flooring, furniture, cabinetry, interior trim and turned objects ( Lewis 2005b; Meier 2021). It is a fast growing tree occurring in soils of low natural fertility, and has been recommended for planting in riparian forest with periodic flooding, and resetting and restoration of degraded areas ( Mauro et al. 2008). Preparations from the stem bark have been used by local Paraguayan populations in the therapy of ascariasis ( Crivos et al. 2007). Several guanidine alkaloids with cytotoxic activity have been isolated from leaves and fruits ( Regasini et al. 2009). Leaves are reported as toxic to livestock.

Notes.

The phylogenetic position of the genus is still uncertain and conflicting among different analyses (see Fig. 18 View Figure 18 and discussion above).

The compact catkin-like racemes with rather small flowers and the samara fruits are similar to those found in the African-Asiatic genus Pterolobium R. Br. ex Wight & Arn. of tribe Caesalpinieae ( Gagnon et al. 2016; see Caesalpinieae tribe, page 103), but Pterogyne is an unarmed tree with imparipinnate leaves and alternate leaflets, the ovary has a uniquely winged margin along the distal half and the style attachment is displaced to a subterminal position, while Pterolobium has branches armed with prickles, the leaves are bipinnate with opposite leaflets, the ovary is unwinged and the style is attached at the apex. The samara wing of Pterogyne is clearly derived from the expansion of the marginal wing of the ovary below the style. The style remains as a beak on the fruit and is laterally displaced above the seed-chamber ( Polhill and Vidal 1981).

Taxonomic references.

Lewis (2005b); Polhill and Vidal (1981); Queiroz (2009); Tulasne (1843).

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Fabales

Family

Fabaceae