Grania, LEVIS COATES & ERSEUS, 1985: 111 - 112
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12333 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7526479 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7B5287F0-DE55-E471-E3A8-3FEB05E2CDBA |
treatment provided by |
Carolina (2021-04-26 13:33:32, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-02 07:36:04) |
scientific name |
Grania |
status |
|
GRANIA CF. LEVIS COATES & ERSÉUS, 1985
PROBABLY GRANIA LEVIS COATES & ERSÉUS, 1985: 111–112 View in CoL View at ENA , FIG. 6 View Figure 6
Material examined
USNM 1283176 About USNM , CE11570, whole-mounted, sexually immature specimen, with some segments amputated, from off North Carolina, USA, 33°10′23″N, 76°45′23″W. Continental shelf slope, 492 m in depth, sand. Collected by C. Erséus, 20 May 2011. COI barcode KT428114 View Materials ; for other genes, see Table 1 View Table 1 GoogleMaps .
Remarks
This barcoded, but immature specimen, and thus unsuitable for complete morphological description, was included in the phylogenetic analysis, to enlarge the taxonomic sampling from the north-western Atlantic region. Phylogenetically, this specimen came out as closely related to G. carolinensis sp. nov. ( Fig. 15 View Figure 15 ), but it is morphologically distinct by its complete lack of chaetae. The latter trait suggests that this specimen could belong to Grania levis Coates & Erséus, 1985 , originally described from somewhat further north, from Georges Bank, south-east of Massachusetts, USA.
GENETIC ANALYSES
COI clustering
The Bayesian inference of the COI sequences divide the 38 individuals into ten well-supported clades ( Fig. 11 View Figure 11 ), four of which are found in South Africa, two in Chile, one in Brazil, and three in the North Atlantic. Within-clade variation is generally low, but in one clade, i.e. all specimens referred to the new taxon G. chilensis sp. nov., there is a notable subclustering pattern, dividing this clade into four subclades. A haplotype network ( Fig. 12 View Figure 12 ) indicates that G. chilensis sp. nov. is structured geographically, with two subclades found in the southernmost site (Valdivia), one subclade in the northernmost site (Coquimbo), and an intermediate subclade in the intermediately located site (Concepcion). Pairwise genetic distances indicate that in general there is a strong barcoding gap present between lineages within this group. In the G. chilensis sp. nov. clade, however, there is higher than average within-species divergence, although not nearly as great as the lowest between-species differences ( Fig. 13 View Figure 13 ).
ITS clustering
The Bayesian inference analysis of 23 ITS sequences supports all ten clusters found in the mitochondrial data ( Fig. 14 View Figure 14 ); however, although there is also variation within the G. chilensis sp. nov. cluster in the ITS region, the geographic substructuring is not seen here. Instead, the variation seems to be randomly distributed with respect to geography.
Phylogenetic placement of new species
The updated phylogeny is completely congruent with that described in De Wit et al. (2011b), containing three main clades (A, B, C in Fig. 15 View Figure 15 ). All of the South African species form one strongly supported clade within clade A, together with all the North Atlantic species. By contrast, the Chilean and the Brazilian species are placed in clade B, together with Grania curta De Wit & Erséus, 2007 and G. americana . Grania unitheca sp. nov. from shallow water in North Carolina (North Atlantic) is placed together with the other North American species G. monospermatheca (its sister taxon) and G. laxartus ; however, G. carolinensis sp. nov. and the closely related immature specimen of Grania cf. levis , both found in deep water off the North Carolinian coast, are placed as the sister clade of G. postclitellochaeta and the cryptic G. occulta , whereas G. ovitheca , which is morphologically identical to G. occulta , is strongly supported as the sister to this four-taxon group ( Fig. 15 View Figure 15 ).
Coates KA, Erseus C. 1985. Marine Enchytraeids (Oligochaeta) of the Coastal Northwest Atlantic (Northern and Mid U. S. A.) Zoologica Scripta, 14: 103 - 116.
De Wit P, Erseus C. 2007. Seven new species of Grania (Annelida: Clitellata: Enchytraeidae) from New Caledonia, South Pacific Ocean. Zootaxa 50: 27 - 50.
De Wit P, Rota E, Erseus C. 2011 b. Phylogeny and character evolution in Grania (Annelida, Clitellata). Zoologica Scripta 40: 509 - 519.
Figure 6. Grania simonae sp. nov. A, chaetae. B, spermatheca. C, coelomocytes. D, penial bulb and sperm funnel. See text for abbreviations.
Figure 11. Majority-rule consensus gene tree of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) locus from all species described in this study. Posterior probabilities calculated from Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) inference are noted above the branches. Note the four clades within Grania chilensis sp. nov.
Figure 12. Haplotype network of individuals of Grania chilensis sp. nov. Note the long distance (35 steps) between the two groups found in Valdivia.
Figure 13. Distance histogram of pairwise uncorrected p distances between all individuals analysed genetically in this study. Within-species distances range from 0 to 8% (0–3% if not counting Grania chilensis sp. nov.); between-species distances range from 16 to 25%.
Figure 14. Majority-rule consensus gene tree of the ITS region (ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2) from all species described in this study. Posterior probabilities calculated from Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) inference are noted above the branches. Note that the four Grania chilensis sp. nov. clades seen in the COI locus are absent here.
Figure 15. Multi-locus phylogeny of all available genetic data in Grania to date, using three mitochondrial and three nuclear loci. New species from this study are marked in bold. Majority-rule consensus tree from Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) inference; clade posterior probabilities are given next to the nodes.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |