Hypoponera surda Bolton & Fisher, 2011
publication ID |
23490 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6191126 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7B1AB1F0-ED2B-CE4D-04A2-92B859420E10 |
treatment provided by |
Donat |
scientific name |
Hypoponera surda Bolton & Fisher |
status |
sp. n. |
Hypoponera surda Bolton & Fisher HNS sp. n.
(Figs 118 – 120)
WORKER (holotype in parentheses). Measurements: HL 0.63 – 0.68 (0.66), HW 0.52 – 0.56 (0.54), HS 0.585 – 0.620 (0.600), SL 0.46 – 0.48 (0.48), PrW 0.40 – 0.42 (0.42), WL 0.86 – 0.90 (0.88), HFL 0.48 (0.48), PeNL 0.19 – 0.21 (0.20), PeH 0.40 – 0.45 (0.45), PeNW 0.28 – 0.30 (0.30), PeS 0.297 – 0.317 (0.317) (5 measured). Indices: CI 82 – 83 (82), SI 86 – 91 (89), PeNI 69 – 71 (71), LPeI 44 – 50 (44), DPeI 140 – 150 (150).
Eyes absent. Apex of scape, when laid straight back from its insertion, just fails to reach, or just touches, the midpoint of the posterior margin in full-face view; SL/HL 0.71 – 0.75. Cephalic dorsum finely reticulate-punctate. Pronotal dorsum almost smooth, obviously much less strongly and densely sculptured than cephalic dorsum. Metanotal groove absent from dorsum of mesosoma. Mesonotal-mesopleural suture absent from side of mesosoma. Propodeum weakly marginate between declivity and side. Posterior surface of petiole node with a series of very short cuticular ridges that radiate upward from the peduncle. Node of petiole in profile with the anterior and posterior faces parallel, the dorsum shallowly convex. Petiole node in dorsal view thickly D-shaped, posterior face transverse and anterior face strongly and quite narrowly convex. Subpetiolar process blunt or with a feeble ventral angle. Maximum width of first gastral tergite in dorsal view greater than width of second gastral tergite at its midlength. Cross-ribs at base of cinctus of second gastral tergite conspicuous. Midline length of second gastral posttergite, from posterior margin of cinctus to apex, is about equal to the width of the segment at its midlength. Disc of second gastral tergite with small punctures that are relatively widely spaced and separated by areas of glossy cuticle; the diameters of the punctures are less than the distances that separate the punctures. First and second gastral tergites dorsally pubescent and with a number of short standing setae that project above the level of the pubescence.
Holotype worker (upper of two specimens on pin), Kenya: Embu, Kirimiri For. W. of Runyenje, 1550 m., 3.x.1977 (V. Mahnert & J.-L. Perret) (MHNG).
Paratypes. 8 workers with same data as holotype (MHNG, BMNH, CASC, BBRC).
Among the species that possess cuticular ridges at the base of the posterior face of the petiole node, surda HNS is fairly distinct. The two species faex HNS and hebes HNS have very coarse cephalic and pronotal sculpture, whereas in surda HNS the cephalic sculpture is fine and almost effaced on the pronotum. In addition, faex HNS is much larger (HW 0.72) and has well-developed eyes, while hebes HNS has a broader petiole node (PeNI 80 – 84) and very obvious long, standing setae on the first and second gastral tergites dorsally; these are much longer and more conspicuous than those of surda HNS . The remaining species, mixta HNS , jeanneli HNS , jocosa HNS , quaestio HNS and ursa HNS , have more densely packed punctate sculpture on the disc of the second gastral tergite, and have petiole nodes that are not distinctly thickly D-shaped in dorsal view. See also the notes under jeanneli HNS .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |