Coronatella (Coronatella) rectangula (Sars, 1962)

Sinev, Artem Y., 2020, Revision of the elegans-group of Alona s. lato and its status as a subgenus of Coronatella Dybowski & Grochowski, 1894 (Cladocera: Anomopoda Chydoridae), Zootaxa 4732 (4), pp. 501-526 : 519

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4732.4.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:33361FFC-9C1C-4046-9F59-456BB9A081CE

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3671660

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7A4AD829-FFE5-FFDF-DFC1-662C4258F828

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Coronatella (Coronatella) rectangula (Sars, 1962)
status

 

Coronatella (Coronatella) rectangula (Sars, 1962) View in CoL

Figs (9I-O)

Sars, 1861: 18 ( Alona ( Lynceus )); P. E. Muller, 1867: 178, Pl. IV, fig. 3, 4 ( Alona lineata ), 181, Pl. IV, fig. 8,9 ( Alona guttata ); Hudendorff, 1876: 53, Pl. II, fig. 5 ( Alona inornata ); Hellich, 1874: 219 ( Alona pulchra ); Kurz, 1875: 54-55, Pl. II, Fig. 4-6 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 ( Alona coronata ); Hellich, 1877: 93-94, fig. 51 ( Alona lineata ); Stingelin, 1895: 249-250, pl. VII, Fig. 36 ( Alona pulchra ), 250, pl. VII, fig. 37 ( Alona richardi ); Lilljeborg, 1900: 476-482, Pl. LXVIII, fig. 30, 31, Pl. LXIX, fig. 1, 4-6 ( Lynceus rectangulus ); Herbst, 1962: 88-89, Fig. 67 ( Alona ); Šramek-Husek et al., 1962: 346-347, Fig. 128, A-F ( Alona ); Smirnov, 1971: 346-349, Fig. 391-395 ( Alona rectangula rectangula ); Flössner 1972: 314-316, Fig. 149 ( Alona ); Chiang & Du, 1979: 224-225, Fig. 153 ( Alona ); Idris, 1983: 119, Fig. 56 ( Alona cf. rectangula ); Negrea, 1983: 285-288, Fig. 116 ( Alona ); Margaritora, 1985: 298-301, Fig. 117 ( Alona ); Frey, 1988 a: 1387-1400, fig. 1-56 ( Alona ); Sars, 1993: 137, Pl. 99, Fig. 5-9 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 ( Alona lineata ); Alonso 1996: 313-315, Fig. 140 ( Alona ); Smirnov 1996: 15-17, Fig. 107-116 ( Alona rectangula pulchra ); Sinev, 2001: 83-86, Fig. 1-8 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 ( Alona ); Flossner, 2000: 300-303, Fig. 111 ( Alona ); Van Damme & Dumont, 2008a: 10-15, Fig. 3-4 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 , 10D; Hudec, 2010: 322-335, Fig. 82 ( Alona ); Sinev, 2016: 467, Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 E-H.

Material examined here. 6 parthenogenetic females from Lukie lake, Poleski Park Narodowy, Lublin Area, Poland, 02.07.2011, coll A.Y. Sinev & I. Zawiska; over 50 parthenogenetic females, 10 ephippial females, 5 males from Nizhnee Ershovskoe lake, White Sea Biological Station of Moscow State University, Republic of Karelia, Russia, 08-09.1996, coll. E. I. Izvekova, A. Y. Sinev; 20 parthenogenetic females, ephippial female, 7 males from Nero lake , Yaroslavl Area, Russia, 15.IX.1987, from N. N. Smirnov’s collection; over 30 parthenogenetic females from pond #1 on Gnilichka river, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia, 29.07.2018, coll . V. S. Zhikharev; 17 parthenogenetic females, 2 males from pond near 9 th Dachnaja street, Saratov, Russia, 09-10.1998, coll. E. E. Morozova ; over 30 parthenogenetic females lake at Arylakh village , Yakutia Autonomous Republic, Russia, N 62.44764° N, 130.9635° E, 30.8.2010, coll. A.A.Kotov GoogleMaps , AAK 2011-057; over 100 parthenogenetic and ephippial females, over 50 males from pond in Avangard village , Nakhodka District, Primorsky Area, Russia, 13.X.1999, leg. E.N. Temereva.

Material examined earlier. See list of material in Sinev (2001). Morphology of studied specimens (see Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ) agrees with the earlier descriptions of the species ( Frey 1988; Alonso 1996; Sinev, 2001; Van Damme & Dumont 2008a; Hudec, 2010). Additional seta near scraper 1 of limb II ( Fig. 9C View FIGURE 9 ) was found in all studied populations, and lateral aestetascs on male antennule ( Fig. 9E View FIGURE 9 ) was found in all studied populations with males present.

Area of distribution. Palaearctic and Oriental regions. Records of C. (C.) rectangula in Subsahel Africa, Arabia and Central Asia should be rechecked due to presence of sibling species, C. (C.) cf. bukobensis and C. (C.) anemae (see Van Damme & Dumont 2008), and also C. (C.) hardingi . Records from Australia need also to be rechecked. Recorded from New Zealand and Australia C. (C.) novae-zelandiae is very similar to C (C.) rectangula in outer morphology, but description of its limbs ( Smirnov 1971) leaves no doubts that it is a separate species, clearly different from C. (C.) rectangula in morphology of IDL setae.

V

Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF