Mysmenopsis Simon, 1897
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3972.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F0E20E1D-1AA3-494E-A0CC-6B18CF678FE1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6113720 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/785BF13C-FFA3-FFF2-FF1D-FEC1691AFBA5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mysmenopsis Simon, 1897 |
status |
|
Mysmenopsis Simon, 1897 View in CoL View at ENA
Type species: Mysmenopsis femoralis Simon, 1897
Diagnosis (Based on Lopardo & Hormiga 2015: 781). Males with prolateral row of modified setae on the distal half of tarsus I ( Lopardo & Hormiga 2015: figs. 54G, 59D); often with proximal row of 5–8 spines on metatarsus I ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2 – 7 ). Females with distal ventral projection on femur I ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 2 – 7 ). Male palp with a globose tibia with an apical excavation bearing spurs; two retrolateral–dorsal trichobothria ( Figs. 3 View FIGURES 2 – 7 , 9 View FIGURES 8 – 12 , 14 View FIGURES 13 – 17 , 19 View FIGURES 18 – 22 ); a prolateral cymbium without internal conductor grooves or cymbial fold, but with a distinct tip, and with a hook-shaped paracymbium bent inwards ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 2 – 7 , 10 View FIGURES 8 – 12 , 15 View FIGURES 13 – 17 , 20 View FIGURES 18 – 22 ); a short apical bifid embolus with ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 8 – 12 ) or without embolic base apophysis ( Figs. 3 View FIGURES 2 – 7 , 14 View FIGURES 13 – 17 , 19 View FIGURES 18 – 22 ). Females with a sclerotized and protruding epigynal plate ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 2 – 7 , 11 View FIGURES 8 – 12 , 16 View FIGURES 13 – 17 , 21 View FIGURES 18 – 22 ).
Composition. M. archeri Platnick and Shadab, 1978 ; M. atahualpa Baert, 1990 ; M. beebei ( Gertsch, 1960) , M. capac Baert, 1990 , M. chiquita n. sp., M. cidrelicola ( Simon, 1895) ; M. cienaga Müller, 1987 ; M. cymbia ( Levi, 1956) ; M. dipluramigo Platnick and Shadab, 1978 ; M. femoralis Simon, 1897 ; M. fernandoi n. sp.; M. funebris Simon, 1897 ; M. furtiva Coyle and Meigs, 1989 ; M. gamboa Platnick and Shadab, 1978 ; M. huascar Baert, 1990 ; M. ischnamigo Platnick and Shadab, 1978 ; M. ixlitla ( Levi, 1956) ; M. kochalkai Platnick and Shadab, 1978 ; M. mexcala Gertsch, 1960 ; M. monticola Coyle and Meigs,1989 ; M. onorei n. sp.; M. otonga n. sp.; M. pachacutec Baert, 1990 ; M. palpalis ( Kraus, 1955) ; M. penai Platnick and Shadab, 1978 ; M. schlingeri Platnick and Shadab, 1978 ; M. tengellacompa Platnick, 1993 ; M. tibialis ( Bryant, 1940) ; M. viracocha Baert, 1990 ; M. wygodzinskyi Platnick and Shadab, 1978 ; and M. yupanqui Baert, 1990 .
Distribution. USA, México, Honduras, Costa Rica , Cuba, Jamaica, Trinidad, St. Vincent, Panamá, Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil and Peru.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.