Anisophyllodes candango, Hernandes & Valim & Mironov, 2007

Hernandes, Fábio A., Valim, Michel P. & Mironov, Sergey V., 2007, Two new genera and five new species of the feather mite subfamily Proctophyllodinae (Astigmata: Proctophyllodidae) from suboscine birds in Brazil, Journal of Natural History (J. Nat. Hist.) 41 (41 - 44), pp. 2653-2681 : 2669-2674

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222930701644718

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:09FFB4B8-339E-411B-906A-61EE6AB05103

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B26CC79A-75A5-4D82-A02D-4074D1D5D270

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:B26CC79A-75A5-4D82-A02D-4074D1D5D270

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Anisophyllodes candango
status

sp. nov.

Anisophyllodes candango sp. n.

( Figures 30–40 View Figures 30, 31 View Figures 32, 33 View Figures 34–37 View Figures 38–40 )

Type material

Male holotype, two male and six female paratypes from the Lesser Elaenia , Elaenia chiriquensis Lawrence, 1865 ( Passeriformes , Tyrannidae ), Fazenda Agua Limpa, Brasília, D.F., Brazil (15 ° 579S, 47 ° 569W); 9 August 2002, coll. M. F. Kanegae. Holotype and paratypes are deposited at CAIOC; a paratype female and male are deposited at DZSJRP.

Differential diagnosis

Among two formerly known species, the new species is morphologically similar to Anisophyllodes intermedius . The males of A. candango differ from A. intermedius by relatively wider idiosoma, with the ratio of length to width about 1.9–2, and by the rounded lateral extensions bearing bases of setae h2; the females are distinguished by significantly wider terminal cleft, which is 1.2–1.3 times longer than wide. In the males of A. intermedius , the idiosoma is much narrower, 2.5–2.7 times longer than wide, and the lateral extensions of the opisthosoma bearing setae h2 are acute apically; in the females, the terminal cleft is long and narrow, 3.5–4 times longer than wide.

Description

Male holotype (presumed heteromorphic) ( Figures 30–37 View Figures 30, 31 View Figures 32, 33 View Figures 34–37 ) (range for two paratypes indicated in parentheses). Length of idiosoma 325 (308–330), width 165 (154–165). Prodorsal shield: 90 (87–92) in length, 95 (92–99) in width, surface without lacunae or pale sclerotized areas, posterior margin with two shallow concavities. Scapular setae se 109 in length (122– 128) and separated by 68 (69–73); si separated by 46 (48–52). Setae c1 on hysteronotal shield; setae c2 on striated tegument, setae cp on humeral shield; setae c3 lanceolate, 20 in length and 3 in width (18–22×3). Distance between prodorsal and hysteronotal shields 35 (35). Hysteronotal shield: 199 (199–218) in length, 90 (90–101) in width; anterior margin concave; surface with numerous oval lacunae in posterior half, between levels of setae d2 and h1 ( Figures 30 View Figures 30, 31 , 32 View Figures 32, 33 ). Opisthosoma strongly attenuate posteriorly; opisthosomal lobes almost rectangular, their posterior margin truncate with short and wide terminal lamellae, about 8 (8) in length and 24 (23–25) in width. Terminal cleft slit-shaped, 44 (44–52) in length; supranal concavity distinct. Setae h3 situated on outer margins of lobes separated by 41 (37–39). Length of setae: h3 114 (114–122), h2 226 (209–218), f2 11 (11), ps1 8 (8), ps2 33 (29–33), ps3 8 (8). Distance between dorsal setae: si–c1 58 (56–58), c1–c2 46 (41–49), c1–d1 45 (44–48), d1–d2 26 (26–31), d1–e1 73 (71–76), d2– e1 52 (49–52), e1– e2 27 (22–27), e1–h1 49 (48–52), e2–h1 24 (24–27), h1–f2 22 (20–44).

Epimerites I well separated, posterior tips slightly divergent, epimerites I, II with narrow surface fields; epimerites IVa present, rudimentary sclerite rEpIIa absent. Aedeagus 24 (24–25) in length, reaching the level of setae g, genital arch 35 (35) in width and 16 (18–19) in length. Genital acetabula on small oval plates at level of genital arch apex. Pregenital plates represented by a pair of longitudinal sclerites situated between tips of epimerites IIIa and genital apparatus; setae 4a on posterior tips of these sclerites ( Figures 31 View Figures 30, 31 , 33 View Figures 32, 33 ). Setae 3a posterior to inner tips of epimerites III. Distance between ventral setae: 3a–4a 29 (27–33), 4a–g 31 (35), g–ps3 39 (37–41), ps3–ps3 19 (18–19). Adanal shields represented by a pair of oblique sclerites situated anterolateral to anal suckers; setae ps3 situated mesal to these sclerites ( Figures 31 View Figures 30, 31 , 33 View Figures 32, 33 ). Anal suckers edentate, 7 (8) in diameter, distance between discs 16 (14).

Tarsus IV 33 (33–34) in length, with apical claw-like process and with minute spine-like process near base of ventral seta r; button-like seta d closer to base of this segment ( Figure 37 View Figures 34–37 ).

Female ( Figures 38–40 View Figures 38–40 ) (measurements of six paratypes). Length of idiosoma 352–385, width 154–176. Prodorsal shield: form as in male, 92–95 in length and 92–112 in width. Setae se 139–147 in length and separated by 79–80; setae si separated by 53–58. Setae c1 on anterior hysteronotal shield; setae c2 on antero-medial tips of humeral shields; setae c3 lanceolate, 19–24 in length and 4–5 in width. Setae cp set on humeral shield. Distance between prodorsal and hysteronotal shields 35–38. Anterior hysteronotal shield: 180–185 in length and 101–114 in width; anterior margin slightly concave, anterior angles acute, posterior margin with short median extension, surface with numerous oval-shaped lacunae on posterior third ( Figure 38 View Figures 38–40 ). Lobar region: 49–57 in length and 76–82 in width. Terminal cleft as an inverted U, 31–35 in length and 22–24 in width. Supranal concavity indistinct; area between bases of lobes with several transverse striae. Setae h2 setiform, 125–144 in length, 5 in width; setae h3 60–64 in length and separated by 45–49. Setae h1 inserted on striated tegument between the anterior hysteronotal and lobar shields. Setae h1 and f 2 in trapezoidal arrangement. Distance between dorsal setae: si–c1 58–63, c1–c2 48–52, c1–d1 48–61, d1–d2 31–44, d1–e1 78–91, d2– e1 50–58, e1– e2 41–49, e1–h1 51–58, e2–h1 23–24, h1–f2 23–27, f2–h2 12–14.

Epimerites I as in male; epimerites I, II and III with narrow surface fields. Setae ps2 and ps3 setiform, setae ps2 at level of posterior part of anal opening. Epigynium horseshoeshaped, 44–46 in length, 63–68 in width, tips extending to level of setae g. Distance between ventral setae: 1a–3a 49–54, 3a–g 19–29, 4a–ps3 75–78, g–4a 65–79, ps2–ps3 19– 22, ps2–ps2 39–44, ps3–ps3 15–18. Copulatory opening terminal. Spermatheca and spermaducts as in Figure 40 View Figures 38–40 . Legs I, II as in the male; legs IV extending by ambulacral disc to the level of setae h3 ( Figures 38, 39 View Figures 38–40 ).

Etymology

The specific epithet derives from candango (African origin), a common name meaning those who live, but were not actually born in Brasilia (the capital of Brazil), the type locality of this mite species; the name is a noun in apposition .

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF