Dimorphomyrmex, André, 1892
publication ID |
20597 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10565020 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7590C998-25A0-DD0A-D15A-9F8A6E1C314C |
treatment provided by |
Christiana |
scientific name |
Dimorphomyrmex |
status |
|
Formicinae
(Camponotinae of authors)
Worker mononomorphic or more-or less polymorphic, only in a few cases with pronounced dimorphism ( Dimorphomyrmex HNS ). Frontal carinae often feebly developed and the elypeus is only exceptionally produced between them { Dimorphomyrmex HNS , Gesomyrmex HNS ); even then, it is not properly wedged in. Antennae 8- to 12-jointed, usually long and filiform; the funiculus rarely with a feeble 4- or 5-jointed club. Abdominal pedicel always formed by one segment, the petiole, which is usually scale-like; there is never a trace of constriction between the second and third abdominal segments and the stridulator}- organ is also lacking at the base of the third segment. Sting vestigial; the poison-glands are converted into a cushion of convolutions(Forel's pulvilliferous vesicle); the sting forms merely the sustentacular apparatus for the orifice of this poison vesicle. The ejaculation of the poison can in certain genera ( Formica HNS ) be effected with great force. Orifice of the cloaca always circular and terminal, ciliated round the margin.
Female always winged and similar to the worker, though of much larger size.
Male winged, with the genitalia always exserted.
The venation of the wings is more or less reduced, often considerably so. In its most primitive stage there is still one cubital, a closed radial, and a closed discoidal cell; but there is no intercubitus, the radius and cubitus being confluent over a part of their course (Formica-type). Reduction has usually started by the disappearance of the recurrent vein, there being no discoidal cell ( Camponotus HNS , Oecophylla HNS ). An intercubitus is only rarely present and then very short ( Myrmoteras HNS , which has the most primitive venation of this subfamily).
Nymphs usually enclosed in cocoons; but there are some exceptions ( Oecophylla HNS , Prenolepis HNS ).
The members of this subfamily are morphologically the most highly developed of all ants; this is also true for their ethological peculiarities. Not only are their habits very diverse, but they show the most specialized form of mental and social behavior. The diet is in large part vegetarian and these ants show great predilection for sugary substances, which are sometimes stored in a special, replete form of worker (honey ants: Melophorus HNS , Myrmecocystus HNS , certain Plagiolepis HNS , etc.). The species of Oecophylla HNS and certain Polyrhachis HNS and Camponotus HNS build silk nests in leaves, using their larvae as silk-producing shuttles. Moreover, the nesting habits in this subfamily are very varied. Certain species of Formica HNS and Polyergus HNS are slave-makers; the species of Polyergus HNS are true social parasites of Formica HNS , entirely dependent upon their slaves, but the worker caste is still present.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |